# DICE please dont replace the Conquest / BT Pacific rotations

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [November 7, 2019, 9:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394 "2019-11-07T21:34:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StingX71](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/stingx71/32/103620_2.png) [@StingX71](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/StingX71)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 1:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/41 "2019-11-08T13:43:00Z")

</div>

I’ll double down and say I’d like to see servers with Pacific Maps alternating BT/CQ. Typically don’t like BT, but find it fun with the new maps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 3:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/42 "2019-11-08T15:07:00Z")

</div>

> [@VincentNZ](#):
>
> DICE definitely needs to create more rotations, we have 15 maps now that are in standard conquest, which means the ones I actually want to play are getting scarce. I am constantly forced to play Aerodrome, Narvik and Panzerstorm, and rarely maps that to do not make my blood boil when loading.

Yeah everyone has maps they hate. That is why it is so nice to have the Pacific rotation no problem queuing or grinding out maps you don’t want to play.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/genesismd5745/32/102054_2.png) [@GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GenesisMD5745)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 3:32pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/43 "2019-11-08T15:32:00Z")

</div>

> [@RayD\_O1](#):
>
> > [@GenesisMD5745](#):
> >
> > Sounds like I’ll be doing a lot of server hopping. DICE is seriously going to remove one of the most successful rotations for some silly 5 v 5 mode that nobody will care about? Typical DICE logic.
> 
> Server hopping and queueing, frustrating. !!!

I expect to see lots of servers with 8-10+ queues with players trying to play one of the maps before the Pacific maps. Depending on what map you join, by the time you finally join, the match for the map you want to play on will be over or almost over.

Thanks, DICE for giving us what we truly want. 5 v 5 Squad Conquest! Get rid of those nasty Conquest rotations with big maps and lots of vehicles and 64 players. They don’t represent what Battlefield is anymore.

Seriously though, it’s going to be hard going back to the old maps. There’s only a few that I can still enjoy unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 5:39pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/44 "2019-11-08T17:39:00Z")

</div>

> [@GenesisMD5745](#):
>
> > [@RayD\_O1](#):
> >
> > > [@GenesisMD5745](#):
> > >
> > > Sounds like I’ll be doing a lot of server hopping. DICE is seriously going to remove one of the most successful rotations for some silly 5 v 5 mode that nobody will care about? Typical DICE logic.
> > 
> > Server hopping and queueing, frustrating. !!!
> 
> I expect to see lots of servers with 8-10+ queues with players trying to play one of the maps before the Pacific maps. Depending on what map you join, by the time you finally join, the match for the map you want to play on will be over or almost over.
> 
> Thanks, DICE for giving us what we truly want. 5 v 5 Squad Conquest! Get rid of those nasty Conquest rotations with big maps and lots of vehicles and 64 players. They don’t represent what Battlefield is anymore.
> 
> Seriously though, it’s going to be hard going back to the old maps. There’s only a few that I can still enjoy unfortunately.

Yeah I agree, at the moment its fun, plenty of well populated Pacific servers.

From next Thursday the drudge of trying to play these popular maps begins.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![llPhantom\_Limbll](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/llphantom_limbll/32/102656_2.png) [@llPhantom\_Limbll](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/llPhantom_Limbll)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/45 "2019-11-08T18:02:00Z")

</div>

It’s not a perfect solution but it’s something at least.

[https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/1192835732035055616](https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/1192835732035055616)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeastofBourbon84](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/8c91f0/32.png) [@BeastofBourbon84](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BeastofBourbon84)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:33pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/46 "2019-11-08T18:33:00Z")

</div>

Maybe I’m old but since when is friggin Twitter the #1 source for game news?

Thx for the update man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![llPhantom\_Limbll](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/llphantom_limbll/32/102656_2.png) [@llPhantom\_Limbll](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/llPhantom_Limbll)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:36pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/47 "2019-11-08T18:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@BeastofBourbon84](#):
>
> Maybe I’m old but since when is friggin Twitter the #1 source for game news?
> 
> Thx for the update man.
> 
> Dice is lazy or simply has no will to post anything here. So we have to rely on other sources.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 6:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/48 "2019-11-08T18:44:00Z")

</div>

> [@llPhantom\_Limbll](#):
>
> It’s not a perfect solution but it’s something at least.
> 
> [https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/1192835732035055616](https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/1192835732035055616)

Agreed not perfect but much better than queueing the normal rotation, it appears they listened to us so thanks DICE.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeastofBourbon84](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/8c91f0/32.png) [@BeastofBourbon84](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BeastofBourbon84)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/49 "2019-11-08T19:11:00Z")

</div>

Just the tip daddy dice…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@MrCamp121](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MrCamp121)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/50 "2019-11-08T20:01:00Z")

</div>

Lol queue of 8 on arras right now. Yep pacific is great…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/genesismd5745/32/102054_2.png) [@GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GenesisMD5745)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/51 "2019-11-08T20:18:00Z")

</div>

> [@llPhantom\_Limbll](#):
>
> It’s not a perfect solution but it’s something at least.
> 
> [https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/1192835732035055616](https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/1192835732035055616)

I’ll gladly accept that.

