# DICE please dont replace the Conquest / BT Pacific rotations

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [November 7, 2019, 9:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394 "2019-11-07T21:34:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 9:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/1 "2019-11-07T21:34:00Z")

</div>

Due to the popular demand for these Pacific rotations can you please allow them to remain.

Instead of replacing them next Thursday can you just add the Squad 5 v 5 Conquest for those who want that mode and still keep  
the Conquest and BT rotations we have a the moment.

Please add weight to this request and help keep the Pacific rotations, thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![llPhantom\_Limbll](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/llphantom_limbll/32/102656_2.png) [@llPhantom\_Limbll](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/llPhantom_Limbll)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 9:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/2 "2019-11-07T21:53:00Z")

</div>

Removing Pacific only rotations during “War in the Pacific” makes 0 sense to me. What’s the whole point of that? I have no intent to go back and play boring crap like Narvik just to get a tiny chance of Iwo Jima appearing on the list.  
And because nobody knows when RSP will be added, such rotation must stay in game. I remember DLC only servers during BF1 days. Why can’t we have such thing here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 9:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/3 "2019-11-07T21:58:00Z")

</div>

> [@llPhantom\_Limbll](#):
>
> Removing Pacific only rotations during “War in the Pacific” makes 0 sense to me. What’s the whole point of that? I have no intent to go back and play borign crap like Narvik just to gat a tiny chance of Iwo jima appearing ont he list.  
> And because nobody knows when RSP will be added, such rotation must stay in game. I remember DLC onyl servers durign BF1 days. Why can’t we have such thing here?

Why indeed, it makes no sense whatsoever. Just when BFV looked promising they plan to take away the most popular rotation and replace it with 5 v 5.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CinkCobra](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/cinkcobra/32/101522_2.png) [@CinkCobra](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CinkCobra)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 10:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/4 "2019-11-07T22:02:00Z")

</div>

It hurts my brain that they think it’s a good idea to remove these playlists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 10:04pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/5 "2019-11-07T22:04:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> > [@CinkCobra](#):
> >
> > It hurts my brain that they think it’s a good idea to remove these playlists.

Me too its a no brainer, let players play what they want.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LinkZeppeloyd](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/linkzeppeloyd/32/104893_2.png) [@LinkZeppeloyd](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/LinkZeppeloyd)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 10:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/6 "2019-11-07T22:05:00Z")

</div>

Welp, my friend and I who gave up on BFV a few months ago came back for the Pac. And we like the new maps, having fun!

Its unreal to me that DICE is getting rid of them. Its simply not worth the time trying to server hop for 2 maps.

It was fun while it lasted, i guess we might play again if Pacific conquest rotation comes back.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 10:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/7 "2019-11-07T22:07:00Z")

</div>

> [@LinkZeppeloyd](#):
>
> Welp, my friend and I who gave up on BFV a few months ago came back for the Pac. And we like the new maps, having fun!
> 
> Its unreal to me that DICE is getting rid of them. Its simply not worth the time trying to server hop for 2 maps.
> 
> It was fun while it lasted, i guess we might play again if Pacific conquest rotation comes back.

I think a lot of players will feel the same and BFV will suffer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/genesismd5745/32/102054_2.png) [@GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GenesisMD5745)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 11:32pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/8 "2019-11-07T23:32:00Z")

</div>

Sounds like I’ll be doing a lot of server hopping. DICE is seriously going to remove one of the most successful rotations for some silly 5 v 5 mode that nobody will care about? Typical DICE logic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/noodlesocks/32/101045_2.png) [@Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Noodlesocks)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 11:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/9 "2019-11-07T23:41:00Z")

</div>

> [@CinkCobra](#):
>
> It hurts my brain that they think it’s a good idea to remove these playlists.

