# Battlefield for (almost) Everyone

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [May 16, 2016, 3:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351 "2016-05-16T15:10:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 3:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/1 "2016-05-16T15:10:00Z")

</div>

The communty is deeply devided. My suggestion; three different games. For almost everyone a Battlefield…  
Battlefield: Main Game, Battlefield: Duty Calls, Battlefield: Good Company  
These three titles don’t exists but are concept names. This is a release cycle to cater to the huge Battlefield community;  
Year 1: Battlefield: Main Game  
Singleplayer;  
This tells a serious story well written. A singleplayer that is more close to the multiplayer but yet a typical singleplayer. A Gritty, dark, mature game.  
Multiplayer;  
This is more close to the origins of Battlefield. It stays truthfull to games like battlefield1942, Battlefield: Vietnam and Battlefield 2. It has more hardcore gamemechanics. Easy to learn, hard to master’  
It is more stratigic game where cunningnes and strategic thinking is awarded and not the cheap. It continues to innovate but gamemechanics will be simple. Motivation to play this, is the game itself and not points, status, meaningless ranks, meaningless stats, battlepacks, tons of weapons, tons of sights. Huge emphasis on teamplay. Gameplay focused equal around all aspect of warfare; Sea, land and air. It’s a game where DICE can create art without EA’s restrictions.  
No auto vehicle regen, No auto health regen, No Suppression etc (basicly everything that ‘old school’ players hate)

Community of this game;

This is the baseline of the communty. A community that is maybe not the biggest money market but they are extremely loyal. Give them modsupport and they will bring beautiful user generated content that brings gaming to a further level. They are smart and innovative and bring the Battlefield as a franchise to a further plan. At first glance this market is a secondary market but are willing to pay ‘big money’ at a later stage! Extremely loyal fans. So this game keeps the community alive. Game for a longterm strategy. Generates steady cash flow.

Year 2: The year for Battlefield: Codename Duty Calls…

Singleplayer;

More based on popular culture…  
It basically goes head to head with Call of duty.

Multiplayer;

Based on Battlefield 4 and Hardline. Allout warfare; land,sea and air but slighty light emphasis on infantry. Maps like Arica Harbour, Metro, Locker are templates. Rewards in the form of points, ranks, weapons, gadget unlocks weapons customisation etc  
Lots of explosions, hooah shouting, gung ho gameplay. Twich gameplay  
It has Auto health, Auto regen vehicles. And…Grab the ‘ammobox/medbag’ out of the bag of your teamate because he is to occupied boosting his KD to play his class. Cheap gets rewarded Sniper camping, noobtubes, c4 jeeps etc. Teamplay is still important and stimulated but solostic gameplay is not punished severly.

Community;

Huge money market. Is not loyal to franchise. Jumps at the first sight of another HypeTrain. Great for EA to completily milk out and for DICE to experiment new concepts on.  
Huge market at first sight. Cash flow can fluctuate due to concurenting games.

Year 3: Battlefield :Good Company…  
Singleplayer;

More a lighthearted story with same principles as above. Singleplayer 2.0 [url=“http:.com/en-us/discussion/672/singleplayer-2-0ttps://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/d[https://forums.battlefi”]http:.com/en-us/discussion/672/singleplayer-2-0ttps://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/dhttps://forums.battlefi[/url]but](https://forums.battlefi%22%5Dhttp:.com/en-us/discussion/672/singleplayer-2-0ttps://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/dhttps://forums.battlefi%5B/url%5Dbut) with lots of humor! Template is the Bad Company series. Easier to make than a serious story. Give actors a framework and let them improvise. Great and free content! Setting could be fantasy or authentic. There is always humor even in something as terrible as war. As long it is done in a respectful way.

Multiplayer;

Based around Battlefield Bad Company series. Is fun in a way for everyone in the community.

