# List Of Guns We Could See

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [September 24, 2017, 7:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198 "2017-09-24T19:24:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yesman1035ktu](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/y/49beb7/32.png) [@Yesman1035ktu](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Yesman1035ktu)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 7:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/1 "2017-09-24T19:24:00Z")

</div>

Bergman-Bayard

Mauser Zig-Zag Revolver

Apache Revolver

MG 08/15 Light

 ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/7/e/7e8554195ba2bea3baead3d474105324f3f99435.jpeg)

Gast Gun (Could just be a singular version)

Thompson Annihilator SMG

Lewis Gun Air Model

 ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/c/e/ce115e53138af6b147c8309c0474489cad4dc42a.jpeg)

American Experimental SMG

 ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/e/b/eb276397948f611099d912e71b796ff855014cb0.png)

Burton 1917 LMR

Chau Chat Model 1918 (It had a 16 round curved detachable round magazine)

 ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/3/1/3166e8ecd61b6b115ba66b88b36b83c4e96ec3b2.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robmcewen](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/robmcewen/32/102169_2.png) [@robmcewen](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/robmcewen)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 7:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/2 "2017-09-24T19:44:00Z")

</div>

Nice list

That American Experimental SMG looks very strange. looks like the drum is made up of several pistol magazines. If it does work like that the animators would have some fun putting that in the game

I think the Gast Gun needs to stay as a twin-link machine gun cant see anything wrong running around with that. LOL

How would their make the Lewis Gun Air Model different from the other Lewis guns?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yesman1035ktu](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/y/49beb7/32.png) [@Yesman1035ktu](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Yesman1035ktu)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 7:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/3 "2017-09-24T19:53:00Z")

</div>

Lewis Air Model would get increased rate of fire with increased recoil as well as increased magazine size.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bl1tzTurk](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@Bl1tzTurk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Bl1tzTurk)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 8:00pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/4 "2017-09-24T20:00:00Z")

</div>

I wish i could see the Colt single action army in the game..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robmcewen](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/robmcewen/32/102169_2.png) [@robmcewen](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/robmcewen)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 8:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/5 "2017-09-24T20:12:00Z")

</div>

Found this video on youtube on the American Experimental SMG, looks like it would be hard to wield, looks like it could use a foregrip.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzwLUqUeKxE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzwLUqUeKxE)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f14d63/32.png) [@MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MegaloDorian)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 8:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/6 "2017-09-24T20:31:00Z")

</div>

The Andrews SMG seems to have index notches on the “turret” and has an arm that seems like it originally engaged said notches (probably eventually broke during testing or some other unknown circumstance). Your support hand seems like it’d rest on the shroud/foregrip. It also lacks any proper sights. As such, in-game, I say its spread model should work like an LMG’s, but as the polar opposite. The first shot would be inaccurate, to test where the gun is “pointing.” The second shot, however, will have a reverse spread value that’d make the said second shot considerably more accurate than the first. Then after that, the spread continues to increase again.

I still want a Sunngard to fill in the niche of a high capacity handgun.

 ![x2HK4c2.jpg](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/1/2/12d51c875e5860a11c4e5d4545da043643e930e4.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CS-2107](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/9e8a1a/32.png) [@CS-2107](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CS-2107)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 8:33pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/7 "2017-09-24T20:33:00Z")

</div>

I think the Farquar-Hill Rifle would also be a nice choice. We also miss the Ottoman-Mauser and the Carcano, which I suppose will be in the next DLC as that would be very fitting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tankgewehr1917/32/103697_2.png) [@TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TankGewehr1917)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 9:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/8 "2017-09-24T21:23:00Z")

</div>

Lewis air model is already in the game on the back of the Brisfit I believe, just like the Parabellum is on the German planes.

What about the Carcano and Berthier rifles? Also the MG08/15 light looks like a cross between the MG15 and Madsen and I doubt we’ll see it in the game. Also would love to see a 1917 Enfield rifle or a 1903 infantry. The Glisenti and Nambu pistols would be awesome as well.

If we do see Japan in Turning Tides I’d guarantee an Arisaka type 38 rifle too. I’d like to see the Farquhar-Hill appear in this expansion too for the assault class.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Officer\_Sloth](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/officer_sloth/32/103004_2.png) [@Officer\_Sloth](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Officer_Sloth)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 9:29pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/9 "2017-09-24T21:29:00Z")

</div>

I would love to see a Thompson Implemented into the game.