Removing things that people enjoy has been this game’s MO unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wasp9166](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/b4bc9f/32.png) [@wasp9166](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/wasp9166)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2019, 11:45pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/10 "2019-11-07T23:45:00Z")

</div>

wait a sec, i only started playing because of the pacific maps , so, after this few weeks where are they going?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MBT\_Layzan](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mbt_layzan/32/102770_2.png) [@MBT\_Layzan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MBT_Layzan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 12:22am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/11 "2019-11-08T00:22:00Z")

</div>

So are we losing these server rotations? If so that sucks…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:11am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/12 "2019-11-08T06:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@wasp9166](#):
>
> wait a sec, i only started playing because of the pacific maps , so, after this few weeks where are they going?

The Conquest / BT Pacific maps will only be available as part of the normal rotation, so you have to queue to play them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:13am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/13 "2019-11-08T06:13:00Z")

</div>

> [@MBT\_Layzan](#):
>
> So are we losing these server rotations? If so that sucks…

Yep sadly next Thursday they are removing them and replacing with Squad Contest 5 v5 rotation. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MBT\_Layzan](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mbt_layzan/32/102770_2.png) [@MBT\_Layzan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MBT_Layzan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/14 "2019-11-08T06:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@RayD\_O1](#):
>
> > [@MBT\_Layzan](#):
> >
> > So are we losing these server rotations? If so that sucks…
> 
> Yep sadly next Thursday they are removing them and replacing with Squad Contest 5 v5 rotation. ☹

Arh I see, that’s a shame.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:00am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/15 "2019-11-08T07:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@GenesisMD5745](#):
>
> Sounds like I’ll be doing a lot of server hopping. DICE is seriously going to remove one of the most successful rotations for some silly 5 v 5 mode that nobody will care about? Typical DICE logic.

Server hopping and queueing, frustrating. !!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ProAssassin2003](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/proassassin2003/32/103170_2.png) [@ProAssassin2003](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ProAssassin2003)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:32am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/16 "2019-11-08T07:32:00Z")

</div>

I haven’t played Underground since they got rid of the Dedicated playlist and now they’re doing the same for The Pacific.

DICE you was back on track and now you’re back to stupid decision making. People are having a blast with 100+ Breakthrough servers for Pacific alone on PS4 and you’re going to remove them.

Wake the F\*\*K up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:44am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/17 "2019-11-08T07:44:00Z")

</div>

Aww animal-dung, here we go again…  
.  
Why would you want us to have more reasons to play your game less DICE?!?!  
.  
I could not care less about your 5v5 bulldung. This is Battleifield.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/18 "2019-11-08T08:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@MBT\_Layzan](#):
>
> > [@RayD\_O1](#):
> >
> > > [@MBT\_Layzan](#):
> > >
> > > So are we losing these server rotations? If so that sucks…
> > 
> > Yep sadly next Thursday they are removing them and replacing with Squad Contest 5 v5 rotation. ☹
> 
> Arh I see, that’s a shame.

It is a shame and totally unnecessary in my opinion. Why not keep the current rotations which are extremely popular and

add the 5 v 5 Squad Contest rotation for those who want that mode. ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/19 "2019-11-08T08:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@Hawxxeye](#):
>
> Aww animal-dung, here we go again…  
> .  
> Why would you want us to have more reasons to play your game less DICE?!?!  
> .  
> I could not care less about your 5v5 bulldung. This is Battleifield.

You and me both. Why not just add a 5 v 5 playlist alongside the current Pacific playlists and job done. !!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/20 "2019-11-08T08:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@ProAssassin2003](#):
>
> I haven’t played Underground since they got rid of the Dedicated playlist and now they’re doing the same for The Pacific.
> 
> DICE you was back on track and now you’re back to stupid decision making. People are having a blast with 100+ Breakthrough servers for Pacific alone on PS4 and you’re going to remove them.
> 
> Wake the F\*\*K up.

Agreed there has been a much better vibe since the Pacific release now this decision will sour that.

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394.md?page=2)
