# Canada needs to be a playable nation.

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 14, 2016, 12:30am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986 "2016-06-14T00:30:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/278dde/32.png) [@Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Vespervin1)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2016, 2:14am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986/21 "2016-06-14T02:14:00Z")

</div>

> [@GeneralKyle7](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Haha more important that Germany? I don’t think so. Germany, Britain & France in no particular order, then an equal smattering of others on both sides of the battle.
> 
> did you even read what i typed? No you did not. Canada Was the 2nd (at the very least 3rd) most important nation on the ALLIES, side when in came to ww1. I take it English isn’t your first language kid.

Settle down, the post he quoted you didn’t say _‘most important nation on the allies’_, you said _‘It was probably the 2nd most important country aside from Britain in ww1’_. You stated it was the second most important for the Allies in your OP.

My thoughts: France and Russia need to be added before anyone else. Canada will most likely be mixed with the British Empire, like how Australia and India are in-game.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/canada-needs-to-be-a-playable-nation/101986.md?page=1)