# Does anyone even use aperture sights?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [April 15, 2019, 10:56am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850 "2019-04-15T10:56:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 10:56am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/1 "2019-04-15T10:56:00Z")

</div>

For just an extra 0.5x magnification than the iron sights they give a darkened and limited view and to add an insult to injury the middle of the sights has a circle instead of a pin which is both obstructive and is not precise enough when one tries to go for headshots.

Is there even a single person who actually prefers using aperture sights over scopes or iron sights? I feel they need a major revamp to become something worth using?

If yes, do you think it is not unsuitable for precision weapons that need to go for the head to work well.?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirBobdk](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sirbobdk/32/103491_2.png) [@SirBobdk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SirBobdk)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 11:11am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/2 "2019-04-15T11:11:00Z")

</div>

No, it makes aiming much worse. I miss the kobra sight and visibility from BF4.

I use iron sight or 3 x zoom. I hate 3 x zoom, but the game forces you to use it in some way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GrinddalDDG](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/grinddalddg/32/102127_2.png) [@GrinddalDDG](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GrinddalDDG)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 11:18am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/3 "2019-04-15T11:18:00Z")

</div>

Nope, hate them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr\_X2345](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/bb73d2/32.png) [@Dr\_X2345](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Dr_X2345)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 11:25am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/4 "2019-04-15T11:25:00Z")

</div>

Occasionally I’ll use it on an AR, but apart from that not really. Actually I might have it equipped on my Model 8 when I use that.  
But yeah, making it so the reticle is more like a pin than a circle would make it much more usable, and making the outlines much sharper with less of a dark tint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirBobdk](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sirbobdk/32/103491_2.png) [@SirBobdk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SirBobdk)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 11:32am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/5 "2019-04-15T11:32:00Z")

</div>

Just me or does it seem that the sights and lack of visibility is made for “hide and seek” meaning firestorm and not the core game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 11:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/6 "2019-04-15T11:34:00Z")

</div>

> [@SirBobdk](#):
>
> Just me or does it seem that the sights and lack of visibility is made for “hide and seek” meaning firestorm and not the core game.

I do not know but it is ironic that it is supposedly an “rare” upgrade to the iron sights as far as Randomstorm is concerned, when it is actually a downgrade

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XPoorJudgmentX](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/xpoorjudgmentx/32/104126_2.png) [@XPoorJudgmentX](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/XPoorJudgmentX)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 11:41am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/7 "2019-04-15T11:41:00Z")

</div>

It is too bad that they do not have the Lyman Peep Site as it features a pin on the barrel of the weapon seen through the rear site.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElliotLH](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/elliotlh/32/101030_2.png) [@ElliotLH](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElliotLH)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 1:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/8 "2019-04-15T13:51:00Z")

</div>

Blergh. Nope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ragnarok013](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ragnarok013/32/103211_2.png) [@ragnarok013](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ragnarok013)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 2:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/9 "2019-04-15T14:23:00Z")

</div>

I don’t. Normally I just use the old standard iron sights as most of them are pretty good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VOLBANKER](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/dec6dc/32.png) [@VOLBANKER](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/VOLBANKER)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 2:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/10 "2019-04-15T14:48:00Z")

</div>

Recon’s Selbstlader 1906 has a 2X sight called “Standard sight” which is a great sight and how 2X sights should be on all guns.

I proposed this here

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 3:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/11 "2019-04-15T15:01:00Z")

</div>

> [@VOLBANKER](#):
>
> Recon’s Selbstlader 1906 has a 2X sight called “Standard sight” which is a great sight and how 2X sights should be on all guns.
> 
> I proposed this here

That would had been a major quality of life improvement

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@Tip\_the\_Cap](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Tip_the_Cap)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 3:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/12 "2019-04-15T15:24:00Z")

</div>

Those things suck big time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/noodlesocks/32/101045_2.png) [@Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Noodlesocks)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 3:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/13 "2019-04-15T15:25:00Z")

</div>

I use them on bolt action rifles from time to time because I find the forced TAA leads to the iron sights blurring into the terrain too much on certain maps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dingokillr/32/101728_2.png) [@DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DingoKillr)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 3:37pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/14 "2019-04-15T15:37:00Z")

</div>

I am currently trying, it still has some issues darkness is a major issue for .5x extra over ironsight which has less obstruction. To me it seem quicker to ADS than x3 scope.

The dish aperture on STG and G43 I have found to be pretty good for medium range.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jamesonoid](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jamesonoid/32/106799_2.png) [@Jamesonoid](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Jamesonoid)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 4:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/15 "2019-04-15T16:42:00Z")

</div>

No, I don’t care for them at all. I usually use irons on everything but snipers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![biketankbob](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/biketankbob/32/101341_2.png) [@biketankbob](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/biketankbob)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 4:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/16 "2019-04-15T16:47:00Z")

</div>

Currently using them on my Ross. Trying something different to eliminate scope glare. Love the 2x scope on 1906 Selbstlader.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pyr0Plazma](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/pyr0plazma/32/106472_2.png) [@Pyr0Plazma](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Pyr0Plazma)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 4:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/17 "2019-04-15T16:50:00Z")

</div>

Only use them on SLR’s due to scope glint on 3x. Really wish all REcon SLR’s got the same 2x as the sebby 1906.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ebca7d/32.png) [@PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PoppaPappo)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 9:14pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/18 "2019-04-15T21:14:00Z")

</div>

I’ve only liked them with the STG-44. I don’t know if it’s a bug or by design, but with the STG they don’t darken the area around the sight so you can still see your periphery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![y\_j\_es\_i](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/y_j_es_i/32/104162_2.png) [@y\_j\_es\_i](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/y_j_es_i)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 9:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/19 "2019-04-15T21:15:00Z")

</div>

> [@Dr\_X2345](#):
>
> Occasionally I’ll use it on an AR, but apart from that not really. Actually I might have it equipped on my Model 8 when I use that.  
> But yeah, making it so the reticle is more like a pin than a circle would make it much more usable, and making the outlines much sharper with less of a dark tint.

I used it on my ZH for a bit but there’s no point if you can kill the dude in 2 or 3 bullets. Even if you miss two, if he’s facing you then he’ll know where you are anyway and if he’s not facing you then he wouldn’t be able to see a x3’s scope glint. A x3’s scope glint makes it easier for them to fire back but if you’re killing everyone with 2-3 rounds then that shouldn’t matter

So ultimately I switched back to the x3

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jayremie570](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jayremie570/32/102375_2.png) [@Jayremie570](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Jayremie570)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2019, 1:29am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850/20 "2019-04-16T01:29:00Z")

</div>

If anyone is on the fence about the apature use it on the ribby. Bet you dont go back.

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/does-anyone-even-use-aperture-sights/106850.md?page=2)