- Sloth

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tankgewehr1917/32/103697_2.png) [@TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TankGewehr1917)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2017, 9:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/10 "2017-09-24T21:42:00Z")

</div>

> [@Officer\_Sloth](#):
>
> I would love to see a Thompson Implemented into the game.
> 
> - Sloth

Even though they were due to be issued when the war ended, I’d say that this is one gun I _don’t_ want them to include. I feel it would be much more iconic as a WW2 weapon and would confuse a lot of people. Also it wouldn’t be the one we all know and love from the movies which was developed in the 20’s/30’s it would be the less refined, awkward prototype version that would disappoint people as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f14d63/32.png) [@MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MegaloDorian)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2017, 12:54am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/11 "2017-09-25T00:54:00Z")

</div>

> [@TankGewehr1917](#):
>
> I’d like to see the Farquhar-Hill appear in this expansion too for the assault class.

If the Farquhar-Hill were added, it’d be a Medic weapon. It really doesn’t have any qualities that’d make it fit into the Assault class.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChrisAshes](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chrisashes/32/101514_2.png) [@ChrisAshes](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ChrisAshes)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2017, 1:08am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/12 "2017-09-25T01:08:00Z")

</div>

i want the krag jørgensen

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dks01](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/e79b87/32.png) [@dks01](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/dks01)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2017, 1:24am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/13 "2017-09-25T01:24:00Z")

</div>

A nice add to the Sniper class would be the Canadian Ross rifle. Problem was it had to be kept clean, unlike the Lee Enfield. The bolt had a nasty habit of blowing back in the user’s face, killing or blinding them. But it was a best in class sniper rifle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tankgewehr1917/32/103697_2.png) [@TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TankGewehr1917)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2017, 11:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/14 "2017-10-04T23:09:00Z")

</div>

> [@dks01](#):
>
> A nice add to the Sniper class would be the Canadian Ross rifle. Problem was it had to be kept clean, unlike the Lee Enfield. The bolt had a nasty habit of blowing back in the user’s face, killing or blinding them. But it was a best in class sniper rifle.

Yeah the Mauser was pretty unreliable when covered in mud too but that’s still in the game. I think we might see the Ross in Apocalypse.

> [@MegaloDorian](#):
>
> > [@TankGewehr1917](#):
> >
> > I’d like to see the Farquhar-Hill appear in this expansion too for the assault class.
> 
> If the Farquhar-Hill were added, it’d be a Medic weapon. It really doesn’t have any qualities that’d make it fit into the Assault class.

Wasn’t there a fully auto version? Anyway if it does become a medic gun we could get a sweeper variant then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Temp1st](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/temp1st/32/103725_2.png) [@Temp1st](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Temp1st)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2017, 11:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/15 "2017-10-04T23:42:00Z")

</div>

Colt SAA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobsAndVegane](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/0ea827/32.png) [@BobsAndVegane](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BobsAndVegane)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2017, 11:51pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/16 "2017-10-04T23:51:00Z")

</div>

A nucular splody all-class weapon, please.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contra87](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/8dc957/32.png) [@Contra87](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Contra87)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2017, 12:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/17 "2017-10-05T00:33:00Z")

</div>

Le Matte revolver. I know it’s out dated by WWI, but this is the only game I have a shot at using one.

(If you don’t want to google it, think 9 shot Gasser with a 20 gauge shotgun)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f14d63/32.png) [@MegaloDorian](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MegaloDorian)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2017, 6:53am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/18 "2017-10-05T06:53:00Z")

</div>

> [@TankGewehr1917](#):
>
> Wasn’t there a fully auto version? Anyway if it does become a medic gun we could get a sweeper variant then.

The so-called “automatic variant” was the Beardmore-Farquhar machine gun, a relatively different design that was designed post-Armistice. The Farquhar-Hill rifle was only semi-automatic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlotOfThunder](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/alotofthunder/32/101184_2.png) [@AlotOfThunder](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AlotOfThunder)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2017, 9:08am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/19 "2017-10-05T09:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@Contra87](#):
>
> Le Matte revolver. I know it’s out dated by WWI, but this is the only game I have a shot at using one.
> 
> (If you don’t want to google it, think 9 shot Gasser with a 20 gauge shotgun)

you can use it in red dead redemption halfway in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tankgewehr1917/32/103697_2.png) [@TankGewehr1917](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TankGewehr1917)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2017, 6:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198/20 "2017-10-06T06:46:00Z")

</div>

> [@MegaloDorian](#):
>
> > [@TankGewehr1917](#):
> >
> > Wasn’t there a fully auto version? Anyway if it does become a medic gun we could get a sweeper variant then.
> 
> The so-called “automatic variant” was the Beardmore-Farquhar machine gun, a relatively different design that was designed post-Armistice. The Farquhar-Hill rifle was only semi-automatic.

Thanks for clearing that up.

I’d also like to see the Kjellman make it in. Like carrying around a portable Vickers.

 ![](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/3/8/389906b6f2c918f5b50c581500a667ecbba54cb2.jpeg)

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/list-of-guns-we-could-see/103198.md?page=2)
