# BF1 will be casual or won't be **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [May 16, 2016, 7:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342 "2016-05-16T07:34:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 8
**Author:** ![swfc4eva1](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/swfc4eva1/32/103667_2.png) [@swfc4eva1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/swfc4eva1)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2016, 7:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/141 "2016-05-29T19:58:00Z")
> [@Arctic\_Breaker](#): > > > [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > > > [@heast1](#): > > > > > > > [@PopoTooStronk](#): > > > > > > > > high K/D players (slayers) should focus on harassing the enemy and keeping them busy so that the low K/D(flag runners) face little resistance when capturing objectives. > > > > > > this is very debatable to me. i know a high K/D player who focuses on his score only, and always makes loose his team. i guess such behavior represents one person less in the team to cap flag and hold strategic positions, thus more kills do not avoid tickets bleed > > > > 1 player cannot cause his team to lose! > > If said player is being passive with a power vehicle (say most of the MAA/MBT base-camping morons) then yes, that player can spell defeat for your team. I still don’t agree u got 31 other players that can determine the outcome of a game, no matter what one person can’t be blamed for a teams loss! ---
**Author:** ![PopoTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/popotoostronk/32/103149_2.png) [@PopoTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PopoTooStronk)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2016, 8:00pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/142 "2016-05-29T20:00:00Z")
> [@heast1](#): > > > [@PopoTooStronk](#): > > > > high K/D players (slayers) should focus on harassing the enemy and keeping them busy so that the low K/D(flag runners) face little resistance when capturing objectives. > > this is very debatable to me. i know a high K/D player who focuses on his score only, and always makes loose his team. i guess such behavior represents one person less in the team to cap flag and hold strategic positions, thus more kills do not avoid tickets bleed unless he finished last on the scoreboard i find it hard to believe that he alone is the cause on why the team lost, even then i doubt you can blame a loss on 1 guy. also if he is on the same flag as the low K/D players where do you think all the enemy is going to run to and who do you think is going to die first ? ---
**Author:** ![Arctic\_Breaker](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/arctic_breaker/32/101219_2.png) [@Arctic\_Breaker](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Arctic_Breaker)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2016, 8:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/143 "2016-05-29T20:26:00Z")
> [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > [@Arctic\_Breaker](#): > > > > > [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > > > > > [@heast1](#): > > > > > > > > > [@PopoTooStronk](#): > > > > > > > > > > high K/D players (slayers) should focus on harassing the enemy and keeping them busy so that the low K/D(flag runners) face little resistance when capturing objectives. > > > > > > > > this is very debatable to me. i know a high K/D player who focuses on his score only, and always makes loose his team. i guess such behavior represents one person less in the team to cap flag and hold strategic positions, thus more kills do not avoid tickets bleed > > > > > > 1 player cannot cause his team to lose! > > > > If said player is being passive with a power vehicle (say most of the MAA/MBT base-camping morons) then yes, that player can spell defeat for your team. > > I still don’t agree u got 31 other players that can determine the outcome of a game, no matter what one person can’t be blamed for a teams loss! But just the fact that said vehicle is effectively out of play, means you now have no counter to vehicles (Aircraft or IFV/MBT), and that can strongly determine the outcome of the battle. IMO, I rather you give the enemy our vehicles than passive sit with em. ---
**Author:** ![swfc4eva1](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/swfc4eva1/32/103667_2.png) [@swfc4eva1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/swfc4eva1)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2016, 8:29pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/144 "2016-05-29T20:29:00Z")
> [@Arctic\_Breaker](#): > > > [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > > > [@Arctic\_Breaker](#): > > > > > > > [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > > > > > > > [@heast1](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@PopoTooStronk](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > high K/D players (slayers) should focus on harassing the enemy and keeping them busy so that the low K/D(flag runners) face little resistance when capturing objectives. > > > > > > > > > > this is very debatable to me. i know a high K/D player who focuses on his score only, and always makes loose his team. i guess such behavior represents one person less in the team to cap flag and hold strategic positions, thus more kills do not avoid tickets bleed > > > > > > > > 1 player cannot cause his team to lose! > > > > > > If said player is being passive with a power vehicle (say most of the MAA/MBT base-camping morons) then yes, that player can spell defeat for your team. > > > > I still don’t agree u got 31 other players that can determine the outcome of a game, no matter what one person can’t be blamed for a teams loss! > > But just the fact that said vehicle is effectively out of play, means you now have no counter to vehicles (Aircraft or IFV/MBT), and that can strongly determine the outcome of the battle. IMO, I rather you give the enemy our vehicles than passive sit with em. I understand what ur getting at but imo I can’t blame just one player for a loss no matter what, obviously we have a difference in opinions which is cool each to their own n all that! ---
