# Anybody nervous they won't deliver on bf1? **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 11, 2016, 12:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788 "2016-06-11T12:34:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/4491bb/32.png) [@TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TheStrategist242)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2016, 12:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788/1 "2016-06-11T12:34:00Z")
I know dice didn’t do hard-line but it still sucks and battlefront is a terrible game with over priced dlc way to casual and no content what so ever. I love bf franchise I hope they turn things around. I’m glad they had the ball sac to try something new but I don’t know ww1 doesn’t look to fun especially if they try to make it as authentic as possible. They shoulda went with cold war era. ---
**Author:** ![Ameeba37](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ameeba37/32/101194_2.png) [@Ameeba37](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Ameeba37)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2016, 1:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788/2 "2016-06-11T13:06:00Z")
I wouldn’t be too worried. DICE can take a lot more creative liberties than with SWBF. The Star Wars theme and Disney probably made DICE to sacrifice gameplay elements for maximum authenticity. SWBF’s target audience was massive and included a lot of people that normally don’t even play shooters. It’s super casual because it has to appeal to so many people. Battlefield is not a war simulator by any means and it’s not trying to be realistic. Gameplay \> realism. We’ll know more after EA Play though. ---
**Author:** ![bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bananahead81/32/101282_2.png) [@bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bananahead81)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2016, 1:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788/3 "2016-06-11T13:12:00Z")
I hope DICE make use of their full potential. They have the ability to make something amazing I’m sure of it. ---
**Author:** ![TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/4491bb/32.png) [@TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TheStrategist242)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2016, 2:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788/4 "2016-06-11T14:10:00Z")
> [@Ameeba37](#): > > I wouldn’t be too worried. DICE can take a lot more creative liberties than with SWBF. The Star Wars theme and Disney probably made DICE to sacrifice gameplay elements for maximum authenticity. SWBF’s target audience was massive and included a lot of people that normally don’t even play shooters. It’s super casual because it has to appeal to so many people. > > Battlefield is not a war simulator by any means and it’s not trying to be realistic. Gameplay \> realism. > > We’ll know more after EA Play though. I know it’s not a simulator but things like in ww1 parachutes were not considered beneficial so they weren’t used. There was almost no scopes . attachments were very limited I just hope they don’t care about stuff like that and put it in anyways Germans built almost no tanks. ---
**Author:** ![Ameeba37](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ameeba37/32/101194_2.png) [@Ameeba37](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Ameeba37)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2016, 2:32pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788/5 "2016-06-11T14:32:00Z")
> [@TheStrategist242](#): > > > [@Ameeba37](#): > > > > I wouldn’t be too worried. DICE can take a lot more creative liberties than with SWBF. The Star Wars theme and Disney probably made DICE to sacrifice gameplay elements for maximum authenticity. SWBF’s target audience was massive and included a lot of people that normally don’t even play shooters. It’s super casual because it has to appeal to so many people. > > > > Battlefield is not a war simulator by any means and it’s not trying to be realistic. Gameplay \> realism. > > > > We’ll know more after EA Play though. > > I know it’s not a simulator but things like in ww1 parachutes were not considered beneficial so they weren’t used. There was almost no scopes . attachments were very limited I just hope they don’t care about stuff like that and put it in anyways Germans built almost no tanks. I’m pretty sure there will be a lot of prototype stage weapons and equipment. Even though a lot of things were not used that widely we’ll probably see a lot of then in the game. ---
**Author:** ![Avarik](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/avarik/32/101251_2.png) [@Avarik](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Avarik)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2016, 4:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/anybody-nervous-they-wont-deliver-on-bf1/101788/6 "2016-06-11T16:13:00Z")
We have a similar discussion taking place in this thread: [What worries you about BF1?](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-worries-you-about-bf1/101758) Please continue it there. Om nom nom thread.