Well I took video of BF4,BF1 and Hardline versus BF5 for 5+ open spots for conquest servers a few weeks back. BF5 had more then them 3 games combined. That’s just conquest on XBOX1 USA region.
Yeah I posted its held behind the delayed 4.4 patch. But the forum monster ate my post. We do get the anti material weapon next week if no more delays. This week we get the hat and goggles. They exclude the gas mask though.
The 3 weapons are trapped in the delayed 4.4 patch. They must of had the hat and goggles hid in the files to release as a emergency back up. After the hat that tweet mentioned the anti material weapon.
I wouldn’t take any notice what Dice puts out anymore, all this is an excuse to throw their customers off, to make us believe the original plans were inaccurate. i mean don’t they look at content and info as it is released to the community, case they do. They know exactly whats going on, they just won’t tell us the truth.
What Dice/EA need is a lawsuit to bring them back into line as they’re getting away with fraud.
I don’t think you would get far with a lawsuit, with the live service business model the game developer/publisher can chop and change what you get, in the small print of the road map it says “we hold the right to change the content” or words to that affect. You’re not guaranteed content like you got with premium, but hay it’s free!
I took a peak yesterday, and saw 97 servers that were full or had 1-5 free slots. That came in at 6200 on PC. I counted every TDM and SQC server though as 64 for convenience. Time stamp is important, that was at at 1:00am UTC, I believe.
Right now at 0:00 am UTC we are looking at 99 servers which again is 6000 players. Even if you double that for both consoles we are looking at 30k players. Certainly not 100k or anywhere close to be a relevant player in the shooter world.
What would be very embarassing is if BF4 overtakes BFV in player count. Its not far fetched at all, it’s close to being reality.
I know Twitch isn’t a great measure but viewer count is a good barometer for measuring interest in a game, so if you sort the game list by “shooter” games and BFV isn’t even in the top 20 shooter games in terms of viewer count then you should be embarrassed as a game studio and publisher.
I believe it has for quite some time now. More PC players on BF4 than on BF1 or BFV.
Even though I am not going to buy it, wait until that CoD modern Warfare come out and see how empty BFV gets.
The live service model works on games like World of Warcraft but not on a FPS that you have to buy a whole new game and chuck the old one every other year.
You get less and less with BFV but hey, it s all free! Don’t expect to much in 2020 with BFV.
You would have to take peak times of course, which is what we have for BF4 and 1, which sit at 7-10k players on PC. Very precise numbers. The BFV numbers are only guesswork and rough estimations, sice we can only count them via the server population. So you would need to take a look 8-9 pm UTC tonight and then compare it.
I am not doubting htat BFV has a higher playercount, I am doubting that the numbers are relevant for AAA title.
Let us make an optimistic guess and say that there are 10-12k players on PC at peak times and then look at what steamstats say about playercounts you would see that it is performing similarly to Age of Empires 2 HD released in 2013, and the Farming Simulator 2019 somewhere in the top 40 and excluding PC games on other platforms like Fortnite, Apex, FIFA etc.
.
Now that does not necessarily mean that BFV is a huge failure, since BF1 had similarily poor player retention for many reasons, but it does mean that there are a great plethora of games that are more enjoyable in all genres developed by really dedicated, pragmatic and economically efficient working teams. It does show that whatever DICE thought they were making is absolutely not what they released. It is just plain hybris.