# Battlefield VS Battlefield

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [May 18, 2016, 10:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396 "2016-05-18T10:52:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 10:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/1 "2016-05-18T10:52:00Z")

</div>

The community is deeply splitted  
Why? I guess because on one side of the Battlefield people want a more; “Project Reality” expierence and on the other side of The Battlefield a more; Call of Duty expience. Can they coexist and how? Or will it be a brutal slaughter where one of them gets defeated?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:05am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/2 "2016-05-18T11:05:00Z")

</div>

it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/3 "2016-05-18T11:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@Brentlostak](#):
>
> it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !

It’s pointed out by me rather black and white. There is also grey ofcourse. But are you more PR or CoD?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/4 "2016-05-18T11:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@snavelaer](#):
>
> > [@Brentlostak](#):
> >
> > it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !
> 
> It’s pointed out by me rather black and white. There is also grey ofcourse. But are you more PR or CoD?

i’m a battlefield player. not project reality or cod player…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:20am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/5 "2016-05-18T11:20:00Z")

</div>

> [@Brentlostak](#):
>
> > [@snavelaer](#):
> >
> > > [@Brentlostak](#):
> > >
> > > it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !
> > 
> > It’s pointed out by me rather black and white. There is also grey ofcourse. But are you more PR or CoD?
> 
> i’m a battlefield player. not project reality or cod player…

So you like all the Battlefields evenly

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:22am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/6 "2016-05-18T11:22:00Z")

</div>

> [@Brentlostak](#):
>
> > [@snavelaer](#):
> >
> > > [@Brentlostak](#):
> > >
> > > it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !
> > 
> > It’s pointed out by me rather black and white. There is also grey ofcourse. But are you more PR or CoD?
> 
> i’m a battlefield player. not project reality or cod player…

This also begs the question, which battlefield player are you? The earlier ones that started the franchise? The mid way guys? Or the new ones who just in the last two games became a “battlefield player” Bc the games and the playstyles differ greatly.

This isn’t necessarily aimed at just you. But more of a general question

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:24am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/7 "2016-05-18T11:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@snavelaer](#):
>
> > [@Brentlostak](#):
> >
> > > [@snavelaer](#):
> > >
> > > > [@Brentlostak](#):
> > > >
> > > > it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !
> > > 
> > > It’s pointed out by me rather black and white. There is also grey ofcourse. But are you more PR or CoD?
> > 
> > i’m a battlefield player. not project reality or cod player…
> 
> So you like all the Battlefields evenly

bf3 was less fun then the others, why i don’t know it got boring very fast for some reason!

@visegrip117 : I started with 1942 on pc. after a while i started on the console with bad company 1 and never left the console

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kinkykevin1927](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/4da419/32.png) [@Kinkykevin1927](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Kinkykevin1927)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:27am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/8 "2016-05-18T11:27:00Z")

</div>

OP is the communtiy deeply split? I dont see it. Ive seen very few chuck their toys out over this, most people seem excited

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lexman61](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/lexman61/32/102635_2.png) [@lexman61](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/lexman61)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/9 "2016-05-18T11:31:00Z")

</div>

The reality is that DICE & EA after several commercially successful games must now try to satisfy a very broad and varied audience besides the original PC players. Everything ranging from the young teenager, the COD crowd, BF veterans, hardcore aficionados, super casual players, etc. etc. must be taken into consideration.

This of corse increases the “risk” of unsatisfactory compromises in trying to please everybody but they have no choice. Alienating any of the above mentioned groups has a cost. The question then becomes, if you can’t satisfy everybody which customer group can you afford to “loose”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/10 "2016-05-18T11:34:00Z")

</div>

> [@lexman61](#):
>
> The reality is that DICE & EA after several commercially successful games must now try to satisfy a very broad and varied audience besides the original PC players. Everything ranging from the young teenager, the COD crowd, BF veterans, hardcore aficionados, super casual players, etc. etc. must be taken into consideration.
> 
> This of corse increases the “risk” of unsatisfactory compromises in trying to please everybody but they have no choice. Alienating any of the above mentioned groups has a cost. The question then becomes, if you can’t satisfy everybody which customer group can you afford to “loose”?

Actually they don’t need to anything to please the cod community nor the reality players… they need to please the battlefield player, the regular conquest player, the hardcore gamer and rush masters. All the rest is not needed in my opinion!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/11 "2016-05-18T11:34:00Z")

</div>

> [@visegrip117](#):
>
> > [@Brentlostak](#):
> >
> > > [@snavelaer](#):
> > >
> > > > [@Brentlostak](#):
> > > >
> > > > it makes me sad, that this discussion is ongoing! those project “reality” gamers should stay away from the battlefield, and also the cod player for being traitors to the game they worshipped call of duty ! This game is called battlefield and thats it ! i think its sad to see how this is evolving into a fight under kiddies !
> > > 
> > > It’s pointed out by me rather black and white. There is also grey ofcourse. But are you more PR or CoD?
> > 
> > i’m a battlefield player. not project reality or cod player…
> 
> This also begs the question, which battlefield player are you? The earlier ones that started the franchise? The mid way guys? Or the new ones who just in the last two games became a “battlefield player” Bc the games and the playstyles differ greatly.
> 
> This isn’t necessarily aimed at just you. But more of a general question

You said it better than me \<3 And you?  
I want a game more like bf2 or 42, vietnam. The early days. And I wouldn’t mind slide it more towards PR. But I really liked the middle ones Bad Company and think the Bad Company series provided the best of both worlds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:35am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/12 "2016-05-18T11:35:00Z")

</div>

@Brentlostak . Same here with BC1. I guess I’d fall in the midway group. You’d have to agree though, the game has changed a fair amount from then to now. And with dice saying they’re “going back to the roots” I’m eager to see what this next game will be like. Don’t get me wrong ill buy it and enjoy it either way.

