I think they learned their lesson when EA’s stock price when from $148 to $73…that certainly got their attention.
You think so?
A normal person would think “Gee I need to do better from now on” Perhaps I should cut the losses by reducing the pointlessly high executive’s pay
.
A triple A will say "Not enough money! Not enough cattle to milk! Must lay off low wage employees to keep the executive bonuses in the millions! Must make BF even more like CoD even though CoD tries to be more like BF! Must bring more cattle by pointlessly trying to please demographics who do not play my games anyway! Must rush more half finished game and fill them with microtransactions and surprise mechanics!
Hi,
Video in the following link - shows play, and you can see the opposition :
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-news-coming-at-gamesco/1100-6469174/
Regards,
Shadders_X.
20vs20 already crashed for pc.
“I think they’ll successfully pull in a lot of people from other games to come and try Call of Duty again. That seems like what they’re going for.” -GameSpot
Well it’s working. I haven’t played since Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare in 2007. So this will be the first CoD I’ve bought in 10 years.
Modern Warfare 2019 looks amazing! Weapons look and sound realistic. But the thing that’s really roped me in is the large scale modes with big maps, high player counts, and drivable vehicles.
I believe all vehicles are call in after kill streaks. But the light tank is a 2 seater. So even if your not getting the kills. You can hop in with a friend that does. I guess that body armor and mini gun is a call in and they play the music Heavy Metal from Sammy Hagar. Still worried the game wont hold up for 50vs50 for this gen consoles. When DrDisRespect and other streamers went to that place to test out the 20vs20 it crashed for them on pc. Then another youtuber said the maps are a bit large for 20vs20. Tons of hiding spots and clutter.
I’ve just seen that with the ‘Dark Edition’ of the game, you get a pair of night-vision goggles too :lol:
But by the way things are looking, Modern Warfare at its current state is less buggy and runs smoother than what Battlefield does, which has had just under 10 months to sort its out.
I’ve always had my buzz on for Battlefield, even for BF1 (I loved the stripped back to basics approach to it and thought the historical aspect of it was tastefully done). But with BFV on the other hand… it’s just been dreadful, ever since its release with the ‘ello old friend’ bombshell..
As excited as I am for COD, I’m equally interested to see what Battlefield releases in an attempt to keep it’s dwindling player base. I honestly don’t think they’ll be able to pull it out of the bag
50vs50 was being tested and is not set in stone.
32vs32 will suffice
I think DICE need to be very very careful. I’ve been playing since the start and loved bf2 and 3. Having just bought and played bf5 for the past 2 wks I’m just so sad to see how the game has become.
The game is now a single payer Deathmatch which has some interesting maps but really it’s only infantry battle. There is such a big disconnect between planes and other vehicles not sure if you can call 5 a battlefield game.
The game (as the name battlefield implies) USED to mean large maps filled with vehicles, planes, buildings in which one could battle in an almost sandbox like game.
If DICE wanted to bring the franchise back to its core they could easily add some large maps and increase vechiles count. They could also remove some unnecessary animations and most importantly make it fun again.
I think there is a game underneath it all, maybe some future maps will fix some problems. Oh and of course increase player count.
Otherwise if cod gives me that good old battlefield feeling then I see no reason why I wouldn’t play it. I’ve actually been playing bf3 in 4k again, such a fun game…
Gonna try the beta, and see how that goes. You can play the beta Sept 12 depending on what platform.
I’m going to give the beta a try but Im still highly skeptical of Activision and I’m still skeptical of how the COD formula translates to big maps with large player counts.
I’ll wait till I get my hands on it. I’m sure they will find a way to turn me off of it but I’ll reserve my judgement till then
The new COD lost me when I found out it cross platforms with PC.
BF3 and 4 are better games than the new COD will be. 1 and 5 look and play bad.
Does it?! Lol. That will be hilarious.
It’s bad enough that DICE don’t balance the console and PC games separately, to actually have cross-platform play is… just Lol.
Still, if CoD is doing it, I expect DICE to add it into Battlefield imminently.
Not positive, but I think I read that you will need to opt in for it to be cross platform.
It is opt in and based on peripheral. I’m all for it. looking forward to the 20v20 as well, sure they’ll be some balance issues at first but willing to give them a chance.
I’m sure there’s a tab to pick and choose what is cross platform connected. Cause PC with mouse and keyboard would kill off the console players.
This is also what I’ve heard.
I believe it will also match people based on their input device. So it will try to put controller with controller and kb+m with kb+m.