# Grenade types

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 4, 2016, 4:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669 "2016-06-04T16:01:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bananahead81/32/101282_2.png) [@bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bananahead81)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/1 "2016-06-04T16:01:00Z")

</div>

Who here would like to hazard a guess as to how many different types of grenades we can be looking forward to and what they may be? I would love to sit in the zepelin throwing impact grenades all over the place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/2 "2016-06-04T16:07:00Z")

</div>

There was a tank grenade confirmed right?  
And I would have to think there will be a smoke or gas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bananahead81/32/101282_2.png) [@bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bananahead81)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/3 "2016-06-04T16:09:00Z")

</div>

> [@visegrip117](#):
>
> There was a tank grenade confirmed right?

Not sure i don’t remember it. I did see the interview at the reveal but i’ve probably forgotten loads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:16pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/4 "2016-06-04T16:16:00Z")

</div>

I’m almost positive they confirmed it. And I believe the assault class gets its. But someone with a better memory would have to verify that for me

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bananahead81/32/101282_2.png) [@bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bananahead81)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/5 "2016-06-04T16:18:00Z")

</div>

> [@visegrip117](#):
>
> There was a tank grenade confirmed right?  
> And I would have to think there will be a smoke or gas.

Do i recall seeing gas masks in the short video or am i mixing my memory of something else up here? Gas seems likely to me as well as smoke. I was thinking about some kind of petrol bomb/fire grenade too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/6 "2016-06-04T16:24:00Z")

</div>

Yes there was a clip of gas masks as well as some type of greenish gas. Is that gas from a grenade?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bananahead81/32/101282_2.png) [@bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bananahead81)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 4:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/7 "2016-06-04T16:51:00Z")

</div>

I have no idea… I have no idea if they used gas in WW1 and if so how it was delivered. Maybe a grenade or maybe a bomb or something? Gas bombs from plane?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 8:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/8 "2016-06-04T20:52:00Z")

</div>

Well there’s no under barrel grenade launchers, so that’s out. Possibly from mortars?

I guess anything a possible for the sake of balance and gameplay

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Troopperfofo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/eb9ed0/32.png) [@Troopperfofo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Troopperfofo)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 9:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/9 "2016-06-04T21:50:00Z")

</div>

> [@visegrip117](#):
>
> Well there’s no under barrel grenade launchers, so that’s out. Possibly from mortars?
> 
> I guess anything a possible for the sake of balance and gameplay

no underbarrel grenade launchers but there was Rifle Grenades

 ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/8/6/86a047f5a1b246d837124d46fea6470f664eace2.jpeg)

There was also a rather odd piece of equipment called a Trench catapult ( more a large slingshot) meant to lob grenades.

it would be a rather unique thing to use in game if they want to include it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/eada6e/32.png) [@JuveOG1105](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JuveOG1105)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 10:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/10 "2016-06-04T22:13:00Z")

</div>

> [@bananahead81](#):
>
> I have no idea… I have no idea if they used gas in WW1 and if so how it was delivered. Maybe a grenade or maybe a bomb or something? Gas bombs from plane?

Gas was more of an artillery thing. There was chlorine and mustard gas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/visegrip117/32/104005_2.png) [@visegrip117](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/visegrip117)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2016, 10:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/11 "2016-06-04T22:48:00Z")

</div>

> [@Troopperfofo](#):
>
> > [@visegrip117](#):
> >
> > Well there’s no under barrel grenade launchers, so that’s out. Possibly from mortars?
> > 
> > I guess anything a possible for the sake of balance and gameplay
> 
> no underbarrel grenade launchers but there was Rifle Grenades
> 
> ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/8/6/86a047f5a1b246d837124d46fea6470f664eace2.jpeg)
> 
> There was also a rather odd piece of equipment called a Trench catapult ( more a large slingshot) meant to lob grenades.
> 
> it would be a rather unique thing to use in game if they want to include it.

Interesting

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jeffmasman](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/ecc23a/32.png) [@jeffmasman](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/jeffmasman)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 1:23am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/12 "2016-06-05T01:23:00Z")

</div>

I’m sure there is a sticky anti tank grenade (fashioned in saving private Ryan)

Dynamite w dentonator

Primed mortars

German potato grenades (upgraded versions featured in ww2)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/homicidejack/32/102225_2.png) [@HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HomicideJack)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 1:58am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/13 "2016-06-05T01:58:00Z")

</div>

They didn’t have gas grenades during the First World War, nor did they have smoke grenades. They did, however, have artillery shells that contained tear gas, chlorine gas and mustard gas, the latter two of which were actually banned from warfare by the Geneva Convention.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Troopperfofo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/eb9ed0/32.png) [@Troopperfofo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Troopperfofo)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 4:42am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/14 "2016-06-05T04:42:00Z")

</div>

Frisbee grenade.

Alright its just disk shaped but I imagine you would be able throw it like a Frisbee.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dingokillr/32/101728_2.png) [@DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DingoKillr)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 4:54am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/15 "2016-06-05T04:54:00Z")

</div>

> [@HomicideJack](#):
>
> They didn’t have gas grenades during the First World War, nor did they have smoke grenades. They did, however, have artillery shells that contained tear gas, chlorine gas and mustard gas, the latter two of which were actually banned from warfare by the Geneva Convention.

What the 1864? It talked about chemical as killing agents, not impairment agent which chlorine and mustard are designed as.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/homicidejack/32/102225_2.png) [@HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HomicideJack)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 5:14am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/16 "2016-06-05T05:14:00Z")

</div>

> [@DingoKillr](#):
>
> > [@HomicideJack](#):
> >
> > They didn’t have gas grenades during the First World War, nor did they have smoke grenades. They did, however, have artillery shells that contained tear gas, chlorine gas and mustard gas, the latter two of which were actually banned from warfare by the Geneva Convention.
> 
> What the 1864? It talked about chemical as killing agents, not impairment agent which chlorine and mustard are designed as.

No, the Protocol of 1925.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dingokillr/32/101728_2.png) [@DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DingoKillr)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 5:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/17 "2016-06-05T05:17:00Z")

</div>

BF1 is 1914-18 before 1925

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/homicidejack/32/102225_2.png) [@HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HomicideJack)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 5:21am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/18 "2016-06-05T05:21:00Z")

</div>

No ? I was adding to context that they were later banned from use in warfare.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dingokillr/32/101728_2.png) [@DingoKillr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DingoKillr)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 5:40am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/19 "2016-06-05T05:40:00Z")

</div>

Well you should have been clear. To many read here and think it is fact. Like the last week a well known YouTuber made a comment about how Canada entered WW1, he is wrong. Yet his minion think he is right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/homicidejack/32/102225_2.png) [@HomicideJack](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HomicideJack)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2016, 3:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669/20 "2016-06-05T15:24:00Z")

</div>

Canada was in the war, though. Since Great Britain declared war the rest of the commonwealth was also required to participate, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, ect. In fact, Australia had one of the highest mortality rates in the entire war in relation to the number of men in their standing armies.

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/grenade-types/101669.md?page=2)
