# Active Radar has to GO

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [November 5, 2013, 6:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212 "2013-11-05T18:15:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/f0a364/32.png) [@iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iKickz-nM)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 6:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/1 "2013-11-05T18:15:00Z")

</div>

I wont explain why. Better yet, I’ll let you figure out why.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NuPe-ks](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/8e7dd6/32.png) [@NuPe-ks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/NuPe-ks)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 6:17pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/2 "2013-11-05T18:17:00Z")

</div>

yeh.. i feel dirty using it in the AA, and i think the stealth jet can it as well?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/f0a364/32.png) [@iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iKickz-nM)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 6:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/3 "2013-11-05T18:23:00Z")

</div>

I don’t understand what you mean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NuPe-ks](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/8e7dd6/32.png) [@NuPe-ks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/NuPe-ks)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 6:39pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/4 "2013-11-05T18:39:00Z")

</div>

active radar, isn’t it 2 missiles that behave like the LAW? pretty sure it was..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheNixNick](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ee59a6/32.png) [@TheNixNick](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TheNixNick)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 6:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/5 "2013-11-05T18:40:00Z")

</div>

It’s disgusting, should be removed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/f0a364/32.png) [@iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iKickz-nM)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 6:46pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/6 "2013-11-05T18:46:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _NuPe-ks said:_  
> active radar, isn’t it 2 missiles that behave like the LAW? pretty sure it was..

it’s 2 missiles that shoot with no drop. The reload almost instantly. They have infinite range. You dumbfire them into the general direction of an aircraft, and they are unavoidable. Also, they critical hit 100% chance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D2theRJ](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@D2theRJ](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/D2theRJ)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 7:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/7 "2013-11-05T19:03:00Z")

</div>

Sure, you can remove it just as soon as engineers are disallowed to repair helicopters mid flight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/f0a364/32.png) [@iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iKickz-nM)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 7:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/8 "2013-11-05T19:06:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _D2theRJ said:_  
> Sure, you can remove it just as soon as engineers are disallowed to repair helicopters mid flight.

what about jets and attack helis?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crazinski](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/977dab/32.png) [@Crazinski](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Crazinski)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 7:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/9 "2013-11-05T19:09:00Z")

</div>

they don’t have to go, it’s not like they’re mounted on a vehicle with a rather powerful wide elevation rotary autocannon or anything…wait.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D2theRJ](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@D2theRJ](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/D2theRJ)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 7:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/10 "2013-11-05T19:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _iKickz-nM said:_
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > _D2theRJ said:_  
> > Sure, you can remove it just as soon as engineers are disallowed to repair helicopters mid flight.
> 
> what about jets and attack helis?

Stealth jet needs major buffs to its armor and main cannon. Attack heli is fine apart from TV missiles and flare, maybe just decrease flare reload from 25 to 15 seconds. TV missile are an entirely different debate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rayskat](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/eada6e/32.png) [@Rayskat](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rayskat)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2013, 7:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/11 "2013-11-05T19:18:00Z")

</div>

Feeling salty because you can’t go on 100 killstreaks with jets anymore?  
I like the way half of my deaths aren’t from rocket pods spammed at my general direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![verysolidping](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/8e7dd6/32.png) [@verysolidping](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/verysolidping)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 7:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/12 "2013-11-06T19:48:00Z")

</div>

As much as I enjoy the Active Radar on AA, Yes i do agree that its WAYYYYY too powerful. Took out scout heli, attack heli then an aircraft all consecutively; they had absolutely no countermeasures against this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/f0a364/32.png) [@iKickz-nM](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iKickz-nM)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2013, 9:18am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/13 "2013-11-07T09:18:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _verysolidping said:_  
> As much as I enjoy the Active Radar on AA, Yes i do agree that its WAYYYYY too powerful. Took out scout heli, attack heli then an aircraft all consecutively; they had absolutely no countermeasures against this.

Indeed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nirnad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/49beb7/32.png) [@Nirnad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Nirnad)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2013, 9:35am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/active-radar-has-to-go/164212/14 "2013-11-07T09:35:00Z")

</div>

I love to play AA but I feel a little guilty using them. But if they nerf them, and they should, engi repair on scout helis has to be tuned down. And attack choppers need a huge defense buff…
