# Difference between M95 and Type 99? **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [October 30, 2019, 1:00am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373 "2019-10-30T01:00:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![hkspm123](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/3bc359/32.png) [@hkspm123](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/hkspm123)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:10am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/41 "2019-11-08T08:10:00Z")
Smell a lot of ¯\_(ツ)\_/¯ , symthic doesn’t lie . ---
**Author:** ![jroggs](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jroggs/32/106829_2.png) [@jroggs](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/jroggs)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/42 "2019-11-08T08:12:00Z")
> [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > > > (Quote) > > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > > Same goes for ROF > > > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. > > Also, I can swear that I heard somewhere that the, Type 99 has a bullet velocity of 670. I cant remember who said it, but I know I heard it. If that is the case, that would explain the less bullet drop/ better range. So your whole argument is “never mind the people who actually datamine and research this stuff, I’m right because I say so and maybe I think I also heard it somewhere.” ---
**Author:** ![dandop\_oq7r7ppf](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/a9a28c/32.png) [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/dandop_oq7r7ppf)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 1:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/43 "2019-11-08T13:20:00Z")
> [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > (Quote) > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > Same goes for ROF > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. I think the developers overlooked it. I won’t be surprised if the type 99 gets a small buff. There is no difference in Bullet drop. Both are identical. Check out sym it’s the new Symthik site They lay out extensive stats of each weapon, and you can compare them [https://sym.gg/](https://sym.gg/) ---
**Author:** ![The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/the_berg_366/32/101051_2.png) [@The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/The_BERG_366)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 2:00pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/44 "2019-11-08T14:00:00Z")
> [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > > > (Quote) > > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > > Same goes for ROF > > > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. > > I think the developers overlooked it. > I won’t be surprised if the type 99 gets a small buff. > > There is no difference in Bullet drop. Both are identical. > Check out sym it’s the new Symthik site > They lay out extensive stats of each weapon, and you can compare them > > [https://sym.gg/](https://sym.gg/) I would normally support such a statement but when I tried the type 99 it felt like it had significantly faster bullet velocity than the Gewehr 95. normally I find the explanation of why something feels the way it does in the stats but not here. so either Im just being deceived by something or the stats aren’t the ones applicable to the version of the game I play. ---
**Author:** ![dandop\_oq7r7ppf](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/a9a28c/32.png) [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/dandop_oq7r7ppf)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 2:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/45 "2019-11-08T14:12:00Z")
> [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > > > > > (Quote) > > > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > > > Same goes for ROF > > > > > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > > > > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > > > > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > > > > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. > > > > I think the developers overlooked it. > > I won’t be surprised if the type 99 gets a small buff. > > > > There is no difference in Bullet drop. Both are identical. > > Check out sym it’s the new Symthik site > > They lay out extensive stats of each weapon, and you can compare them > > > > [https://sym.gg/](https://sym.gg/) > > I would normally support such a statement but when I tried the type 99 it felt like it had significantly faster bullet velocity than the Gewehr 95. normally I find the explanation of why something feels the way it does in the stats but not here. so either Im just being deceived by something or the stats aren’t the ones applicable to the version of the game I play. It doesn’t. Velocity and bullet drop are identical. Could be the sound of the rifle that is giving you the perception of a faster bullet or less drop ---
**Author:** ![The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/the_berg_366/32/101051_2.png) [@The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/The_BERG_366)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 2:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/46 "2019-11-08T14:19:00Z")
> [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > > > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > (Quote) > > > > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > > > > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > > > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > > > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > > > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > > > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > > > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > > > > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > > > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > > > > Same goes for ROF > > > > > > > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > > > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > > > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > > > > > > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > > > > > > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > > > > > > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. > > > > > > I think the developers overlooked it. > > > I won’t be surprised if the type 99 gets a small buff. > > > > > > There is no difference in Bullet drop. Both are identical. > > > Check out sym it’s the new Symthik site > > > They lay out extensive stats of each weapon, and you can compare them > > > > > > [https://sym.gg/](https://sym.gg/) > > > > I would normally support such a statement but when I tried the type 99 it felt like it had significantly faster bullet velocity than the Gewehr 95. normally I find the explanation of why something feels the way it does in the stats but not here. so either Im just being deceived by something or the stats aren’t the ones applicable to the version of the game I play. > > It doesn’t. > Velocity and bullet drop are identical. > Could be the sound of the rifle that is giving you the perception of a faster bullet or less drop no… I normally use the m95 and found that I have to remind myself to lead less when using the type 99. also I can read the stats myself, thank you, I know what they say. ---
