# Getting mad at these low fps

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898>\
**Category:** PC\
**Created:** [January 30, 2017, 8:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898 "2017-01-30T20:05:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bulletsearl](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ea666f/32.png) [@bulletsearl](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bulletsearl)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 11:24am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/21 "2017-01-31T11:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@Mannomio](#):
>
> GTX 980 is not the best anymore, not if you want to play on ultra or high. Game’s like Battlefield 1 are very demanding in terms of GPU.

I have to disagree.  
BF1 runs 1080p all ultra steady 60fps with GTX970 or RX470 no problem, even a HD7870 is sufficient.  
For how good it looks, it’s incredible low on GPU requirement.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emremertozcan](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/e68b1a/32.png) [@emremertozcan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/emremertozcan)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 11:41am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/22 "2017-01-31T11:41:00Z")

</div>

> [@freakingcrazy](#):
>
> > [@Frey960](#):
> >
> > I may consider upgrading my ram, i’ll keep that in mind, thanks
> 
> he is right,upgrade your ram to 2x8 modules and it should be much beter,its running in single channel now what kills the performance with 2 moduels in runs in dual channel.Plus memory speed is also important

what about 4+4+8? does it kill performance?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![freakingcrazy](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/eada6e/32.png) [@freakingcrazy](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/freakingcrazy)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 11:57am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/23 "2017-01-31T11:57:00Z")

</div>

Yes you need 2 or 4 sticks and off The same size, just buy 1x 8gb to get 2x8gb

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kajjal](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Kajjal](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Kajjal)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 12:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/24 "2017-01-31T12:43:00Z")

</div>

Dual channel works by effectively combining the bandwidth of both memory sticks in a single larger one for better performance. A single 8gb will not work in dual channel as it has nothing to combine with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ninja\_dragon\_srb](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ninja_dragon_srb/32/104923_2.png) [@Ninja\_dragon\_srb](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Ninja_dragon_srb)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 8:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/25 "2017-01-31T20:09:00Z")

</div>

> [@Kajjal](#):
>
> Dual channel works by effectively combining the bandwidth of both memory sticks in a single larger one for better performance. A single 8gb will not work in dual channel as it has nothing to combine with.

I understand. But do that modules have to be exactly the same models? I do not mean on MHz, I am talking about timing settings. Can we use 2 different manufactures on lets say 8GB/1600MHz, and manually set timing parameters in bios?

Cheers

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LinkZeppeloyd](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/linkzeppeloyd/32/104893_2.png) [@LinkZeppeloyd](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/LinkZeppeloyd)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 9:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/26 "2017-01-31T21:06:00Z")

</div>

> [@Mannomio](#):
>
> GTX 980 is not the best anymore, not if you want to play on ultra or high. Game’s like Battlefield 1 are very demanding in terms of GPU.
> 
> So, what sets are you playing on ? High? Ultra?

Lol you guys think him getting 0-10 fps is because he has a gtx 980? I mean, mine puts out around 80-100fps on mostly ultra and 120 rez scale, with an i5 4670k.

There’s obviously some issue apart from just hardware specs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Z-Crashpilot1001](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/54ee81/32.png) [@Z-Crashpilot1001](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Z-Crashpilot1001)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 10:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/27 "2017-01-31T22:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@Ninja\_dragon\_srb](#):
>
> > [@freakingcrazy](#):
> >
> > > [@Frey960](#):
> > >
> > > I may consider upgrading my ram, i’ll keep that in mind, thanks
> > 
> > he is right,upgrade your ram to 2x8 modules and it should be much beter,its running in single channel now what kills the performance with 2 moduels in runs in dual channel.Plus memory speed is also important
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have the same problem, and I have also been advised to install aditional ram for dual channel mode. My question is:
> 
> I have installed TEMPORARY aditional 2x2GB of ram at same speed in free slots, but I seem to cant notice any improvement in performance. Order of dimms used now:
> 
> 1: 2GB  
> 2: 8GB  
> 3: 2GB  
> 4: empty
> 
> My MoBo documentation says that dimms 2 and 4 are meant for dual channel mode. (MSI gaming 3 Z97). Now I can notice that ram usage is not more than 8 GB, and readings in MSI Afterburner tell me that pagefile is over 9GB. Of course, i have Samsung SSD SATA 3.
> 
> Will I achieve something by installing only 2x8GB in dual channel mode? (buying another 8GB module)
> 
> Thank you all!
> 
> Cheers.

Look at page 15 of the Manual. From what I understands it means this:

Case1 - 2 equal RAM sticks:  
You have to put them into DIMM2 and DIMM4.

Case2 - 4 equal RAM sticks:  
Simply populate all.

“To ensure system stability, memory modules must be of the same type and density in Dual-Channel mode.”

Here is what my mobo manual says:  
“You may install varying memory sizes in Channel A and Channel B. The system maps  
the total size of the lower-sized channel for the dual-channel configuration.  
Any excess memory from the higher-sized channel is then mapped for single-channel operation”

I think the same logic should apply to Intel systems as well. I think the MSI doc can be misunderstood.  
P.s.: And yes, go for dualchannel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kajjal](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Kajjal](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Kajjal)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 10:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/28 "2017-01-31T22:43:00Z")

</div>

> [@Ninja\_dragon\_srb](#):
>
> > [@Kajjal](#):
> >
> > Dual channel works by effectively combining the bandwidth of both memory sticks in a single larger one for better performance. A single 8gb will not work in dual channel as it has nothing to combine with.
> 
> I understand. But do that modules have to be exactly the same models? I do not mean on MHz, I am talking about timing settings. Can we use 2 different manufactures on lets say 8GB/1600MHz, and manually set timing parameters in bios?
> 
> Cheers

To be sure yes, best to get exactly the same module again. Brand , model, speed, latency etc. That way you are sure it works. When I went to 16GB I put in an extra 2 x 4GB of exactly the same RAM as I already had.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GiveMeBFBC3ffs](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/3bc359/32.png) [@GiveMeBFBC3ffs](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GiveMeBFBC3ffs)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2017, 8:06am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/29 "2017-02-06T08:06:00Z")

</div>

dont waste your time getting this issue fixed, BF1 isnt worth it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ninja\_dragon\_srb](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ninja_dragon_srb/32/104923_2.png) [@Ninja\_dragon\_srb](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Ninja_dragon_srb)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2017, 1:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/30 "2017-02-06T13:15:00Z")

</div>

Solved by reinstalling win10 from scratch, and installing 4x4 modules. Fps is stable mostly, since not all maps are well optimised. On sinai desert I get 80-110 fps and on amiens I get 65-85 fps. But no drops are present..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Z-Crashpilot1001](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/54ee81/32.png) [@Z-Crashpilot1001](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Z-Crashpilot1001)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2017, 2:17pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898/31 "2017-02-06T14:17:00Z")

</div>

THX for the success feedback!!

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/getting-mad-at-these-low-fps/103898.md?page=1)