**Author:** ![HaveThisRocket](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/7bcc69/32.png) [@HaveThisRocket](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HaveThisRocket)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2016, 8:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/145 "2016-05-29T20:47:00Z")
-Plays a game where there are loads of noob no-skill gadgets like grenade launcher,ucav,range finders,lock ons,weapons with 1000 rof that kill in 4 bullets,doritos on each enemy’s head,no hitreg.Where every vehicle is made specifically for noobs to use and the maps are imbalanced and promote camping -Thinks that a game where like 10 weapons exist,half of them being bolt actions,tanks have no electronics,planes have no rockets or sensors or other BS,there are no helicopters or lock ons,will be more casual than the above Jesus You do realize right now Battlefield is probably the most casual fps on the market fps-skill-wise ---
**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2016, 8:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/146 "2016-05-29T20:55:00Z")
> [@HaveThisRocket](#): > > -Plays a game where there are loads of noob no-skill gadgets like grenade launcher,ucav,range finders,lock ons,weapons with 1000 rof that kill in 4 bullets,doritos on each enemy’s head,no hitreg.Where every vehicle is made specifically for noobs to use and the maps are imbalanced and promote camping > > -Thinks that a game where like 10 weapons exist,half of them being bolt actions,tanks have no electronics,planes have no rockets or sensors or other BS,there are no helicopters or lock ons,will be more casual than the above > > Jesus > > You do realize right now Battlefield is probably the most casual fps on the market fps-skill-wise everyone here thinks CoD is the only other shooter on the market and then proceed to claim that vehicles and large player counts somehow make a game less casual because that has always been the only prevailing difference between the two franchises despite BF fan’s irrational hatred for it. ---
**Author:** ![RODR1GU3Z\_619](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/aca169/32.png) [@RODR1GU3Z\_619](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RODR1GU3Z_619)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 2:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/147 "2016-05-30T02:38:00Z")
Either your good at shooters or you just suck . Casual won’t make a difference to us pro players . Scrubs deserve to get destroyed for their stupidity . ---
**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 2:56am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/148 "2016-05-30T02:56:00Z")
> [@RODR1GU3Z\_619](#): > > Either your good at shooters or you just suck . Casual won’t make a difference to us pro players . Scrubs deserve to get destroyed for their stupidity . you’re not pro. ---
**Author:** ![Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/keif68/32/100928_2.png) [@Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Keif68)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 3:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/149 "2016-05-30T03:31:00Z")
> [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > [@Arctic\_Breaker](#): > > > > > [@swfc4eva1](#): > > > > > > > [@heast1](#): > > > > > > > > > [@PopoTooStronk](#): > > > > > > > > > > high K/D players (slayers) should focus on harassing the enemy and keeping them busy so that the low K/D(flag runners) face little resistance when capturing objectives. > > > > > > > > this is very debatable to me. i know a high K/D player who focuses on his score only, and always makes loose his team. i guess such behavior represents one person less in the team to cap flag and hold strategic positions, thus more kills do not avoid tickets bleed > > > > > > 1 player cannot cause his team to lose! > > > > If said player is being passive with a power vehicle (say most of the MAA/MBT base-camping morons) then yes, that player can spell defeat for your team. > > I still don’t agree u got 31 other players that can determine the outcome of a game, no matter what one person can’t be blamed for a teams loss! Yep ---
**Author:** ![snakeheadinvade](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/bbce88/32.png) [@snakeheadinvade](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snakeheadinvade)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 5:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/150 "2016-05-30T05:46:00Z")
> [@heast1](#): > > that s my feeling after watching the trailer. it looks so cinematics oriented, so casual friendly. players will have super armor, super tank, zeplin, and destroyers, artillery, > like BF4 MAA at another scale i think it will not be as casual as you might think being how hard battlefront flopped. ---
**Author:** ![CrazyGI1998](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/crazygi1998/32/101576_2.png) [@CrazyGI1998](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CrazyGI1998)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 3:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342/151 "2016-05-30T15:18:00Z")
As a filthy casual, I hope it’s not a casual game. I hope it’s challenging, like one of those Red Orchestra games I hear so much about. [Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bf1-will-be-casual-or-wont-be/101342.md?page=7)