# hellriegal vs parabellum 14/17

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [October 29, 2017, 2:04am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257 "2017-10-29T02:04:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![huricanechuck](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/8c91f0/32.png) [@huricanechuck](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/huricanechuck)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 2:04am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/1 "2017-10-29T02:04:00Z")

</div>

which do you like better ? which do you think is easier to use? personally , i love my parabellum. although i still think the hellriegal is much easier to use. would like to hear any thoughts or comments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronTheZombie](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/aaronthezombie/32/101126_2.png) [@AaronTheZombie](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AaronTheZombie)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 3:49am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/2 "2017-10-29T03:49:00Z")

</div>

> [@huricanechuck](#):
>
> which do you like better ?

MG14/17

> [@huricanechuck](#):
>
> which do you think is easier to use?

Hellriegel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_yakuza17](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@the\_yakuza17](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/the_yakuza17)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 4:03am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/3 "2017-10-29T04:03:00Z")

</div>

Hellriegel is easier to use for sure. The MG14/17 Low Weight is harder to control unless bipoded, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![woll3](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/woll3/32/104081_2.png) [@woll3](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/woll3)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 6:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/4 "2017-10-29T06:52:00Z")

</div>

Not really comparable considering spread mechanics, not to mention that they are in different classes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikebostonmike](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/90ced4/32.png) [@mikebostonmike](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mikebostonmike)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 11:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/5 "2017-10-29T11:33:00Z")

</div>

Hellriegel’s for knobs. So easy… parabellum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![APBT](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/ce7236/32.png) [@APBT](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/APBT)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 1:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/6 "2017-10-29T13:20:00Z")

</div>

It depends on how either is being used.

Bipoded the Parabellum shines and on the move the Hell is favorable.

In my experience, clearing out rooms, the Parabellum is King.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gmkillers](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Gmkillers](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Gmkillers)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 1:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/7 "2017-10-29T13:42:00Z")

</div>

Hellreigel is a noon weapon. Atleast the MG14 requires some skill due to the recoil.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ashar\_saleem121](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/779978/32.png) [@ashar\_saleem121](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ashar_saleem121)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 3:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/8 "2017-10-29T15:24:00Z")

</div>

If youre trying to defend a hallway, the parabellum will rip people apart. And if youre any good, you can make it work short range.

But overall the hellriegel is easier to use I would say since you will encounter more favorable situations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plasticman883](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/e95f7d/32.png) [@plasticman883](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/plasticman883)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 3:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/9 "2017-10-29T15:53:00Z")

</div>

Both the new Support class MG’s are crap. The MG15 is far superior in either light or heavy role.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/marxistdictator/32/102751_2.png) [@MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MarxistDictator)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 3:57pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/10 "2017-10-29T15:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@plasticman883](#):
>
> Both the new Support class MG’s are crap. The MG15 is far superior in either light or heavy role.

So much wrong contained in one post

The Perino can fire 65 rounds without overheating and hits max accuracy at like bullet 3. How is that bad

The MG 14/17 has the TTK of an Autoloading 8 .35, only it has 100 rounds in a belt and the second highest infantry weapon rate of fire. Its a good thing it has insane recoil drift and it’s easily one of the best LMGs despite that drawback.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plasticman883](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/e95f7d/32.png) [@plasticman883](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/plasticman883)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 3:59pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/11 "2017-10-29T15:59:00Z")

</div>

There’s stats, and there’s real-time game play experience. They are both like pea-shooters with teensy, weensy mags with about 30 secs reload time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![woll3](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/woll3/32/104081_2.png) [@woll3](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/woll3)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 4:08pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/12 "2017-10-29T16:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@plasticman883](#):
>
> There’s stats, asperger’s man, and there’s real-time game play experience. They are both like pea-shooters with teensy, weensy mags with about 30 secs reload time.

Well, both require at least a little bit of aim to use them effectively.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronTheZombie](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/aaronthezombie/32/101126_2.png) [@AaronTheZombie](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AaronTheZombie)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 7:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/13 "2017-10-29T19:47:00Z")

</div>

> [@plasticman883](#):
>
> Both the new Support class MG’s are crap. The MG15 is far superior in either light or heavy role.

Surly you jest?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plasticman883](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/e95f7d/32.png) [@plasticman883](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/plasticman883)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 7:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/14 "2017-10-29T19:55:00Z")

</div>

Nope. The new ones are pea-shooters. When you lay down supressive with teh MG-15 you get far less back at you. IME.

#realvirtualworldtruths

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FocalCapybara34](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/e19b73/32.png) [@FocalCapybara34](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/FocalCapybara34)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2017, 7:07am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/15 "2017-10-30T07:07:00Z")

</div>

> [@plasticman883](#):
>
> Both the new Support class MG’s are crap. The MG15 is far superior in either light or heavy role.

Mg15 is only better at distance. The parabellum destroys multiple enemies faster at close to medium.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AduaneroKill](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/90db22/32.png) [@AduaneroKill](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AduaneroKill)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2017, 2:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/16 "2017-10-30T14:24:00Z")

</div>

I prefer my Madsen in all situations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wiazabi](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/85e7bf/32.png) [@wiazabi](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/wiazabi)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2017, 3:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/hellriegal-vs-parabellum-14-17/103257/17 "2017-10-30T15:03:00Z")

</div>

Hellriegel is easiest to use but Para is just down right op currently and it is great at all ranges close med and longrange with bipod, look up stats and ttk of weapons on symptic and you get an idea as to why certain weapons are well too good really.

Only downside to Para is recoil which you can deal with and the slow reload.