@Kinkykevin1927 . I wouldn’t say it’s deeply split at the moment, and I don’t think it ever will be. But at the moment we really don’t have any confirmed info about much. So it’s hard for people to be upset about anything. But I think as more and more footage and gameplay details are release people will have more things they dislike or like and complaints on both side will arise. But in the same token. More things will arise that people love as well

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:37am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/13 "2016-05-18T11:37:00Z")

</div>

> [@Brentlostak](#):
>
> > [@lexman61](#):
> >
> > The reality is that DICE & EA after several commercially successful games must now try to satisfy a very broad and varied audience besides the original PC players. Everything ranging from the young teenager, the COD crowd, BF veterans, hardcore aficionados, super casual players, etc. etc. must be taken into consideration.
> > 
> > This of corse increases the “risk” of unsatisfactory compromises in trying to please everybody but they have no choice. Alienating any of the above mentioned groups has a cost. The question then becomes, if you can’t satisfy everybody which customer group can you afford to “loose”?
> 
> Actually they don’t need to anything to please the cod community nor the reality players… they need to please the battlefield player, the regular conquest player, the hardcore gamer and rush masters. All the rest is not needed in my opinion!

Well yeah but the thing Early Days is a secondary market and the Last Day people is a Bigger money market

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/14 "2016-05-18T11:38:00Z")

</div>

> [@snavelaer](#):
>
> You said it better than me \<3 And you?  
> I want a game more like bf2 or 42, vietnam. The early days. And I wouldn’t mind slide it more towards PR. But I really liked the middle ones Bad Company and think the Bad Company series provided the best of both worlds.

I started in bc1. Though I talked a lot on the forums with guys from the previous games , about what was new in bc1 and how the previous games were. And now after playing all the games since then, I agree the BC series feels like it was the middle ground.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/brentlostak/32/101414_2.png) [@Brentlostak](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Brentlostak)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/15 "2016-05-18T11:38:00Z")

</div>

> [@visegrip117](#):
>
> @Brentlostak . Same here with BC1. I guess I’d fall in the midway group. You’d have to agree though, the game has changed a fair amount from then to now. And with dice saying they’re “going back to the roots” I’m eager to see what this next game will be like. Don’t get me wrong ill buy it and enjoy it either way.

True the game has changed a lot. But i don’t think they need to go any further then this. If you play it it should give you the feeling of the battlefield. and not some other game! I’m sooo looking forward to this game and how it plays!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:43am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/16 "2016-05-18T11:43:00Z")

</div>

> [@Brentlostak](#):
>
> True the game has changed a lot. But i don’t think they need to go any further then this. If you play it it should give you the feeling of the battlefield. and not some other game! I’m sooo looking forward to this game and how it plays!

I don’t think people so much as “dislike” the newer games but rather feel that some features were added that wasn’t needed. But they’re not game breakers and dice has a large audience to please. So I’m sure it isn’t an easy task to decide what makes it in the final game and what doesnt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/17 "2016-05-18T11:52:00Z")

</div>

So now I have some ideas how we can combine both ends of the spectrum. It is still a early idea. Iam not talking about a middle days game as Bad Company. It’s more radical but fun for everyone. Or at least I try.  
Fun while it gets the best out of the barrel for every Battlefielder!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 11:55am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/18 "2016-05-18T11:55:00Z")

</div>

> [@snavelaer](#):
>
> So now I have some ideas how we can combine both ends of the spectrum. It is still a early idea. Iam not talking about a middle days game as Bad Company. It’s more radical but fun for everyone. Or at least I try.  
> Fun while it gets the best out of the barrel for every Battlefielder!

Trying to please everyone is impossible. Anytime you do one thing for one group another group will dislike it. I think the goal is to try to do things that make the game fun and have a high replay factor while upsetting the least amount of groups as you can. And I believe that’s what dice is trying to do here. How well they do it remains to be seen.

Let’s hear your idea

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/snavelaer/32/103541_2.png) [@snavelaer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snavelaer)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 12:04pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/19 "2016-05-18T12:04:00Z")

</div>

> [@visegrip117](#):
>
> > [@snavelaer](#):
> >
> > So now I have some ideas how we can combine both ends of the spectrum. It is still a early idea. Iam not talking about a middle days game as Bad Company. It’s more radical but fun for everyone. Or at least I try.  
> > Fun while it gets the best out of the barrel for every Battlefielder!
> 
> Trying to please everyone is impossible. Anytime you do one thing for one group another group will dislike it. I think the goal is to try to do things that make the game fun and have a high replay factor while upsetting the least amount of groups as you can. And I believe that’s what dice is trying to do here. How well they do it remains to be seen.
> 
> Let’s hear your idea

True that’s why the Bad Company series is a good compromis.  
But there are more ways. I give you a small teaser. It has something to do with shellshock and rankingsystem…  
It will not be implemented in bf1 but maybe for let’s say Battlefield 1944…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PopoTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/popotoostronk/32/103149_2.png) [@PopoTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PopoTooStronk)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2016, 12:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396/20 "2016-05-18T12:09:00Z")

</div>

ì dont care cause i can adapt to whatever it becomes and if i dont like it i can always go back and play BF4 or another shooter like COD4 if they dont screw it up.

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/battlefield-vs-battlefield/101396.md?page=2)
