# Battlefield 1 REJECTED **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [May 18, 2016, 7:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408 "2016-05-18T19:51:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 7:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/1 "2016-05-18T19:51:00Z")
How would you feel if BF1 was rejected by EA the second time (and final rejection) and never shown, and instead another Modern or Future Battlefield, assuming most people here are excited for bf1.. ---
**Author:** ![zePokar1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/35a633/32.png) [@zePokar1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/zePokar1)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 8:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/2 "2016-05-18T20:52:00Z")
What do you mean ? I don’t get it. ---
**Author:** ![JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/eada6e/32.png) [@JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JuveOG1105)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 8:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/3 "2016-05-18T20:58:00Z")
Young long time no see still running a clan? ---
**Author:** ![Darkseedling](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/darkseedling/32/101637_2.png) [@Darkseedling](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Darkseedling)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 9:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/4 "2016-05-18T21:05:00Z")
I could not be bothered getting it. I learnt my lessons from previous EA titles. ---
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/5 "2016-05-18T22:06:00Z")
> [@JuveOG1105](#): > > Young long time no see still running a clan? will be for BF1 ---
**Author:** ![JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/eada6e/32.png) [@JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JuveOG1105)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:08pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/6 "2016-05-18T22:08:00Z")
> [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > > [@JuveOG1105](#): > > > > Young long time no see still running a clan? > > will be for BF1 Yeah definitely I wanted ww2 but I like the idea of a ww1 game since it’s almost never been touched. BTW it’s infidel1105. ---
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/7 "2016-05-18T22:09:00Z")
> [@zePokar1](#): > > What do you mean ? I don’t get it. if you didn’t know, BF1 was rejected the first time around when it was pitched to EA, but then after some developers fight to get it approved, they was finally given the green light to do BF1. ---
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/8 "2016-05-18T22:13:00Z")
> [@JuveOG1105](#): > > > [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > > > > [@JuveOG1105](#): > > > > > > Young long time no see still running a clan? > > > > will be for BF1 > > Yeah definitely I wanted ww2 but I like the idea of a ww1 game since it’s almost never been touched. BTW it’s infidel1105. Anything in the History books is A-OK for me. ---
**Author:** ![quicktiger](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/58f4c7/32.png) [@quicktiger](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/quicktiger)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/9 "2016-05-18T22:15:00Z")
> [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > How would you feel if BF1 was rejected by EA the second time (and final rejection) and never shown, and instead another Modern or Future Battlefield, assuming most people here are excited for bf1.. There is a contradiction in your statement .If it was never shown then we would never know it was rejected. Nonetheless I would have been disappointed if it turned out to be modern again. ---
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/10 "2016-05-18T22:19:00Z")
> [@quicktiger](#): > > > [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > > > How would you feel if BF1 was rejected by EA the second time (and final rejection) and never shown, and instead another Modern or Future Battlefield, assuming most people here are excited for bf1.. > > There is a contradiction in your statement .If it was never shown then we would never know it was rejected. Nonetheless I would have been disappointed if it turned out to be modern again. It’s a “What if” and if EA didn’t see what Dice was doing then it would have been rejected anyways, since EA follows the trend in most of their games…untill now, they made a smart decision to go back in time and make a bold move, in which they can breath now since it got more positive feedback then CODs future space themed halo game. ---
**Author:** ![zePokar1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/35a633/32.png) [@zePokar1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/zePokar1)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/11 "2016-05-18T22:51:00Z")
> [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > > [@zePokar1](#): > > > > What do you mean ? I don’t get it. > > if you didn’t know, BF1 was rejected the first time around when it was pitched to EA, but then after some developers fight to get it approved, they was finally given the green light to do BF1. Ah, I wasn’t aware. ---
**Author:** ![DANNYonPC](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/f19dbf/32.png) [@DANNYonPC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DANNYonPC)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/12 "2016-05-18T22:55:00Z")
Happy they made a little demo for the guys over at EA, and the likes on the YT vid show we’re ready aswell ---