**Author:** ![dandop\_oq7r7ppf](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/a9a28c/32.png) [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/dandop_oq7r7ppf)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 2:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/47 "2019-11-08T14:42:00Z")
> [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > > > [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Quote) > > > > > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > > > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > > > > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > > > > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > > > > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > > > > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > > > > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > > > > > > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > > > > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > > > > > Same goes for ROF > > > > > > > > > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > > > > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > > > > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > > > > > > > > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > > > > > > > > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. > > > > > > > > I think the developers overlooked it. > > > > I won’t be surprised if the type 99 gets a small buff. > > > > > > > > There is no difference in Bullet drop. Both are identical. > > > > Check out sym it’s the new Symthik site > > > > They lay out extensive stats of each weapon, and you can compare them > > > > > > > > [https://sym.gg/](https://sym.gg/) > > > > > > I would normally support such a statement but when I tried the type 99 it felt like it had significantly faster bullet velocity than the Gewehr 95. normally I find the explanation of why something feels the way it does in the stats but not here. so either Im just being deceived by something or the stats aren’t the ones applicable to the version of the game I play. > > > > It doesn’t. > > Velocity and bullet drop are identical. > > Could be the sound of the rifle that is giving you the perception of a faster bullet or less drop > > no… > I normally use the m95 and found that I have to remind myself to lead less when using the type 99. > also I can read the stats myself, thank you, I know what they say. Well you are wrong. If you wanna base weapon stats off of “feelings” and “gut instincts” I can also do that. I’ve put in close to 1000 hours into this game, and extensively play recon. I can see virtually no difference between the two, when it comes to leading shots. I bet the sound and different scopes are playing tricks on you, and you perceive it to be different. ---
**Author:** ![Terminator000001](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@Terminator000001](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Terminator000001)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 2:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/48 "2019-11-08T14:50:00Z")
> [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > Which begs the question, why use anything else? Because playing meta is for casuals. ---
**Author:** ![Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Tip_the_Cap)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 4:37pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/49 "2019-11-08T16:37:00Z")
I’m not saying anyone is lying, but everyone is capable of making mistakes. The 99 plays differently/better for me than the m95, and we’ll just leave it at that. ---
**Author:** ![Art3misJinx](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/art3misjinx/32/106469_2.png) [@Art3misJinx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Art3misJinx)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/50 "2019-11-08T19:26:00Z")
> [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > I’m not saying anyone is lying, but everyone is capable of making mistakes. > > The 99 plays differently/better for me than the m95, and we’ll just leave it at that. The only people making “mistakes” is you and everyone else claiming bs when the actual stats doesn’t lie. ---
**Author:** ![StealthAria](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/958977/32.png) [@StealthAria](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/StealthAria)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/51 "2019-11-08T19:42:00Z")
> [@hkspm123](#): > > Smell a lot of , symthic doesn’t lie . It does, unfortunately. In BFV they decided that not all of a guns stats are determined by the gun or its ammo, for example the Boys and PzB have the same ballistic stats but the PzB ends up shooting significantly flatter than the Boys. You’ll also find that guns with similar recoil numbers in different categories (eg comparing an AR and SMG) will often have vastly different behavior. ---
**Author:** ![mf\_shro0m](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mf_shro0m/32/106941_2.png) [@mf\_shro0m](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mf_shro0m)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/52 "2019-11-08T19:55:00Z")
I’m a bit confused about the new sym stats. That number under bullet velocity’s drag right? How come it’s there for all guns even ARs and SMGs, I thought they didn’t have drag? ---
**Author:** ![mf\_shro0m](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mf_shro0m/32/106941_2.png) [@mf\_shro0m](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mf_shro0m)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 7:57pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/53 "2019-11-08T19:57:00Z")
> [@StealthAria](#): > > > [@hkspm123](#): > > > > Smell a lot of , symthic doesn’t lie . > > It does, unfortunately. In BFV they decided that not all of a guns stats are determined by the gun or its ammo, for example the Boys and PzB have the same ballistic stats but the PzB ends up shooting significantly flatter than the Boys. I’ve noticed that too. Any idea why that is? ---
**Author:** ![Art3misJinx](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/art3misjinx/32/106469_2.png) [@Art3misJinx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Art3misJinx)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/54 "2019-11-08T20:18:00Z")
> [@mf\_shro0m](#): > > I’m a bit confused about the new sym stats. That number under bullet velocity’s drag right? How come it’s there for all guns even ARs and SMGs, I thought they didn’t have drag? All the guns have drag. ---
**Author:** ![StealthAria](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/958977/32.png) [@StealthAria](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/StealthAria)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 8:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/55 "2019-11-08T20:48:00Z")
> [@mf\_shro0m](#): > > > [@StealthAria](#): > > > > > [@hkspm123](#): > > > > > > Smell a lot of , symthic doesn’t lie . > > > > It does, unfortunately. In BFV they decided that not all of a guns stats are determined by the gun or its ammo, for example the Boys and PzB have the same ballistic stats but the PzB ends up shooting significantly flatter than the Boys. > > I’ve noticed that too. Any idea why that is? They have multipliers coded into the engine somewhere probably, my guess would be server-side. It’s probably their way of trying to avoid backlash over their balancing BS. A lot of the changes they’ve made have been nothing more than placebos, especially all the “nerfs” they say they did to Assault. ---
