Battlefield game should focus on the big interesting maps, big land and naval battles.
Now the name of this game has zero meaning. Its hard call as BATTLEFIELD.
i admit that tanks are pretty bad, and that planes are rubbish too, when you compare them to bf4.
we already have the ingredients for domination and all it needs is to be enabled, it wouldn’t cost anything for the conquest players.
But also admitting that they need to make tanks more fun and planes more fun, like add a skill gap, add speed control for planes.
also boats and naval battles sounds good to me.
Sorry if I was unclear, but, no, I really am not saying BF should be infantry only. I was holding up what the OP said and saying “good grief” as an expression of exasperation that anyone could play BF and hold that opinion.
Battlefield is all about mixed discipline, large scale warfare and that’s what it’s fans love. Coming to a BF forum and suggesting it should be more infantry focused is ridiculous.
“Is it trolling or irony?” I honestly am not sure if the OP is trolling for reaction or trying to be funny, because…
“In the first Battlefield iteration that feels like vehicles are an underpowered afterthought, people are suggesting that those that like infantry gameplay aren’t welcome?” BF5, to me, is the most infantry-friendly version because devs have, unfortunately, made vehicles weak and un-fun, yet the OP is suggesting infantry doesn’t feel welcome? They are the most welcome (unfortunately) that they have ever been, in BF5, yet he still complains.
““battlefield has always had infrantry domination”. Good grief.” I highlight this particular comment, because it highlights the OP’s ignorance. Battlefield is the best shooter because it is not all about infantry. Or it shouldn’t be…
I was trying not to be unkind to the OP, because perhaps he is new to the franchise. Anyone who knows BF knows that the multi-discipline combat (not being infantry-centric) is one of the franchise’s main strengths. Well, it usually is, though it seems, in BF5, they aren’t so bothered anymore.
To all the haters - I’ll laugh when dice removes cq to funnel ppl into firestorm 
I loved dom and had a good time while it was active on marita.
I’ll never understand why some people defend the removal of a (imo) core mode.
We get it, you didn’t like dom but what do you stand to lose if others get (to keep) what they liked?!
They’re just selfish and think a company the size of Dice should be tailor making games for them
they got nothing but game modes devoted to infantry. rush, squad conquest, domination, new 5v5, frontline even, breakthrough, conquest, tdm, grind, outpost grind, …
Honestly, DICE should condense the gamemodes down to 3. Conquest, Breakthrough, and Domination. Everything else seems more like an afterthought, or just a slight variation of one these modes, except TDM, which just straight up doesn’t belong in Battlefield.
[flaming]
Your hatred for this game knows no bounds and while it is justified in some cases I’d like to ask you to stop and think for a second before you attack other players for their preferences.
Putting the blame for bfs downfall on some for liking an objective based inf mode is ridiculous.
I couldn’t care less about 5vs5 btw.
Op is ridiculous dice is literally releasing infantry only stuff. You have nothing to complain about marita infantry only al soondan tdm infantry only coming soon metro infantry only and the other 2 maps that were shown at gamescon all infantry only. The game is infantry focused vehicles are garbage there’s only 1 map that is even catered for vehicles and that is panzerstorm the rest of the maps play like veichles weren’t even a factor in the design process. They feel out of place especially firestorm with those trash tanks made out of cardboard that can’t even down infantry with armor plates.
I don’t think it’s the maps, it’s more the modes that we have lost out on domination was popular, rush was popular not so much in BFV but older games and a 5v5 or 8v8 just isn’t good enough really.
Sure people like conquest but it is not the only thing people buy battlefield for.
yes.
@ProAssassin2003
Do not post inflammatory posts, As it is a violation of the rules.
thank you. And to other reader, i do not imply that ea should make bfv infrantry only i am only askin for it to come back. (domination)
I also like conquest as well.
Thats is all fine. I will let the actions and game speak for itself. Tell DICE to continue to cater to Infantry only players. Battlefield will be dead in less then 3 years.
Don’t say I didn’t warn everyone.
No-ones asking Dice to only cater to infantry only players. The only people asking Dice to cater for just one group of players are people like you who want Dice to only cater to the people who like vehicle heavy conquest games
OP just asked for Dice to bring some modes back. If you don’t like them then just stick to conquest, no-one would care and no-one would try to stop you
well yes this is true, im only asking for them to bring back some modes, and like i said in earlier posts which i am not sure why proassain did not read or missed? that I also like conquest, and like i said the ingrediants are there already and they just need to enable those modes.
I am just read the tittle of this post.
what! Not enough small game modes 
Cod is your game my friend. Bye
no thats not what the title says
Careful what you wish for.
With an already dwindling player base, it’s unwise to tell people to go play something else (especially when the new COD looks more like a true battlefield game than the current battlefield game).