# BFV might be the best battlefield yet.

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bfv-might-be-the-best-battlefield-yet/105938>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [November 18, 2018, 3:30pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bfv-might-be-the-best-battlefield-yet/105938 "2018-11-18T15:30:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chubzdoomer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chubzdoomer/32/101517_2.png) [@Chubzdoomer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Chubzdoomer)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2018, 12:07am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bfv-might-be-the-best-battlefield-yet/105938/17 "2018-11-21T00:07:00Z")

</div>

> [@Rogue-Mike](#):
>
> BFV need to bring the Engineer class back online to take away the overwhelming utility Assault has currently. Tank buster role could of easily been one of its role.

Agreed.

I honestly think Battlefield 4 had a better scheme going:

- Assaults excelled versus infantry and healed teammates
- Engineers countered vehicles, and were somewhat less effective versus infantry than Assaults
- Supports provided ammo, laid down suppressive fire, and used mortars, etc. to, well, support attacks
- Recons err… camped and sniped, just as they’ve always done

---

_[View the full topic](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/bfv-might-be-the-best-battlefield-yet/105938)._