The Pacific will be delayed that is a guarantee. Starting September Battlefield will start to lose players drastically.
Borderlands 3 in September then COD MW in October. It will be a graveyard by November.
that’s not the consensus here : Modern warfare sucks BF has nothing to worry about
Indeed. Thank God that Modern Warfare is going to release with only a couple of maps and one 2V2 game mode.
I don’t necessarily mean it will be a bad game though, At least for comp players they will have something new to take their attention away from BFV.
On the flipside, Perhaps BFV will benefit from players migrating ( as horrible as it sounds ) and we’ll have fewer blueberries plaguing the game.
Pfffff haha I guess that’s what the developers at dice say to each other .
The truth is that it is a far superior game in it’s alfa than battlefield v after so much time .
Why are you here then and not playing COD Alpha?
I mean, If it’s so great and all, I would not be typing on the competitors forum, I would be.. y’know.. enjoying it.
I am playing it but sadly it’s just an alpha .
And it ends today , im looking forward for the full game .
You do know a LOT can change between Alpha and Beta builds, Right?
Also, You do realise that the new COD will have had 3 years of development time as opposed to BFV’s year or so.
The last game developed by Infinity ward was back in 2016, Which was : Infinite warfare.
The following games have been developed by different devs.
- Call of duty WW2 was developed by sledgehammer games
- Call of duty : BO4 was developed by Treyarch
- Call of duty : MW is being developed by infinity ward.
I guess that means BFV should have been 1/3 the price of MW at release then, yes?
LOLGotYerTags said:
You do know a LOT can change between Alpha and Beta builds, Right?
Also, You do realise that the new COD will have had 3 years of development time as opposed to BFV’s year or so.
The last game developed by Infinity ward was back in 2016, Which was : Infinite warfare.
The following games have been developed by different devs.
- Call of duty WW2 was developed by sledgehammer games
- Call of duty : BO4 was developed by Treyarch
- Call of duty : MW is being developed by infinity ward.
We’ll see what people are saying when the game fully launches.
Yes Exactly battlefield v was a rushed game and shouldn’t have passed the alpha phase in it’s current form.
Even after all this updates, it’s still full of bugs . I mean just look at the graphics in battlefield 1 and then compare it to battlefield v , it will feel like a downgrade.
I really think that all the game-play-changes Dice made for BFV wouldn’t have mattered as much, if the game worked well. But unfortunately the game still has so many quality-issues (UI, sound, movement, visibility, netcode, stutters, lack/delay of content etc etc etc). They can still save the game, but they have still lost a lot of players that will be very hard to get back.
And what about the next BF-game. I wonder how many customers they have lost, by launching BFV in a such a bad state and making a lot of people feel like they wasted their time and money on a half-finished game.
I’ve seen many hyped conversations over the years about new games versus older ones. And usually the hype was just hype.
But in this case you get a new shooter, which will likely attract more customers than bfv can after 1 year. It’s on sale since a month after release so that’s not going to help anymore either.
But I disagree on the topic title. The player base is reasonably stable now, those won’t quit overnight, and the new cod might bring what many hope for, but the core players will still be here.
As for the how’s and why’s in bfv, it’s too much hardcore, the majority chokes on that. And when a game induces anger, many will call it quits, as we’ve already seen over the months.
From that thread you come to that conclusion
How’s that even possible!