**Author:** ![The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/the_berg_366/32/101051_2.png) [@The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/The_BERG_366)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2019, 10:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/56 "2019-11-08T22:26:00Z")
> [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > > > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > [@dandop\_oq7r7ppf](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Quote) > > > > > > > > Faster tactical reload than the m95 at the expense of 5 less damage at close range. It’s not much, but it’s something. > > > > > > > > But to be fair, there’s not really that much they can do with new bolt actions that isn’t already done by any of the other bolt actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well actually the M95 max damage of 80 goes to 30 meters > > > > > > > The Type 99 max damage of 75 only goes to 20 meters > > > > > > > So at 30 meters there’s actually a difference of 9 damage. > > > > > > > The types 99 has the steepest drop off of any BA > > > > > > > It’s minimum damage goes to 60 > > > > > > > While the m95 is 66 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also disagree. I think there’s lots they could do to the bolt actions. > > > > > > > They could of used a bullet velocity that hasn’t been used before. > > > > > > > Same goes for ROF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or they could of changed up the Spec tree. > > > > > > > Improve hip fire perhaps instead of Custom stock? > > > > > > > Or Increase damage range instead of Machine bolt? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, so why make a gun virtually the same except for less damage overall, and bigger damage dropoff? How is the, Arasaka balanced to make it competitive and different than the m95? > > > > > > > > > > > > I’ll tell you why. Its not the same. The Type 99 has less bullet drop. Aside from my experience with the m95, which is extensive, and the Krag, which even more extensive, I can just tell by using the Arasaka that it sits in between those two rifles as far as range/ bullet drop. The Krag, and m95 are/ were my two mains. I know the difference between these three bolt actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > When I tried playing the Type 99, like the m95, I was constantly shooting over heads. I dont care what Robenter, and the YouTube guys say, play the weapon for awhile and you will see. > > > > > > > > > > I think the developers overlooked it. > > > > > I won’t be surprised if the type 99 gets a small buff. > > > > > > > > > > There is no difference in Bullet drop. Both are identical. > > > > > Check out sym it’s the new Symthik site > > > > > They lay out extensive stats of each weapon, and you can compare them > > > > > > > > > > [https://sym.gg/](https://sym.gg/) > > > > > > > > I would normally support such a statement but when I tried the type 99 it felt like it had significantly faster bullet velocity than the Gewehr 95. normally I find the explanation of why something feels the way it does in the stats but not here. so either Im just being deceived by something or the stats aren’t the ones applicable to the version of the game I play. > > > > > > It doesn’t. > > > Velocity and bullet drop are identical. > > > Could be the sound of the rifle that is giving you the perception of a faster bullet or less drop > > > > no… > > I normally use the m95 and found that I have to remind myself to lead less when using the type 99. > > also I can read the stats myself, thank you, I know what they say. > > Well you are wrong. > If you wanna base weapon stats off of “feelings” and “gut instincts” > I can also do that. > I’ve put in close to 1000 hours into this game, and extensively play recon. > I can see virtually no difference between the two, when it comes to leading shots. > > I bet the sound and different scopes are playing tricks on you, and you perceive it to be different. dude stop… honestly. if I have to remind myself then I have to remind myself. that’s not an objective claim or anything that has to do with you. I’m not wrong when I say thst I have to remind myself… ffs. I already said that its probabaly me…geez… ---
**Author:** ![Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Tip_the_Cap)\ **Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 1:03am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/57 "2019-11-09T01:03:00Z")
> [@Art3misJinx](#): > > (Quote) > The only people making “mistakes” is you and everyone else claiming bs when the actual stats doesn’t lie. Dude, you are taking things about a game too seriously, and too personally. Care about ya! [Comment edited by a moderator] ---
**Author:** ![Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Tip_the_Cap)\ **Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 1:06am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/58 "2019-11-09T01:06:00Z")
> [@mf\_shro0m](#): > > > [@StealthAria](#): > > > > > [@hkspm123](#): > > > > > > Smell a lot of , symthic doesn’t lie . > > > > It does, unfortunately. In BFV they decided that not all of a guns stats are determined by the gun or its ammo, for example the Boys and PzB have the same ballistic stats but the PzB ends up shooting significantly flatter than the Boys. > > I’ve noticed that too. Any idea why that is? Velocity, which also can also be interpreted as bullet drop, and very often is. ---
**Author:** ![Art3misJinx](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/art3misjinx/32/106469_2.png) [@Art3misJinx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Art3misJinx)\ **Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 8:29am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/59 "2019-11-09T08:29:00Z")
> [@Tip\_the\_Cap](#): > > > [@Art3misJinx](#): > > > > [»] > > (Quote) > > The only people making “mistakes” is you and everyone else claiming bs when the actual stats doesn’t lie. > > Dude, you are taking things about a game too seriously, and too personally. It’s obvious you have another issue that is making you angry. You just need to recognize what it is, and address it. > > Care about ya! Imagine thinking someone is having issues because they call you out for saying other people make mistakes when it’s you that are making the mistakes instead of accepting the hard coded stats. ---
**Author:** ![GrizzGolf](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/grizzgolf/32/102129_2.png) [@GrizzGolf](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GrizzGolf)\ **Post date:** [November 9, 2019, 10:03am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373/60 "2019-11-09T10:03:00Z")
That the M95 is a beast [Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373.md?page=2) [Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/difference-between-m95-and-type-99/107373.md?page=4)