Community;

A game that compells to both ends of the community. Brings the community closer together

Yours sincerely, Snavelaer

P.S; A dedicate this article to my best gamefriends and Brother in Arms Nelsam, Pni, Happy, Mercury, Layzan, Dailyjunk, DrPepper111 en others \<3

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JadedJunglist](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jadedjunglist/32/102351_2.png) [@JadedJunglist](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JadedJunglist)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 3:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/2 "2016-05-16T15:13:00Z")

</div>

wheres the thesis?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 3:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/3 "2016-05-16T15:21:00Z")

</div>

I don’t know I though that would sound cool.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JadedJunglist](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jadedjunglist/32/102351_2.png) [@JadedJunglist](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JadedJunglist)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/4 "2016-05-16T15:22:00Z")

</div>

just curious with your references to bad company. are you seeking comic relief for this ww1 game?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avarik](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/avarik/32/101251_2.png) [@Avarik](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Avarik)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 3:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/5 "2016-05-16T15:25:00Z")

</div>

To be fair, whichever way DICE will choose, there will always be someone who’s not happy. :l

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 3:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/6 "2016-05-16T15:43:00Z")

</div>

> [@Avarik](#):
>
> To be fair, whichever way DICE will choose, there will always be someone who’s not happy. :l

True, you can’t make everyone happy!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 4:30pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/7 "2016-05-16T16:30:00Z")

</div>

> [@JadedJunglist](#):
>
> just curious with your references to bad company. are you seeking comic relief for this ww1 game?

I am afraid Battlefield will be dead serious. By the look of the artstyle I am pessimistic.  
But comic could be easily done in a ww1 setting. Comic relief is always done in serious stories.

> [@Avarik](#):
>
> To be fair, whichever way DICE will choose, there will always be someone who’s not happy. :l

As Oddbal would say; Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves?! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JadedJunglist](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jadedjunglist/32/102351_2.png) [@JadedJunglist](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JadedJunglist)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 5:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/8 "2016-05-16T17:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@snavelaer](#):
>
> I am afraid Battlefield will be dead serious. By the look of the artstyle I am pessimistic.  
> But comic could be easily done in a ww1 setting. Comic relief is always done in serious stories.

i assume the script is written already. but in all honesty id enjoy a bad company approach in the campaign, at least in the prologue. couple friends happy to serve their country before they realize just how grim reality is in which the story gets progressively more serious as time goes on

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 8:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/9 "2016-05-16T20:54:00Z")

</div>

> [@JadedJunglist](#):
>
> > [@snavelaer](#):
> >
> > I am afraid Battlefield will be dead serious. By the look of the artstyle I am pessimistic.  
> > But comic could be easily done in a ww1 setting. Comic relief is always done in serious stories.
> 
> i assume the script is written already. but in all honesty id enjoy a bad company approach in the campaign, at least in the prologue. couple friends happy to serve their country before they realize just how grim reality is in which the story gets progressively more serious as time goes on

Never thought of that. Good suggestion!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 8:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/10 "2016-05-16T20:58:00Z")

</div>

> [@JadedJunglist](#):
>
> wheres the thesis?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 10:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/11 "2016-05-16T22:41:00Z")

</div>

> [@Sir-xer21](#):
>
> > [@JadedJunglist](#):
> >
> > wheres the thesis?

You like the Battlefield: Duty Calls right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 10:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/12 "2016-05-16T22:42:00Z")

</div>

im actually just fully sonfused as to the point you’re getting across, because, you know, there’s no actual thesis. its just three random ideas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 10:59pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/13 "2016-05-16T22:59:00Z")

</div>

Changed the name and edited the intro.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 2:16am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/14 "2016-06-12T02:16:00Z")

</div>

Hugely edited post.  
Battlefield; Duty calls is the entry-level Battlefield. From there you can ‘grow’ into Battlefield; Good Company or even Battlefield; The main game. If you didn’t like Battlefield; The main game you can go back to Good Company or Duty Calls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The-Rival-07](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/aeb1de/32.png) [@The-Rival-07](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/The-Rival-07)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 2:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/15 "2016-06-12T02:31:00Z")

</div>

It would be awesome to put quickscoping into Battlefield main game ,just imagine the amount of skill required to quickscope through huge maps .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rev0verDrive)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 2:44am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/16 "2016-06-12T02:44:00Z")

</div>

> [@The-Rival-07](#):
>
> It would be awesome to put quickscoping into Battlefield main game ,just imagine the amount of skill required to quickscope through huge maps .

Play UT/Quake if you want hitscan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GnomeScat](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/gnomescat/32/102080_2.png) [@GnomeScat](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GnomeScat)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2016, 4:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-for-almost-everyone/101351/17 "2016-06-12T04:46:00Z")

</div>

Let’s just stop at year 1.
