# Battlefield 1 Soldier Image leaked **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 12, 2016, 7:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825 "2016-06-12T19:21:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/1 "2016-06-12T19:21:00Z")
Looks to be a female recon? [https://battlefieldforum.net/index.php?threads/battlefield-1-soldier-image.317/](https://battlefieldforum.net/index.php?threads/battlefield-1-soldier-image.317/) ---
**Author:** ![CAPT\_Gangplank](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/eb9ed0/32.png) [@CAPT\_Gangplank](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CAPT_Gangplank)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/2 "2016-06-12T19:24:00Z")
Sweet pic. Some people will be very happy, assuming this is legit. Could be campaign tho. ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:27pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/3 "2016-06-12T19:27:00Z")
> [@CAPT\_Gangplank](#): > > Sweet pic. Some people will be very happy, assuming this is legit. Could be campaign tho. Source is straight from an EA PDF. ---
**Author:** ![Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rev0verDrive)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:32pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/4 "2016-06-12T19:32:00Z")
Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/5 "2016-06-12T19:35:00Z")
> [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) That is an anti-tank rifle? Wow! ---
**Author:** ![Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rev0verDrive)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:38pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/6 "2016-06-12T19:38:00Z")
> [@Timelord1969](#): > > > [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > > > Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) > > That is an anti-tank rifle? Wow! 13mm … look at the barrel on that thing. ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:38pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/7 "2016-06-12T19:38:00Z")
> [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > > > [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > > > > > Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) > > > > That is an anti-tank rifle? Wow! > > 13mm … look at the barrel on that thing. Not disagreeing - just impressed… Anyone think that the solider is female? ---
**Author:** ![S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/s1ngular1ty/32/103340_2.png) [@S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/S1ngular1ty)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:39pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/8 "2016-06-12T19:39:00Z")
Bipod on rifle, se > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > > > Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) > > That is an anti-tank rifle? Wow! Tanks in WW1 had thin armor so rifles could actually penetrate the armor. ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/9 "2016-06-12T19:42:00Z")
> [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > Bipod on rifle, se > > > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > > > [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > > > > > Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) > > > > That is an anti-tank rifle? Wow! > > Tanks in WW1 had thin armor so rifles could actually penetrate the armor. Hence the caliber? ---
**Author:** ![Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rev0verDrive)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/10 "2016-06-12T19:44:00Z")
> [@Timelord1969](#): > > > [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > > > Bipod on rifle, se > > > > > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > > > > > [@Rev0verDrive](#): > > > > > > > > Recon with a Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr (anti-tank rifle) > > > > > > That is an anti-tank rifle? Wow! > > > > Tanks in WW1 had thin armor so rifles could actually penetrate the armor. > > Hence the caliber? The Mark V tank had 16mm maximum front, 12mm sides, 8mm roof and “belly”. ---
**Author:** ![S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/s1ngular1ty/32/103340_2.png) [@S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/S1ngular1ty)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/11 "2016-06-12T19:44:00Z")
13mm is just .50 cal basically. The armor back then was terribad. That gun isn’t super powerful. ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:46pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/12 "2016-06-12T19:46:00Z")
> [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > 13mm is just .50 cal basically. The armor back then was terribad. That gun isn’t super powerful. .50 cal is still a monster ---
**Author:** ![S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/s1ngular1ty/32/103340_2.png) [@S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/S1ngular1ty)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/13 "2016-06-12T19:48:00Z")
> [@Timelord1969](#): > > > [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > > > 13mm is just .50 cal basically. The armor back then was terribad. That gun isn’t super powerful. > > .50 cal is still a monster But poses no threat to most modern tanks or APCs. WW1 vehicles are terrible. ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/14 "2016-06-12T19:50:00Z")
> [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > > > [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > > > > > 13mm is just .50 cal basically. The armor back then was terribad. That gun isn’t super powerful. > > > > .50 cal is still a monster > > But poses no threat to most modern tanks or APCs. WW1 vehicles are terrible. Agreed, good thing it is a screenshot from a game based in WWI 😉 ---
**Author:** ![S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/s1ngular1ty/32/103340_2.png) [@S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/S1ngular1ty)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/15 "2016-06-12T19:52:00Z")
> [@Timelord1969](#): > > > [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > > > > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > > > > > [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > > > > > > > 13mm is just .50 cal basically. The armor back then was terribad. That gun isn’t super powerful. > > > > > > .50 cal is still a monster > > > > But poses no threat to most modern tanks or APCs. WW1 vehicles are terrible. > > Agreed, good thing it is a screenshot from a game based in WWI 😉 Not really cause it is in WW1. ---
**Author:** ![Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/278dde/32.png) [@Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Vespervin1)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/16 "2016-06-12T19:52:00Z")
> [@Timelord1969](#): > > Looks to be a female recon? > > [https://battlefieldforum.net/index.php?threads/battlefield-1-soldier-image.317/](https://battlefieldforum.net/index.php?threads/battlefield-1-soldier-image.317/) Thanks for sharing! ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/17 "2016-06-12T19:54:00Z")
> [@Vespervin](#): > > > [@Timelord1969](#): > > > > Looks to be a female recon? > > > > [https://battlefieldforum.net/index.php?threads/battlefield-1-soldier-image.317/](https://battlefieldforum.net/index.php?threads/battlefield-1-soldier-image.317/) > > Thanks for sharing! You are welcome! ---
**Author:** ![Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/278dde/32.png) [@Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Vespervin1)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 7:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/18 "2016-06-12T19:55:00Z")
Here’s the deploy screen: ![ygicRb0.jpg](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/9/0/90fdf518d2d288aa27e0f645620e2831cc8d7893.jpeg) ---
**Author:** ![Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Timelord1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Timelord1969)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 8:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/19 "2016-06-12T20:12:00Z")
Thanks for posting it ---
**Author:** ![HaveThisRocket](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/7bcc69/32.png) [@HaveThisRocket](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HaveThisRocket)\ **Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 8:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825/20 "2016-06-12T20:41:00Z")
I hope it’s not a female soldier.Or if it is,she’s only playable in single player as a character [Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-1-soldier-image-leaked/101825.md?page=2)