Why do you keep referencing 100 pages back when the comment was made 2-3 pages ago…
I think his post just went through twice one got hung up during approval. It’s no biggie. I don’t have issues with bad or really anyone TBH if they are willing to talk and leave all that extra stuff behind.
Ah my apologise then
Wow! 79 new responses to this thread in 24 hours?
I have meet the same aimbot cheater now 3 times. Only HS and his stats show it too.
Reported him 2 week ago along with many others. same with the next 2 times.
And still he plays. You lose confidence in the system when the obvious cheats are allowed to play.
Played last night against a suspicious person on Frontlines. Had a username of the format xxxxx11111 name and digits. A quick google of the name revealed a steam account of the same name, with a VAC ban. He said, “oh, that was in counterstrike, back when I was a kid.”
Because the point remains. Irrelevant of how far back it is. The majority of people in this thread are reasonable and measured. Can’t take the odd crazy notion and suggest it’s the norm in this thread. I think Peilly said it 2 pages back. Semantics whether 100 pages or 2.
It was a repeat message
So basically what you’re saying is don’t reply to a question or question someones logic on a said accusatio. No matter what page it’s on. Cool noted
Dude you have played with A LOT more than ONE dude. Game publishers need to be held accountable for all the cheating. I have never in my life seen it so bad as it is right now in BFV. Try playing a game of rush legit. It is . All this other blah blah blah is just that. If you think you are only playing with one or 2 cheaters a day you are either very uneducated/not very bright or are cheating yourself. There is absolutely no other explanation.
There is A LOT more Dice et al could do to combat cheating but they choose not to. You really have to ask yourself why.
We’re brothers from different mothers. Pelliy rarely talks about the state of the game. All he is concerned about is his perception of what other people are saying. He writes about “facts” and never explains what those facts are. That’s why in nearly every post I write, I suggest that everyone get on point and reinforce the “fact” that the anti-cheat in BF5 is terrible to non-existant (that’s a range btw) and that’s what we should be going mental about.. not all that other meta. It’s the extreme cognitive dissonance and constant thread derailing that’s annoying.
So.. that said.. EA/Dice are pathetic for not having effective anti-cheat in BF games. Not just BF5, but BF1, and BF4 before it. All of them have ineffective to no anti-cheat, and EA/Dice need to be held accountable for it. The way I’m going to hold them accountable is to not play their game, and not buy any new games. Sure, my lone boycott means nothing to them, but if we can get a large number of players to say that EA/Dice are not getting the job done and we’re boycotting, then maybe that will force them to take anti-cheat seriously. Anti-cheat isn’t the only problem in the game, but I cut slack for design problems. Those types of problems do not wreck matches. Cheaters can and do wreck a match… plus the inherit unfairness of paying to play a game that doesn’t have an even playing field. I did not pay for a game only to end up playing against cheaters… or I guess I did. No more.
Those are my basic “facts”. The anti-cheat is crap. I want the anti-cheat to be on the level of PUBG. I will not play or buy their games until it is. But I sure as hell will keep bumping up this thread, and I will keep back-handing the people trying to derail it.
It’s odd that you would write that to Red_Label_Scotch. He’s probably the best voice in this thread on the issue of cheating (besides me of course). He very well knows that it’s not just ONE dude. Red does talk about individual cheaters he’s come across, but that’s fine as far as I’m concerned. Anything to reinforce the point that the anti-cheat in the game is terrible is great… even a post describes a lone cheater. All good.
Maybe I’m in the wrong mode or region, but I haven’t seen a single rage cheater (stand in one spot racking up headshots with a LMG). I’ve seen blatant aimbots, a couple of damage mods, and mostly ESP users trying to fly under the radar. Someone should tell them just because their crosshair isn’t locked to anyone through a wall, doesn’t mean they aren’t obvious when they go sprinting towards an area where there’s no noise, no red dots, no signs of life, and they know right where a player is.
Can you show me when I suggested it was the norm? I was speaking on certain individuals. Individuals that are not about the conversation. How does that translate to the whole thread is full of nutjobs and wackos? Man, You’re really reaching dude. But ok.
We’ll disagree and move on.. Lets just talk about the anticheat.
It was a repeat message
You’re too angry to interact with. Angry man. I made my point. Now get angry Grrrrrrrrrrrr
If I was angry I would have left by now.
You made your point bravo I made mine also. Take as you will
Questionable stats?
Bookmarking this for when it doesn’t happen.
No question in my mind…lol. There were 2 clans of botters in the same server tonight… on the same team. I’ve seen both do this before.
Man, why is there no anti-cheat software/program in this game? Previous titles at least have primitive anti-cheat programs like Fair Play. Battlefield V is just a mess with a lackluster content, loads of bugs and glitches, and absolutely no control on hackers. DICE/EA deserves their poor sales figures for this title.