# Hardcore Bullet Damage - What you would want?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [April 3, 2017, 2:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961 "2017-04-03T14:40:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Braddock512](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/braddock512/32/101011_2.png) [@Braddock512](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Braddock512)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/1 "2017-04-03T14:40:00Z")

</div>

Hey everyone,

If you could set the Hardcore Bullet Damage, what would you set it as?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Braddock512](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/braddock512/32/101011_2.png) [@Braddock512](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Braddock512)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/2 "2017-04-03T14:43:00Z")

</div>

Hey everyone -

It appears the little vote button is a bit hidden. Apologies. We’ll work on that.  
It’s right beside the View Results button, so when you make your selection, click that VOTE button and you’re good to go.

-Braddock512-

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DANNYonPC](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/f19dbf/32.png) [@DANNYonPC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DANNYonPC)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/3 "2017-04-03T14:48:00Z")

</div>

125 or 150, Still having to actually aim while decreasing the bullets to kill slightly

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CrimeSceneKitty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/crimescenekitty/32/101581_2.png) [@CrimeSceneKitty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CrimeSceneKitty)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/4 "2017-04-03T14:53:00Z")

</div>

IDK, I feel that the old original system was better, but did make “God Tier” weapons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CommanderWacky](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/fbc32d/32.png) [@CommanderWacky](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CommanderWacky)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:56pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/5 "2017-04-03T14:56:00Z")

</div>

I think 150 will do.

> [@DANNYonPC](#):
>
> 125 or 150, Still having to actually aim while decreasing the bullets to kill slightly

+1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babyhuehnchen](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/babyhuehnchen/32/101267_2.png) [@Babyhuehnchen](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Babyhuehnchen)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/6 "2017-04-03T14:58:00Z")

</div>

id be for 175, not too much but no too less

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EzyPzyJapaneze](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ezypzyjapaneze/32/101903_2.png) [@EzyPzyJapaneze](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/EzyPzyJapaneze)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 2:59pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/7 "2017-04-03T14:59:00Z")

</div>

As much as I despise hardcore in battlefield 1, I and many many other would like it if the damage would be 200%.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marchiore](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/marchiore/32/102738_2.png) [@marchiore](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/marchiore)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/8 "2017-04-03T15:09:00Z")

</div>

> [@Babyhuehnchen](#):
>
> id be for 175, not too much but no too less

+1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iceman16p](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/b4bc9f/32.png) [@iceman16p](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iceman16p)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/9 "2017-04-03T15:18:00Z")

</div>

I like 200%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KingTolapsium](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kingtolapsium/32/102530_2.png) [@KingTolapsium](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KingTolapsium)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/10 "2017-04-03T15:18:00Z")

</div>

Whatever value is implemented.

PLEASE CONSIDER REDUCING HARDCORE LIMB DAMAGE.

Maybe we could even disable auto-rotation aim assist in this mode, so you know.. snipers weren’t auto-aiming infantry flattening machines.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LordChristoff](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/lordchristoff/32/102670_2.png) [@LordChristoff](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/LordChristoff)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/11 "2017-04-03T15:21:00Z")

</div>

Hardcore is hardcore for a reason, can we please have it back to how it was in BF4 please?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SgtFrenchi](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sgtfrenchi/32/103436_2.png) [@SgtFrenchi](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SgtFrenchi)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/12 "2017-04-03T15:21:00Z")

</div>

We need weapon balance, 200dmg dstroy it

For me 150dmg is perfect:  
2 hits/kill on Self-loading Rifles  
3-4 hits/kill on LMG’s

Special mechanic for snipers. You need a chest/head shoot for OHK outside of “sweet spot”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tastemyjuices](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@tastemyjuices](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/tastemyjuices)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/13 "2017-04-03T15:24:00Z")

</div>

150-175 would do well. And we would love to see a classic style hardcore. BF4 Style.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Braddock512](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/braddock512/32/101011_2.png) [@Braddock512](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Braddock512)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/14 "2017-04-03T15:25:00Z")

</div>

> [@tastemyjuices](#):
>
> 150-175 would do well. And we would love to see a classic style hardcore. BF4 Style.

Details?  
-Braddock512-

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zobtzler](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/71c47a/32.png) [@Zobtzler](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Zobtzler)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/15 "2017-04-03T15:31:00Z")

</div>

Given 60% in BF4, which is 166.66666… in comparison… 175 is the closest followed by 150. Depends on what people want.  
However I myself would like the weapons to be rebalanced for hardcore (having different damage models in hardcore and normal) so that it is as good as possible

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KingTolapsium](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kingtolapsium/32/102530_2.png) [@KingTolapsium](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KingTolapsium)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/16 "2017-04-03T15:34:00Z")

</div>

> [@Zobtzler](#):
>
> Given 60% in BF4, which is 166.66666… in comparison… 175 is the closest followed by 150. Depends on what people want.  
> However I myself would like the weapons to be rebalanced for hardcore (having different damage models in hardcore and normal) so that it is as good as possible

100% agree.

Hardcore is very poorly implemented.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpectaJin](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/spectajin/32/103576_2.png) [@SpectaJin](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SpectaJin)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/17 "2017-04-03T15:43:00Z")

</div>

- **Sniping** should be 1 shot kill, unless you shoot in the limb/arm (area should not make up more than 10% of body area) that would result in a damage of around 80-95%
- **SMG** :

- 
  - Headshots = lights out

- Bodyshots = 2-3 shots
- Limbs/Arms = 4-5 shots\*
- **Self Loading Rifles**

- 
  - Headshots = lights out

- Bodyshots = 1-2 shots
- Limbs/Arms = 3-4 shots

-

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ram1c](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/97f17d/32.png) [@Ram1c](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Ram1c)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:45pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/18 "2017-04-03T15:45:00Z")

</div>

175% for sure so at least the snipers wouldn’t be one hit to the limbs. I find this a little annoying playing on 200% damage. I’ve been playing hardcore religiously since bc2 and I think it’s too much. The 175% would give everyone that bf4 hardcore feel that everyone’s been craving (certainly I have).

> [@Zobtzler](#):
>
> Given 60% in BF4, which is 166.66666… in comparison… 175 is the closest followed by 150. Depends on what people want.  
> However I myself would like the weapons to be rebalanced for hardcore (having different damage models in hardcore and normal) so that it is as good as possible

I never understood why they never modeled the weapon damage to hardcore standards and then just add the multiplier for normal. It would certainly give a more overall balance to all modes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D5RAT](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/d5rat/32/100944_2.png) [@D5RAT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/D5RAT)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/19 "2017-04-03T15:49:00Z")

</div>

Got to be 175 or 200 ..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imTacticalTurtle](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/imtacticalturtle/32/102303_2.png) [@imTacticalTurtle](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/imTacticalTurtle)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2017, 3:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961/20 "2017-04-03T15:49:00Z")

</div>

150% will do. 200% is just 1-2 shot kill left and right :\ no skill, and no fun

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hardcore-bullet-damage-what-you-would-want/102961.md?page=2)
