# Canada needs to be a playable nation. **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 14, 2016, 12:30am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986 "2016-06-14T00:30:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:30am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/1 "2016-06-14T00:30:00Z")
Simply Put Canada was the most important nation after Britain and France. I would probably go as far to say they were more important than France. Canada won battles and held lines when all other nations could not, and Germans called Canadians “Storm Troppers” because they were one of the most feared among all the allies in ww1. I’m not saying other countries didn’t do anything but Canada did far more than any other nation under Britain during the War. So in my opinion i think it’s a must that Canada be added as a playable nation. ---
**Author:** ![DrVanNostrand1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/ecccb3/32.png) [@DrVanNostrand1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DrVanNostrand1)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/2 "2016-06-14T00:34:00Z")
are you serious? ---
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/3 "2016-06-14T00:34:00Z")
> [@DrVanNostrand1](#): > > are you serious? 100% read up on your history. ---
**Author:** ![poisonstrudel](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ecc23a/32.png) [@poisonstrudel](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/poisonstrudel)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:35am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/4 "2016-06-14T00:35:00Z")
I agree, but they’ll probably be mixed into the British faction along with the black Australians ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/f/4/f4dfd531bc0f0686f50bd4ce2b7fc07a8d9be5ec.png) ---
**Author:** ![thatcrazyguy1234](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thatcrazyguy1234/32/101585_2.png) [@thatcrazyguy1234](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/thatcrazyguy1234)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:39am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/5 "2016-06-14T00:39:00Z")
America had to finish what ya’ll started. End thread. But seriously France needs to be in the game. It’s crazy they aren’t. France’s killed in the war: 1,357,800 Canada’s killed: 61,000 ---
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:43am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/6 "2016-06-14T00:43:00Z")
> [@thatcrazyguy1234](#): > > America had to finish what ya’ll started. > End thread. > But seriously France needs to be in the game. It’s crazy they aren’t. > France’s killed in the war: 1,357,800 > Canada’s killed: 61,000 Canada had a population of just about 8 million before the start of ww1. We had over 630,000 soldiers serve. That’s a pretty sizable chunk of a population going to server another countries war for a country of only 8 million. ---
**Author:** ![thatcrazyguy1234](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thatcrazyguy1234/32/101585_2.png) [@thatcrazyguy1234](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/thatcrazyguy1234)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 12:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/7 "2016-06-14T00:46:00Z")
> [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > [@thatcrazyguy1234](#): > > > > America had to finish what ya’ll started. > > End thread. > > But seriously France needs to be in the game. It’s crazy they aren’t. > > France’s killed in the war: 1,357,800 > > Canada’s killed: 61,000 > > Canada had a population of just about 8 million before the start of ww1. > We had over 630,000 soldiers serve. That’s a pretty sizable chunk of a population going to server another countries war for a country of only 8 million. I’m not saying Canada didn’t play a big role in WWI. I’m saying that DICE should focus on getting France in the game before any other nation. ---
**Author:** ![oof14346](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/oof14346/32/103024_2.png) [@oof14346](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/oof14346)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/8 "2016-06-14T01:12:00Z")
The Battle of Vimy Ridge. ---
**Author:** ![ChickNFoot](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chicknfoot/32/101502_2.png) [@ChickNFoot](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ChickNFoot)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:25am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/9 "2016-06-14T01:25:00Z")
Do we really need every nation that has every participated in WW1 regardless of contribution? Next people will want Russian Austrian Arabic Turkish Italian (maybe already implimited) Hungarian Australian And probably the other 100 countires that participated. I don’t care who I play as. Just because a country wasn’t added in doesn’t mean it should be a must. ---
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:32am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/10 "2016-06-14T01:32:00Z")
> [@ChickNFoot](#): > > Do we really need every nation that has every participated in WW1 regardless of contribution? > > Next people will want > Russian > Austrian > Arabic > Turkish > Italian (maybe already implimited) > Hungarian > Australian > And probably the other 100 countires that participated. > > I don’t care who I play as. Just because a country wasn’t added in doesn’t mean it should be a must. no but canada is more important than Australia, Italy, India, Even America. It was probably the 2nd most important country aside from Britain in ww1. Factions should be. Britain, Canada, Germany , Austria and Hungary. For the Western Front. ---
**Author:** ![AnzacPete](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/96bed5/32.png) [@AnzacPete](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AnzacPete)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/11 "2016-06-14T01:38:00Z")
> [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > [@ChickNFoot](#): > > > > Do we really need every nation that has every participated in WW1 regardless of contribution? > > > > Next people will want > > Russian > > Austrian > > Arabic > > Turkish > > Italian (maybe already implimited) > > Hungarian > > Australian > > And probably the other 100 countires that participated. > > > > I don’t care who I play as. Just because a country wasn’t added in doesn’t mean it should be a must. > > no but canada is more important than Australia, Italy, India, Even America. It was probably the 2nd most important country aside from Britain in ww1. Factions should be. Britain, Canada, Germany , Austria and Hungary. For the Western Front. Haha more important that Germany? I don’t think so. Germany, Britain & France in no particular order, then an equal smattering of others on both sides of the battle. ---
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:42am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/12 "2016-06-14T01:42:00Z")
[/quote]Haha more important that Germany? I don’t think so. Germany, Britain & France in no particular order, then an equal smattering of others on both sides of the battle.[/quote] did you even read what i typed? No you did not. Canada Was the 2nd (at the very least 3rd) most important nation on the ALLIES, side when in came to ww1. I take it English isn’t your first language kid. ---
