# Heavy Tanks - Tiger / Churchill

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [December 21, 2018, 3:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230 "2018-12-21T03:45:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShadowONYOU](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/a698b9/32.png) [@ShadowONYOU](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ShadowONYOU)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 3:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230/1 "2018-12-21T03:45:00Z")

</div>

It’s my first week in this game, and i saw a major problem with heavy tanks. How can a light tank survive to 3 shots of a 88mm gun from a Tiger or 4 well placed, i said well placed shots from a churchill and there is more, the amazing frontal armor of 100mm iron reinforced looks like more with a paper when a simple Panzerfaust or a PIAT hit. Heavy tanks were made to receive Dmg and be on the front, i know its hard to balanced the game with the reality but the current state of the game put one of the highest symbol of war in a pocket.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokintom214](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@smokintom214](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/smokintom214)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 4:14am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230/2 "2018-12-21T04:14:00Z")

</div>

If tanks were made to be historically accurate in game… They would never die. All we would be complaining about is how tanks just camp objectives taking 5 damage from a piat with a support behind him healing the whole time. The only time a tank would have to leave is to refill ammo… Also, if a tank never dies, how will you get a tank if it’s just 1 per side?

BFV is more focused on squad play. BF1 is a lead reason why tanks are what we have now and the vast majority of Battlefield players complained about how they were a 1 man army… But the best tanks right now are the Valentine/panzer stag/38t and the M-AA tanks.. the tiger is a tank that needs squad support. But an ace tanker can wreck alot of players solo with tiger. It’s only real downside is it’s speed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GalIahad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/5daacb/32.png) [@GalIahad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GalIahad)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 6:32am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230/3 "2018-12-21T06:32:00Z")

</div>

So? Light tanks are still one man armies, but heavy tanks have to suffer? That makes little sense in my opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokintom214](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@smokintom214](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/smokintom214)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 6:36am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230/4 "2018-12-21T06:36:00Z")

</div>

Light tanks are by all means not a one man army… They die twice as fast. You’re essentially trading armor for a all around faster tank. Theoretically, I do see your point. Tigers should have slightly more armor on the front making them alittle harder to take out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tony-yingc](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/ed8c4c/32.png) [@Tony-yingc](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Tony-yingc)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 6:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230/5 "2018-12-21T06:52:00Z")

</div>

> [@smokintom214](#):
>
> Light tanks are by all means not a one man army… They die twice as fast. You’re essentially trading armor for a all around faster tank. Theoretically, I do see your point. Tigers should have slightly more armor on the front making them alittle harder to take out.

In fact T17/P38 are the best tank, Mark enemies or support infantry anti vehicle they can do every thing,and they are fast , why u think they die twice as fast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GalIahad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/5daacb/32.png) [@GalIahad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GalIahad)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 6:59am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/heavy-tanks-tiger-churchill/106230/6 "2018-12-21T06:59:00Z")

</div>

Maybe because he is using them as a heavy tank? The lightest tanks are mind blowingly op right now, while heavy tanks are rather useless. When it comes to balance, it just screams “Screw Logic”

_Edited to remove swearing. Let’s watch the language, please. - EA\_Cian_
