# Historical inaccuracy VS Racism VS common sense

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/historical-inaccuracy-vs-racism-vs-common-sense/102633>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [November 4, 2016, 10:28am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/historical-inaccuracy-vs-racism-vs-common-sense/102633 "2016-11-04T10:28:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pan\_Kalich](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/pan_kalich/32/103070_2.png) [@Pan\_Kalich](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Pan_Kalich)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2016, 1:08pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/historical-inaccuracy-vs-racism-vs-common-sense/102633/61 "2016-11-04T13:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@REKT\_Prophet](#):
>
> Not everyone who disagrees with the DEVS choice is a nutter OR triggered or a racist. In-game I barely notice anything about the characters. I’m having too much fun. It’s the blatant pandering and “look world…we made the mostest diversest game ever!” attitude. It’s gag inducing. There was no need for it and it was NOT accidental.
> 
> Imagine if a dev made a game about African tribal wars and 50% of the soldiers were white? Or if “Shogun: Total War” had Australian soldier fighting in Japan? It’s just not historically accurate. That’s NOT to say this is a history lesson but this cringy grovelling is soooo not necessary.

Could not agree more. Thank you

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/historical-inaccuracy-vs-racism-vs-common-sense/102633.md?page=3)