# I get the feeling **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [May 12, 2016, 9:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183 "2016-05-12T09:19:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![HAGster1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hagster1969/32/1715_2.png) [@HAGster1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HAGster1969)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 9:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/1 "2016-05-12T09:19:00Z")
All the haters going on about, not enough weapons no this no that, WW1 wont have enough blah blah blah. That when its released and there is a full set of weapons and different maps and vehicles because Dice did there research and added little extra bits (maybe) not quite representive of WW1 to balance and give gamepay. They will then be the ones saying geeze Dice cant even do ww1 correct they put in this added that its op hate hate hate. Cant you just be glad you found a series of games you pay less than £100 for and get 2 years of enjoyment out of them each time. And dont come back with this is broken that is broken geeze what a rip off i paid x for this and get shot in the back etc etc. These games work out at a fraction of a penny for an hours fun over there lifetime, where eles can you get that? ---
**Author:** ![Red\_Spider](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ee59a6/32.png) [@Red\_Spider](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Red_Spider)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 9:25am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/2 "2016-05-12T09:25:00Z")
Considering practically nothing has really been confirmed about game content, I fail to see how people are making such assumptions about how little there is going to be in the game. If you’re basing your opinion of final game content on a _REVEAL_ trailer then your opinion is invalid, imo ---
**Author:** ![HAGster1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hagster1969/32/1715_2.png) [@HAGster1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HAGster1969)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 9:28am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/3 "2016-05-12T09:28:00Z")
> [@Red\_Spider](#): > > If you’re basing your opinion of final game content on a _REVEAL_ trailer then your opinion is invalid, imo agree all BF trailers have been cinematic but gameplay has always been great. ---
**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 9:39am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/4 "2016-05-12T09:39:00Z")
> [@Red\_Spider](#): > > Considering practically nothing has really been confirmed about game content, I fail to see how people are making such assumptions about how little there is going to be in the game. > > If you’re basing your opinion of final game content on a _REVEAL_ trailer then your opinion is invalid, imo I think it’s fair to speculate when its a known time period that is known to have a fair lack of diversity in weapons. ---
**Author:** ![Red\_Spider](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ee59a6/32.png) [@Red\_Spider](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Red_Spider)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 9:47am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/5 "2016-05-12T09:47:00Z")
> [@Sir-xer21](#): > > I think it’s fair to speculate when its a known time period that is known to have a fair lack of diversity in weapons. Sorry, I disagree. This was the age when big technological advancements were being made. Additionally, DICE have already said they will also include some “Prototype Weapons” to further add to diversity ---
**Author:** ![HAGster1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hagster1969/32/1715_2.png) [@HAGster1969](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HAGster1969)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 9:54am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/6 "2016-05-12T09:54:00Z")
> [@Sir-xer21](#): > > lack of diversity in weapons. Its statments like this that make me not even want to converse, but Ill make an exception. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons\_of\_World\_War\_I](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons_of_World_War_I) You will see there are enough weapons / vehicles to make easy 4 classes all with single shot / semi auto / full auto / explosives. ---
**Author:** ![AFROSRB](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/53a042/32.png) [@AFROSRB](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AFROSRB)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 10:21am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/7 "2016-05-12T10:21:00Z")
There is so much content possible for a WW1 Game regarding weapons, as well as for vehicles, rifles, grenades and so on. Just like you showed in the link. I’ve posted few days ago and thread about weapon list of WW1 with many links to Internet sites. You’ll be amazed to see how much it was. There is no reason at all to brag about content, foremost we haven’t seen the full game content yet. [Weapon List of WW1 (Multilingual)](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/weapon-list-of-ww1-multilingual/101034) ---
**Author:** ![Sahnegurke](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sahnegurke/32/103352_2.png) [@Sahnegurke](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sahnegurke)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 11:36am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/8 "2016-05-12T11:36:00Z")
They already said that weapons from the entire (also the end of the war) will be available, although most of the war, soldiers probably used repeaters only. ---
**Author:** ![DavTan](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/davtan/32/101656_2.png) [@DavTan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DavTan)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2016, 11:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-get-the-feeling/101183/9 "2016-05-12T11:52:00Z")
i would agree with the content of your op mr hagster