# 64 player tdm with vehicles on full map

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [May 18, 2016, 2:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400 "2016-05-18T14:19:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Devlin345x](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/3e96dc/32.png) [@Devlin345x](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Devlin345x)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 2:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/1 "2016-05-18T14:19:00Z")

</div>

please make a 64 player tdm with vehicles on full map maybe you could make it so only two vehicles poer side could be used at once also no reason for conquest players to complain if you want to play conquest play conquest personally i think conquest ruins the fun as all everyone does is run around flags like headless chickens no one even sirs back and defends flags or at least bring back sqdm with vehicles

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 6:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/2 "2016-05-18T18:43:00Z")

</div>

Lel. That would function like conquest anyways.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Say\_Hellr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/say_hellr/32/103374_2.png) [@Say\_Hellr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Say_Hellr)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 7:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/3 "2016-05-18T19:13:00Z")

</div>

Honestly it be Conquest with no flags… There’d be no point in putting a game mode out like that if it’s a carbon copy of something else… There’d be no incentive in that round besides chasing kills “like headless chickens”.

**People actually do defend flag btw**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/eada6e/32.png) [@JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JuveOG1105)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 8:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/4 "2016-05-18T20:07:00Z")

</div>

This would be way worse plus where would everyone spawn? In base or on squad mates all the time? No thanks it’d be a show and garuntee you most games would end with some kind of spawn trapping.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![H-Hour\_Absolute](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/85f322/32.png) [@H-Hour\_Absolute](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/H-Hour_Absolute)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 9:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/5 "2016-05-18T21:12:00Z")

</div>

BC2 had this and the vehicle element was pretty fun.

And no it’s not conquest w/o flags, because in conquest you can exceed the other team in total kills, but still lose (ticket burn due to flags \> ticket burn due to kills).

If you haven’t tried TDM in BC2 (with vehicles), you don’t know what you’re missing out on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bhotdog](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/b782af/32.png) [@bhotdog](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bhotdog)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/6 "2016-05-18T22:35:00Z")

</div>

it would be sweet hope its like bf2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Spider](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ee59a6/32.png) [@Red\_Spider](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Red_Spider)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 11:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/7 "2016-05-19T11:12:00Z")

</div>

Why would TDM include vehicles, that’s basically conquest…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jihad\_Jockey](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jihad_jockey/32/102395_2.png) [@Jihad\_Jockey](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Jihad_Jockey)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 11:44am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/8 "2016-05-19T11:44:00Z")

</div>

It would be awful. The bigger game modes/full size maps have objectives for a reason.  
Tdm is played on small maps for a reason.

It would be a ghost town. Not just because it wouldnt be popular, but because even in a full server you would have absolutely no clue where to expect to find the enemy.

And no, kill farmers would not love the game mode. They would stick to conquest/rush and farm objectives and busy routes/hot areas of the map.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Devlin345x](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/3e96dc/32.png) [@Devlin345x](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Devlin345x)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 2:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/9 "2016-05-19T14:07:00Z")

</div>

well hopefully they put a vehicle or two into tdm or sqdn i like vehicles but dont like conquest or rush anymore

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Devlin345x](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/3e96dc/32.png) [@Devlin345x](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Devlin345x)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 2:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/10 "2016-05-19T14:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@Red\_Spider](#):
>
> Why would TDM include vehicles, that’s basically conquest…

no you see in conquest people run towards objectives then dont even sit back and defend objectives by just having a tdm it gets rid of the objective so people just concentrate on killing and a team can get more kills in conquest and still lose people

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Say\_Hellr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/say_hellr/32/103374_2.png) [@Say\_Hellr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Say_Hellr)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 8:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/64-player-tdm-with-vehicles-on-full-map/101400/11 "2016-05-19T20:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@Devlin345x](#):
>
> > [@Red\_Spider](#):
> >
> > Why would TDM include vehicles, that’s basically conquest…
> 
> no you see in conquest people run towards objectives then dont even sit back and defend objectives by just having a tdm it gets rid of the objective so people just concentrate on killing and a team can get more kills in conquest and still lose people

Why not just play regular TDM? TDM isn’t meant to be extraordinarily big… I don’t know where you’re getting your info from but a majority of players who see a flag burning **GO TO IT** to defend it..

And I don’t understand how long a match like that would be..
