# AT rifle need a nerf against infantry **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [September 9, 2019, 10:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278 "2019-09-09T22:19:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 17\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![n1ghtskynet](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/n1ghtskynet/32/106984_2.png) [@n1ghtskynet](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/n1ghtskynet)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:16pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/41 "2019-09-12T18:16:00Z")
No those rifle are fine because they are hard to use bolt action rifle are way better instead of asking DICE to nerf something try to counter it for example you should try to learn the hiding spots in maps and improve your game sense so campers won’t be a problem ---
**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/42 "2019-09-12T18:35:00Z")
could the AT rifles become OHK melee weapons instead with a slow swing? ---
**Author:** ![Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Woodlbrad)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/43 "2019-09-12T18:41:00Z")
> [@MrCamp121](#): > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > [@SirTerrible](#): > > > > > > Love being told to get good by someone with basically 1/3 my ability..These prone weapons are trash for gameplay. End of story. > > > > That’s a pretty bold statement coming from someone complaining about a couple guns assuming things Ic. Did you look up my stats or referring to someone else because I have almost 500hrs time played on just bfv alone. > > No offense…but playing a lot does not equate tp skill level. Hence ranks are meaningless No offense but someone should be good at a game after 400hrs of play time. I’ve been playing battlefield since it was on console ps3 days that’s well over 1500hrs of just battlefield alone not to mention other FPS games. I can assure you I’m above average with stats in the 1% for battlefield leaderboard. ---
**Author:** ![MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MrCamp121)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:46pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/44 "2019-09-12T18:46:00Z")
> [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > [@MrCamp121](#): > > > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > > > [@SirTerrible](#): > > > > > > > > Love being told to get good by someone with basically 1/3 my ability..These prone weapons are trash for gameplay. End of story. > > > > > > That’s a pretty bold statement coming from someone complaining about a couple guns assuming things Ic. Did you look up my stats or referring to someone else because I have almost 500hrs time played on just bfv alone. > > > > No offense…but playing a lot does not equate tp skill level. Hence ranks are meaningless > > No offense but someone should be good at a game after 400hrs of play time. I’ve been playing battlefield since it was on console ps3 days that’s well over 1500hrs of just battlefield alone not to mention other FPS games. No offense. But again play time means nothing. You could spend 1300 hrs hiding in a corner. Does that make someone good? No ---
**Author:** ![MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MrCamp121)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/45 "2019-09-12T18:47:00Z")
> [@Hawxxeye](#): > > could the AT rifles become OHK melee weapons instead with a slow swing? Id find it hilarious seeing this in action. Someone sneaks up behind an enemy just to pull out a rifle and hit him with it lol ---
**Author:** ![Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Woodlbrad)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/46 "2019-09-12T18:53:00Z")
> [@MrCamp121](#): > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > [@MrCamp121](#): > > > > > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > > > > > [@SirTerrible](#): > > > > > > > > > > Love being told to get good by someone with basically 1/3 my ability..These prone weapons are trash for gameplay. End of story. > > > > > > > > That’s a pretty bold statement coming from someone complaining about a couple guns assuming things Ic. Did you look up my stats or referring to someone else because I have almost 500hrs time played on just bfv alone. > > > > > > No offense…but playing a lot does not equate tp skill level. Hence ranks are meaningless > > > > No offense but someone should be good at a game after 400hrs of play time. I’ve been playing battlefield since it was on console ps3 days that’s well over 1500hrs of just battlefield alone not to mention other FPS games. > > No offense. But again play time means nothing. You could spend 1300 hrs hiding in a corner. Does that make someone good? No Guess you didn’t see my edit I’m in the top 1% in some stats that’s above average man lowest for class score is top 4% stats don’t lie battlefield is a casual game it’s not hard to do well. Quit being salty just because I don’t agree with you on a topic. ---
**Author:** ![MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MrCamp121)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 6:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/47 "2019-09-12T18:58:00Z")
> [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > [@MrCamp121](#): > > > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > > > [@MrCamp121](#): > > > > > > > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@SirTerrible](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > Love being told to get good by someone with basically 1/3 my ability..These prone weapons are trash for gameplay. End of story. > > > > > > > > > > That’s a pretty bold statement coming from someone complaining about a couple guns assuming things Ic. Did you look up my stats or referring to someone else because I have almost 500hrs time played on just bfv alone. > > > > > > > > No offense…but playing a lot does not equate tp skill level. Hence ranks are meaningless > > > > > > No offense but someone should be good at a game after 400hrs of play time. I’ve been playing battlefield since it was on console ps3 days that’s well over 1500hrs of just battlefield alone not to mention other FPS games. > > > > No offense. But again play time means nothing. You could spend 1300 hrs hiding in a corner. Does that make someone good? No > > Guess you didn’t see my edit I’m in the top 1% in some stats that’s above average man stats don’t lie battlefield is a casual game it’s not hard to do well. Quit being salty just because I don’t agree with you on a topic. And im top 0.1-0.4% on many on xbox. Whats your pt lol most stats are meaningless ---