Besides, I’ve kind of grown to enjoy the Breakthrough mode on these maps. Seems DICE has listened to us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeastofBourbon84](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/8c91f0/32.png) [@BeastofBourbon84](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BeastofBourbon84)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:37pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/52 "2019-11-08T20:37:00Z")

</div>

Breakthrough \> Conquest that’s all

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/53 "2019-11-08T20:50:00Z")

</div>

So the new Pacific War rotation runs from next Thursday through until December.

We get the Wake Island map in December so they can run all 3 maps in their own rotation from then until…………

Maybe permanently. ? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kattegat\_Twin](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kattegat_twin/32/102472_2.png) [@Kattegat\_Twin](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Kattegat_Twin)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:59pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/54 "2019-11-08T20:59:00Z")

</div>

@RayD_O1 Oh man, I hope so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 9:08pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/55 "2019-11-08T21:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@Kattegat\_Twin](#):
>
> @RayD_O1 Oh man, I hope so.

Me too, if it remains popular you just never know. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 6:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/56 "2019-11-09T06:45:00Z")

</div>

[https://new.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/dtgn0a/playlists\_in\_the\_pacific\_what\_will\_change\_next/](https://new.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/dtgn0a/playlists_in_the_pacific_what_will_change_next/)

This gives a bit more detail about their plans for playlists going forward etc and is worth a read.

I particularly liked the line -  
When 5.2 launches, we’ll talk about how the playlists change, but to be absolutely clear, we can see how much you’re loving playing on the Pacific and we’ll do what we can to keep you where you want to be!

Sounds promising.

I think DICE has listened to the message we sent as players. 🙂

On a different note, I feel these sort of updates should be posted here on the official; forums. There is a lot of interaction going  
on that we never see unless we follow Reddit, Twitter etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GrizzGolf](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/grizzgolf/32/102129_2.png) [@GrizzGolf](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GrizzGolf)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 10:02am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/57 "2019-11-09T10:02:00Z")

</div>

Just add underground more

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 10:11am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/58 "2019-11-09T10:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@GrizzGolf](#):
>
> Just add underground more

It wouldn’t surprise me if they gave Underground a Conquest / BT rotation just like they did when it first came out, it is also very popular.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/genesismd5745/32/102054_2.png) [@GenesisMD5745](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GenesisMD5745)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 3:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/59 "2019-11-09T15:21:00Z")

</div>

> [@RayD\_O1](#):
>
> [https://new.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/dtgn0a/playlists\_in\_the\_pacific\_what\_will\_change\_next/](https://new.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/dtgn0a/playlists_in_the_pacific_what_will_change_next/)
> 
> This gives a bit more detail about their plans for playlists going forward etc and is worth a read.
> 
> I particularly liked the line -  
> When 5.2 launches, we’ll talk about how the playlists change, but to be absolutely clear, we can see how much you’re loving playing on the Pacific and we’ll do what we can to keep you where you want to be!
> 
> Sounds promising.
> 
> I think DICE has listened to the message we sent as players. 🙂
> 
> On a different note, I feel these sort of updates should be posted here on the official; forums. There is a lot of interaction going  
> on that we never see unless we follow Reddit, Twitter etc.

Thanks for sharing the info. Agreed that they should be posting this on the official forums here. Maybe they don’t since sites like Reddit and Twitter get a lot more attention. The forums here are pretty much forgotten about unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8edcca/32.png) [@RayD\_O1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RayD_O1)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 3:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394/60 "2019-11-09T15:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@GenesisMD5745](#):
>
> > [@RayD\_O1](#):
> >
> > [https://new.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/dtgn0a/playlists\_in\_the\_pacific\_what\_will\_change\_next/](https://new.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/dtgn0a/playlists_in_the_pacific_what_will_change_next/)
> > 
> > This gives a bit more detail about their plans for playlists going forward etc and is worth a read.
> > 
> > I particularly liked the line -  
> > When 5.2 launches, we’ll talk about how the playlists change, but to be absolutely clear, we can see how much you’re loving playing on the Pacific and we’ll do what we can to keep you where you want to be!
> > 
> > Sounds promising.
> > 
> > I think DICE has listened to the message we sent as players. 🙂
> > 
> > On a different note, I feel these sort of updates should be posted here on the official; forums. There is a lot of interaction going  
> > on that we never see unless we follow Reddit, Twitter etc.
> 
> Thanks for sharing the info. Agreed that they should be posting this on the official forums here. Maybe they don’t since sites like Reddit and Twitter get a lot more attention. The forums here are pretty much forgotten about unfortunately.

Yes they do get more attention. I just feel information like the above should be posted on here at the same time, especially as there was a thread  
asking for the playlist to be kept.

It just always feels a bit like second hand news by the time it appears on here and it’s usually been linked from other sites.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/dice-please-dont-replace-the-conquest-bt-pacific-rotations/107394.md?page=2)