**Author:** ![RedGuyCoolLight](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ee59a6/32.png) [@RedGuyCoolLight](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RedGuyCoolLight)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/13 "2016-06-14T01:45:00Z")
Vimy ridge all the way as a map. Image the tunnels and artillery on rails ---
**Author:** ![AnzacPete](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/96bed5/32.png) [@AnzacPete](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AnzacPete)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:48am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/14 "2016-06-14T01:48:00Z")
> [@GeneralKyle7](#): > Haha more important that Germany? I don’t think so. Germany, Britain & France in no particular order, then an equal smattering of others on both sides of the battle.[/quote] did you even read what i typed? No you did not. Canada Was the 2nd (at the very least 3rd) most important nation on the ALLIES, side when in came to ww1. I take it English isn’t your first language kid. [/quote] Reread YOUR original post “Simply Put Canada was the most important nation after Britain and France” NOTHING about Allies being the limits. Yes I did read all of your posts and all sides had their feared soldier’s not just Canada. ---
**Author:** ![ChickNFoot](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chicknfoot/32/101502_2.png) [@ChickNFoot](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ChickNFoot)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:55am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/15 "2016-06-14T01:55:00Z")
> [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > [@ChickNFoot](#): > > > > Do we really need every nation that has every participated in WW1 regardless of contribution? > > > > Next people will want > > Russian > > Austrian > > Arabic > > Turkish > > Italian (maybe already implimited) > > Hungarian > > Australian > > And probably the other 100 countires that participated. > > > > I don’t care who I play as. Just because a country wasn’t added in doesn’t mean it should be a must. > > no but canada is more important than Australia, Italy, India, Even America. It was probably the 2nd most important country aside from Britain in ww1. Factions should be. Britain, Canada, Germany , Austria and Hungary. For the Western Front. Okay so? Just because your country wasn’t added doesn’t mean it’s bad. Then what good would this do. Canada would be UK styled soilders with a Maple Leaf patch. It wasn’t like the Canadian Army wasn’t so different (visually) to the Uk Army. Just with a different accent maybe with a few patches. The same goes for Austrailia (same thing with small differences). ---
**Author:** ![ChickNFoot](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chicknfoot/32/101502_2.png) [@ChickNFoot](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ChickNFoot)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 1:57am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/16 "2016-06-14T01:57:00Z")
> [@ChickNFoot](#): > > > [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > > > [@ChickNFoot](#): > > > > > > Do we really need every nation that has every participated in WW1 regardless of contribution? > > > > > > Next people will want > > > Russian > > > Austrian > > > Arabic > > > Turkish > > > Italian (maybe already implimited) > > > Hungarian > > > Australian > > > And probably the other 100 countires that participated. > > > > > > I don’t care who I play as. Just because a country wasn’t added in doesn’t mean it should be a must. > > > > no but canada is more important than Australia, Italy, India, Even America. It was probably the 2nd most important country aside from Britain in ww1. Factions should be. Britain, Canada, Germany , Austria and Hungary. For the Western Front. > > Okay so? Just because your country wasn’t added doesn’t mean it’s bad. > > Then what good would this do. Canada would be UK styled soilders with a Maple Leaf patch. > It wasn’t like the Canadian Army wasn’t so different (visually) to the Uk Army. Just with a different accent maybe with a few patches. > All because Canada wasn’t officially it own country because it was apart of the British Empire. > > The same goes for Austrailia (same thing with small differences). ---
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 2:06am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/17 "2016-06-14T02:06:00Z")
> [@AnzacPete](#): > > > [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > > Haha more important that Germany? I don’t think so. Germany, Britain & France in no particular order, then an equal smattering of others on both sides of the battle. did you even read what i typed? No you did not. Canada Was the 2nd (at the very least 3rd) most important nation on the ALLIES, side when in came to ww1. I take it English isn’t your first language kid. [/quote] Reread YOUR original post “Simply Put Canada was the most important nation after Britain and France” NOTHING about Allies being the limits. Yes I did read all of your posts and all sides had their feared soldier’s not just Canada.[/quote] you know what i ment kid use common sense ffs. ---
**Author:** ![GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalkyle7/32/102052_2.png) [@GeneralKyle7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GeneralKyle7)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 2:09am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/18 "2016-06-14T02:09:00Z")
Also British and Canadian Uniforms were way different in ww1, you are wrong again… ---
**Author:** ![AnzacPete](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/96bed5/32.png) [@AnzacPete](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AnzacPete)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 2:10am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/19 "2016-06-14T02:10:00Z")
> [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > [@AnzacPete](#): > > > > > [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > > > > > > Haha more important that Germany? I don’t think so. Germany, Britain & France in no particular order, then an equal smattering of others on both sides of the battle. > > did you even read what i typed? No you did not. Canada Was the 2nd (at the very least 3rd) most important nation on the ALLIES, side when in came to ww1. I take it English isn’t your first language kid. Reread YOUR original post “Simply Put Canada was the most important nation after Britain and France” NOTHING about Allies being the limits. Yes I did read all of your posts and all sides had their feared soldier’s not just Canada.[/quote] you know i ment kid use common sense ffs.[/quote] No I didn’t, My mistake was reading your carefully crafted ambiguous bit of sentence. - Not a biggie. Your mistake was to get abusive to somebody that’s most likely your senior and if not then you are just an old grumpy b$%^#rd. 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![CAPT\_Gangplank](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/eb9ed0/32.png) [@CAPT\_Gangplank](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CAPT_Gangplank)\ **Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 2:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/20 "2016-06-14T02:12:00Z")
> [@GeneralKyle7](#): > > Also British and Canadian Uniforms were way different in ww1, you are wrong again… No they were not. After 1915, they wore the standard British pattern. The only difference was badges and patches. They did originally ship out in a Canadian pattern however. Just like the Ross rifles were replaced with British guns. [Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986.md?page=2)