# 1440P 144HZ vs 4K 60HZ for Battlefield 1? **URL:** \ **Category:** PC\ **Created:** [May 8, 2016, 7:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802 "2016-05-08T19:21:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 19\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ThatGuyBenny](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thatguybenny/32/104964_2.png) [@ThatGuyBenny](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThatGuyBenny)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 7:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/1 "2016-05-08T19:21:00Z")
I have a 1MS 144HZ 1440P monitor and a 1MS 60HZ IPS 4K Monitor and I’m going to be playing Battlefield on them. I’m not sure which one to play on, my PC can handle 144fps at 1440p and 60fps at 4k (I’m going to get 2 GTX 1080s when they come out). So would the smoothness of 144HZ really be that noticeable and helpful in a World War 1 game? I know for BF4 144HZ helped me to play better as a player but that’s because BF4 is a lot more face paced and you have to spray people down etc. Since this game might be a bit more chill and slow paced, would it make a big difference if I played at 4K 60HZ instead of 1440P 144HZ? ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 7:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/2 "2016-05-08T19:23:00Z")
I personally would play on 1440 with 144hz, 4k is nice, but the smoothness at 144 outdoes 4k for me ---
**Author:** ![xxxCoOlBr33zExxx](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/x/da6949/32.png) [@xxxCoOlBr33zExxx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/xxxCoOlBr33zExxx)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 7:32pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/3 "2016-05-08T19:32:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > I personally would play on 1440 with 144hz, 4k is nice, but the smoothness at 144 outdoes 4k for me ^^^what Pool said. ---
**Author:** ![MrMackeyMKayyy](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mrmackeymkayyy/32/104913_2.png) [@MrMackeyMKayyy](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MrMackeyMKayyy)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 9:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/4 "2016-05-08T21:02:00Z")
1440p 144hz all day. ---
**Author:** ![m1k3ol](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/eb9ed0/32.png) [@m1k3ol](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/m1k3ol)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 9:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/5 "2016-05-08T21:21:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > I personally would play on 1440 with 144hz, 4k is nice, but the smoothness at 144 outdoes 4k for me This Also, 4K without at least 120hz is just a “no” for FPS gaming ---
**Author:** ![UnKnOwNzH1](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/unknownzh1/32/104973_2.png) [@UnKnOwNzH1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/UnKnOwNzH1)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 10:00pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/6 "2016-05-08T22:00:00Z")
pls 4k battlefield !! ---
**Author:** ![zen025](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/c89c15/32.png) [@zen025](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/zen025)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2016, 10:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/7 "2016-05-08T22:26:00Z")
> [@ThatGuyBenny](#): > > I have a 1MS 144HZ 1440P monitor and a 1MS 60HZ IPS 4K Monitor and I’m going to be playing Battlefield on them. I’m not sure which one to play on, my PC can handle 144fps at 1440p and 60fps at 4k (I’m going to get 2 GTX 1080s when they come out). So would the smoothness of 144HZ really be that noticeable and helpful in a World War 1 game? I know for BF4 144HZ helped me to play better as a player but that’s because BF4 is a lot more face paced and you have to spray people down etc. Since this game might be a bit more chill and slow paced, would it make a big difference if I played at 4K 60HZ instead of 1440P 144HZ? I would go with the 144HZ. Out of curiosity what is your 144HZ monitor? ---
**Author:** ![jaydog32](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jaydog32/32/102371_2.png) [@jaydog32](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/jaydog32)\ **Post date:** [May 9, 2016, 4:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/8 "2016-05-09T16:52:00Z")
I would prefer you to use the 4K/60Hz so I can increase my KDR if we run into each other on the battlefield. ---
**Author:** ![xthefizzx](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/x/6a8cbe/32.png) [@xthefizzx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/xthefizzx)\ **Post date:** [May 9, 2016, 7:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/9 "2016-05-09T19:20:00Z")
As most have said already, 1440p 144hz . IMO, The ability to keep it smooth outweighs the benefits of the resolution, especially on desktop monitor. ---
**Author:** ![Sgt-Sph1ncter](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/5fc32e/32.png) [@Sgt-Sph1ncter](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sgt-Sph1ncter)\ **Post date:** [May 9, 2016, 9:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/10 "2016-05-09T21:49:00Z")
I really wish Asus or Acer would come out with a 4k IPS panel that wasn’t locked at 60hz already. I also have a 1440p 144hz gsync monitor and love it, but am dying to game at 4k. B) ---
**Author:** ![Madeguy25](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/madeguy25/32/102712_2.png) [@Madeguy25](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Madeguy25)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 2:28am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/11 "2016-05-10T02:28:00Z")
144hz all day ---
**Author:** ![Revelene](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e19adc/32.png) [@Revelene](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Revelene)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 6:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/12 "2016-05-10T18:23:00Z")
I’m currently running with a 1440p 165hz GSYNC monitor. Will be using it with BF1 as well. While 4K looks great… I still don’t find it viable for gaming just yet. Too much power to run smoothly. 1440p looks amazing already and feels great at high refresh rates. ---
**Author:** ![xxxCoOlBr33zExxx](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/x/da6949/32.png) [@xxxCoOlBr33zExxx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/xxxCoOlBr33zExxx)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 7:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/13 "2016-05-10T19:15:00Z")
> [@Revelene](#): > > I’m currently running with a 1440p 165hz GSYNC monitor. Will be using it with BF1 as well. > > While 4K looks great… I still don’t find it viable for gaming just yet. Too much power to run smoothly. 1440p looks amazing already and feels great at high refresh rates. Acer Predator by chance? ---
**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 7:33pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/14 "2016-05-10T19:33:00Z")
Will it be possible to play battlefield 1 on the new playstation neo? ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 7:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/15 "2016-05-10T19:47:00Z")
> [@Brentlostak](#): > > Will it be possible to play battlefield 1 on the new playstation neo? You mean the console that isn’t even confirmed to be real? ---
**Author:** ![dustinr26](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dustinr26/32/104833_2.png) [@dustinr26](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/dustinr26)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 7:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/16 "2016-05-10T19:51:00Z")
I think 1440p 144hz is sweet spot right now ---
**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 7:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/17 "2016-05-10T19:54:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > [@Brentlostak](#): > > > > Will it be possible to play battlefield 1 on the new playstation neo? > > You mean the console that isn’t even confirmed to be real? so its still a rumour, google is bursting with news about the playstation neo. ---
**Author:** ![Revelene](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e19adc/32.png) [@Revelene](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Revelene)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 8:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/18 "2016-05-10T20:20:00Z")
> [@xxxCoOlBr33zExxx](#): > > > [@Revelene](#): > > > > I’m currently running with a 1440p 165hz GSYNC monitor. Will be using it with BF1 as well. > > > > While 4K looks great… I still don’t find it viable for gaming just yet. Too much power to run smoothly. 1440p looks amazing already and feels great at high refresh rates. > > Acer Predator by chance? Yup. XB271HU. ---
**Author:** ![Zee\_Ace](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/e8c25b/32.png) [@Zee\_Ace](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Zee_Ace)\ **Post date:** [May 10, 2016, 10:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/1440p-144hz-vs-4k-60hz-for-battlefield-1/103802/19 "2016-05-10T22:25:00Z")
Yeah, 1440 @144 is the sweet spot. I enjoy the smoothness and responsivness more than my 44k @60.