**Author:** ![Benny9393](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/benny9393/32/101317_2.png) [@Benny9393](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Benny9393)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/13 "2016-05-18T23:05:00Z")
I wish they’d rejected it this time. I have this feeling that it’s going to feel so gimmicky. Which isn’t particularly down to the time period, although I feel because it’s world war 1 they’ve had to take more artistic liberties to make it work and this will in turn make it feel more goofy and silly than previous battlefields (except Hardline). ---
**Author:** ![MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f14d63/32.png) [@MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MegaloDorian)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 4:01am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/14 "2016-05-19T04:01:00Z")
I would’ve been pretty “meh” about the game if it was just going to be another modern setting or a futuristic setting. I think the overwhelmingly positive feedback the trailer had means that DICE did something quite right in at least the marketing department. ---
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 9:29am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/15 "2016-05-19T09:29:00Z")
I would honestly be very disappointed on Dice for going to the future warfare or another modern warfare type game. As we have enough of them and a good change is needed in the current gen we are in. But depending on what it could have been, I may have just gave it a try and if I felt it was like the other games then I would just move on from FPS untill a game came out like what BF1 is like now. ---
**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 10:00am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/16 "2016-05-19T10:00:00Z")
I think if battlefield 1 would be rejected, nobody would know. maybe some years later in an interview with lars or someone else from dice. > [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > I would honestly be very disappointed on Dice for going to the future warfare or another modern warfare type game. As we have enough of them and a good change is needed in the current gen we are in. But depending on what it could have been, I may have just gave it a try and if I felt it was like the other games then I would just move on from FPS untill a game came out like what BF1 is like now. How do you know what battlefield 1 is going to be ? And you know there are games allready that are set in world war 1… well for pc there are games [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_World\_War\_I\_video\_games](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_I_video_games) ---
**Author:** ![YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/youngsoldier_trt/32/104167_2.png) [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/YoungSoldier_TRT)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 3:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/17 "2016-05-19T15:55:00Z")
> [@Brentlostak](#): > > I think if battlefield 1 would be rejected, nobody would know. maybe some years later in an interview with lars or someone else from dice. > > > [@YoungSoldier\_TRT](#): > > > > I would honestly be very disappointed on Dice for going to the future warfare or another modern warfare type game. As we have enough of them and a good change is needed in the current gen we are in. But depending on what it could have been, I may have just gave it a try and if I felt it was like the other games then I would just move on from FPS untill a game came out like what BF1 is like now. > > How do you know what battlefield 1 is going to be ? And you know there are games allready that are set in world war 1… well for pc there are games [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_World\_War\_I\_video\_games](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_I_video_games) how do i know? ummm, did you not read any info on bf1??? and again, people its a “What if?”…obviously we know now but again, what if it didnt come out the way it is now set in WW…& im speaking on console gen, not pc… ---
**Author:** ![Sazabinitengale](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/0ea827/32.png) [@Sazabinitengale](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sazabinitengale)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 7:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/18 "2016-05-19T19:03:00Z")
I would love for it to be something near 2143. 2142 to me was the best so far and I want a continuation of it! WW1 has me thinking “meh”, may be skipping this title if beta doesn’t wow me. ---
**Author:** ![S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/s1ngular1ty/32/103340_2.png) [@S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/S1ngular1ty)\ **Post date:** [May 20, 2016, 4:51am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/19 "2016-05-20T04:51:00Z")
It should have been rejected. ---
**Author:** ![Toxicity922](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/toxicity922/32/103873_2.png) [@Toxicity922](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Toxicity922)\ **Post date:** [May 20, 2016, 7:51am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408/20 "2016-05-20T07:51:00Z")
I would have played it either way. That being said, while I thought the BF1 trailer was amazing I was a little apprehensive about the WW1 setting. It has since opened my eyes to the possibles, and appears to be pointed in the right direction to deliver an experience that is unique and fresh. [Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-rejected/101408.md?page=2)