# g6 is ez mode vs all planes.

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/g6-is-ez-mode-vs-all-planes/107549>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 26, 2020, 4:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/g6-is-ez-mode-vs-all-planes/107549 "2020-06-26T16:09:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2020, 6:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/g6-is-ez-mode-vs-all-planes/107549/21 "2020-07-18T06:45:00Z")

</div>

> [@rainkloud](#):
>
> > [@xKusagamix](#):
> >
> > Asymmetrical vehicles is garbage and especially the upgrade spec. Aside from difference models for each faction, they should alway have the same spec.
> 
> Antiquated, outdated and obsolete. Asymmetry introduces more variety and reduces the instances of stale predictable meta emerging that favors elite pilots who master one specific facet of combat. Taking players out of their comfort zone is generally a good thing. I don’t want to see 20 planes in the game but they’re all Ryu vs Ryu color swapped gis.
> 
> Having said that, execution (as in most things) is paramount so asymmetry done well is heads and shoulders above clone vehicles but much worse if done poorly.

You need to always assume that DICE will do something poorly. Especially right now.

Just like [super bad cooks who think they know what they are doing](https://battlefieldforum.co/EN-US/home/leaving?target=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FcQZ1wH8kgV4%3Ft%3D173) in some comedy TV series.  
.  
So it is better to have them do something simple that can be effed up less royally than something more complex gone wrong.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/g6-is-ez-mode-vs-all-planes/107549.md?page=1)