# I’m glad sweet spot is going but I’m worried about scout effectiveness

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-m-glad-sweet-spot-is-going-but-i-m-worried-about-scout-effectiveness/105720>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 19, 2018, 4:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-m-glad-sweet-spot-is-going-but-i-m-worried-about-scout-effectiveness/105720 "2018-06-19T16:52:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuN\_sLiNgErXD15](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/gun_slingerxd15/32/102144_2.png) [@GuN\_sLiNgErXD15](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GuN_sLiNgErXD15)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 2:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-m-glad-sweet-spot-is-going-but-i-m-worried-about-scout-effectiveness/105720/21 "2018-06-20T14:03:00Z")

</div>

The mechanism has been a non entity for me only once did I pick a ba for its sweet spot.  
I go for the same ba characteristics I always go for, high bullet velocity, rpm and accuracy recovery between shots.  
I also don’t thinks scouts in bf1 are any worse or better than in bf4 I will say there appears to be more? I could be wrong. But more equal more potatoes I guess.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/i-m-glad-sweet-spot-is-going-but-i-m-worried-about-scout-effectiveness/105720.md?page=1)