# Limpet Charge

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/limpet-charge/102977>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [April 20, 2017, 5:59am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/limpet-charge/102977 "2017-04-20T05:59:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hawcer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawcer/32/102178_2.png) [@hawcer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/hawcer)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2017, 5:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/limpet-charge/102977/21 "2017-04-20T17:21:00Z")

</div>

> [@von\_Campenstein](#):
>
> > [@Ram1c](#):
> >
> > > [@von\_Campenstein](#):
> > >
> > > Artillery trucks are too heavily armored, I’d have no problem with limpets being OHK if placed on the rear of the truck.
> > 
> > I think the rear is more armored, from my experience the engine bay is the most vulnerable part of the artillery truck. With my light tank it’s two shots, if I hit the rear armor plating it’s 3. I just wish we could carry two limpets at a time, I would be double sticking my way into the hall of fame.
> 
> Or why not double limpet as your gadgets?

I agree…if assault can carry two huge AT nades and 3 fairly large AT mines or TNT, support should get at least 2 limpets.  
Resupply doesn’t apply.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/limpet-charge/102977.md?page=1)