**Author:** ![Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Woodlbrad)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 7:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/48 "2019-09-12T19:07:00Z")
> [@MrCamp121](#): > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > [@MrCamp121](#): > > > > > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > > > > > [@MrCamp121](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@Woodlbrad](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > [@SirTerrible](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love being told to get good by someone with basically 1/3 my ability..These prone weapons are trash for gameplay. End of story. > > > > > > > > > > > > That’s a pretty bold statement coming from someone complaining about a couple guns assuming things Ic. Did you look up my stats or referring to someone else because I have almost 500hrs time played on just bfv alone. > > > > > > > > > > No offense…but playing a lot does not equate tp skill level. Hence ranks are meaningless > > > > > > > > No offense but someone should be good at a game after 400hrs of play time. I’ve been playing battlefield since it was on console ps3 days that’s well over 1500hrs of just battlefield alone not to mention other FPS games. > > > > > > No offense. But again play time means nothing. You could spend 1300 hrs hiding in a corner. Does that make someone good? No > > > > Guess you didn’t see my edit I’m in the top 1% in some stats that’s above average man stats don’t lie battlefield is a casual game it’s not hard to do well. Quit being salty just because I don’t agree with you on a topic. > > And im top 0.1-0.4% on many on xbox. Whats your pt lol most stats are meaningless At rifles require the most skill for a primary that’s my point lol and you want it nerfed. Name something which requires more so I can laugh my off because you have no argument. ---
**Author:** ![Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Woodlbrad)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 7:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/49 "2019-09-12T19:24:00Z")
I’m just gonna use an At rifle if it makes ppl this salty crying for nerfs on the forum this is to much fun to pass up even tho bolts are far superior. ---
**Author:** ![ragnarok013](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ragnarok013/32/103211_2.png) [@ragnarok013](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ragnarok013)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 7:29pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/50 "2019-09-12T19:29:00Z")
Guys stop it with the baiting and stay on topic. ---
**Author:** ![TFBisquit](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/f07891/32.png) [@TFBisquit](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TFBisquit)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 7:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/51 "2019-09-12T19:50:00Z")
As far as personal performance go, with bad or busy isp routing, you won’t do as well as you’re used to. It’s an internet game after all, and you can overcome only so much. The AT rifles are bad in usage imo. All other guns achieve the same if not more, so why torture yourself using them? Then I’m also annoyed when killed by them, because every insta kill is disturbing. That doesn’t require an AT gun. ---
**Author:** ![Major\_Pungspark](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/6bbea6/32.png) [@Major\_Pungspark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Major_Pungspark)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2019, 8:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/52 "2019-09-12T20:07:00Z")
I am SO tired of being shot by not even a dot I could see in the pinkie and dying instantly. It is not like they are really aiming that hard because they just need to hit. I am not saying that I think it is a fantastic weapon but just some more lame crap that some challenged person thought would be a “cool” addition to the game. It is not, it is just another really irritating lame camper railgun. ---
**Author:** ![InS\_Hypno](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ins_hypno/32/106778_2.png) [@InS\_Hypno](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/InS_Hypno)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2019, 7:42am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/53 "2019-09-13T07:42:00Z")
Make it a gadget with lower ammo count Buff it against vehicule, nerf it against infantry That gun being a primary doesn’t make any sense ---
**Author:** ![DouglasO1986](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/e47774/32.png) [@DouglasO1986](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DouglasO1986)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2019, 3:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/54 "2019-09-13T15:44:00Z")
THERAMPAGE\_ci0h Get good softy. Tissues will be your best friend ---
**Author:** ![BURGERKRIEG](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/77aa72/32.png) [@BURGERKRIEG](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BURGERKRIEG)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2019, 5:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/55 "2019-09-13T17:21:00Z")
> [@InS\_Hypno](#): > > Make it a gadget with lower ammo count > > Buff it against vehicule, nerf it against infantry > > That gun being a primary doesn’t make any sense This. ---
**Author:** ![Major\_Pungspark](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/6bbea6/32.png) [@Major\_Pungspark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Major_Pungspark)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 8:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/56 "2019-09-14T20:44:00Z")
I think it is the single most annoying thing they could have added to the game, not counting possible nukes and stuff like that. I just wanna puke over the skill it takes to use it, and the I just wanna puke over the fact that I continue to play a game that keeps adding like that. ---
**Author:** ![Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Woodlbrad)\ **Post date:** [September 15, 2019, 11:14pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278/57 "2019-09-15T23:14:00Z")
AT rifles Reeeeeeeeeee! [Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/at-rifle-need-a-nerf-against-infantry/107278.md?page=2)