# Little early but Battlefield 6 vietnam ??

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055>\
**Category:** Off-Topic\
**Created:** [January 25, 2019, 10:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055 "2019-01-25T10:33:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kattegat\_Twin](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kattegat_twin/32/102472_2.png) [@Kattegat\_Twin](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Kattegat_Twin)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2019, 9:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/41 "2019-01-25T21:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@ackers75](#):
>
> A more futuristic setting would be nice like 2142

Eww, no. Please no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skippylarue](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/skippylarue/32/103510_2.png) [@skippylarue](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/skippylarue)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2019, 9:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/42 "2019-01-25T21:54:00Z")

</div>

As many have suggested, a Cold-War era Battlefield game would be a great setting. Specifically, the 60’s and 70’s. A lot of fairly iconic weapons came into being in that time period. It would satisfy a lot of people who want a modern Battlefield title, and would allow for nearly any setting which is something BF:Vietnam would not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![warslag](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/warslag/32/101053_2.png) [@warslag](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/warslag)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2019, 10:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/43 "2019-01-25T22:22:00Z")

</div>

#BattleCoD6 the prequel sequel remake world war 4 all over again

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B4ckdoorAssassin](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b4ckdoorassassin/32/106488_2.png) [@B4ckdoorAssassin](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B4ckdoorAssassin)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2019, 11:16pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/44 "2019-01-25T23:16:00Z")

</div>

> [@gibonez](#):
>
> > [@BiscoMix07](#):
> >
> > God no, I hope they return to modern.
> 
> Not going to happen. You will not see any modern EA shooters atleast any time soon.

What do you mean by any time soon? As in the next game in the series won’t be modern or that a new game won’t be coming out for years?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HawkeyeAM47](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawkeyeam47/32/102180_2.png) [@HawkeyeAM47](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HawkeyeAM47)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2019, 11:28pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/45 "2019-01-25T23:28:00Z")

</div>

The futureistic setting of Battlefield was Battlefront  
ALso, The Next battlefield should be set in the cold war era, spanning from the 50’s to the 80’s . Why so long? Its simple, implement, battles from Korean war (Never been done in a FPS game) , tgen you have Nam, you have Rhodesia, South American Drug wars(Yes US was involved in conflicta in SOuth AMerica) Then yiu have the bay of pigs, Plenty African conflicts, then you have the Iraq war of 1989-1991, then tge most important, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The weapons and gadgets of the era, arent to crazy like Battlefield 4

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DCSTomcat](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dcstomcat/32/101664_2.png) [@DCSTomcat](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DCSTomcat)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2019, 2:56am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/46 "2019-01-26T02:56:00Z")

</div>

> [@SirTerrible](#):
>
> > [@DCSTomcat](#):
> >
> > > [@ackers75](#):
> > >
> > > A more futuristic setting would be nice like 2142
> > 
> > Only if they bring back Titan mode otherwise no.
> > 
> > Modern and Vietnam, really isn’t much different, both have jets, and helis, but Nam has better music.
> 
> It’s ridiculous how much the music added to Vietnam lol. It made a good game great.

Yeah, being able to turn on radio and select from a list music tracks to listen to in any vehicles was one of the things I really liked in BF Vietnam 2004.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tovarisch\_Maxim](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tovarisch_maxim/32/108697_2.png) [@Tovarisch\_Maxim](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Tovarisch_Maxim)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2019, 2:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/47 "2019-01-26T14:21:00Z")

</div>

Not sure what would be epic about vietnam. You’re literaly limited to only one country for maps, and most of the maps will be jungles jungles and jungles. I also vote for Modern warfare since it opens up for a great variety of maps with their own setting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gibonez](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/gibonez/32/106712_2.png) [@gibonez](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/gibonez)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2019, 2:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/48 "2019-01-26T14:25:00Z")

</div>

> [@BiscoMix07](#):
>
> > [@gibonez](#):
> >
> > > [@BiscoMix07](#):
> > >
> > > God no, I hope they return to modern.
> > 
> > Not going to happen. You will not see any modern EA shooters atleast any time soon.
> 
> What do you mean by any time soon? As in the next game in the series won’t be modern or that a new game won’t be coming out for years?

Meaning EA wants to avoid having to license modern firearms, vehicles etc due to previously losing lawsuits and having to pay the companies unknown sums of money.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CRAZY\_EVAN1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/73ab20/32.png) [@CRAZY\_EVAN1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CRAZY_EVAN1)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2019, 4:51am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/49 "2019-01-30T04:51:00Z")

</div>

battlefield: war on terrorism. oh, it is gaming gold. let me know when you want my bank account number for deposit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BSPlissken](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bsplissken/32/106527_2.png) [@BSPlissken](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BSPlissken)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2019, 3:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/50 "2019-01-30T15:01:00Z")

</div>

IMO, if EA lost the Starwars BF IP (Because they are killing any SW game that any of their devs make) I think it would give them a good push to remake BF2142 or maybe hybridize BF perhaps with some NPCs like in Battlefront (original) to make bigger and grander battles.

I think that would be really amazing to see 64 players and 64-128 NPCs in larger maps. Constant shooting, tank fights and air combat. Really put the scale of combat into a game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RevolverOcelot14](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/revolverocelot14/32/108352_2.png) [@RevolverOcelot14](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RevolverOcelot14)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2019, 3:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/51 "2019-01-30T15:07:00Z")

</div>

Bad Company prequel set in Vietnam; Best idea ever

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CptDuffy](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ed655f/32.png) [@CptDuffy](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CptDuffy)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2019, 9:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/52 "2019-02-01T09:33:00Z")

</div>

> [@WHISPonPCin480P](#):
>
> Fairly certain anything but modern would wreck the franchise and DICE knows that.

No mate it wouldn’t and I don’t think they do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CptDuffy](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ed655f/32.png) [@CptDuffy](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CptDuffy)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2019, 10:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/53 "2019-02-01T10:17:00Z")

</div>

I’d be keen for the Cold War iteration as it’s been said it covers many wars and many locations. That could be a game that if done right would benefit from a live service

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alienstout](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/alienstout/32/101179_2.png) [@alienstout](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/alienstout)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2019, 2:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/54 "2019-02-01T14:49:00Z")

</div>

> [@RevolverOcelot14](#):
>
> Bad Company prequel set in Vietnam; Best idea ever

Dare I say… Korea!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![most\_strangerous](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/most_strangerous/32/108652_2.png) [@most\_strangerous](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/most_strangerous)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2019, 9:11am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/55 "2019-03-06T09:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@HawkeyeAM47](#):
>
> The futureistic setting of Battlefield was Battlefront  
> ALso, The Next battlefield should be set in the cold war era, spanning from the 50’s to the 80’s . Why so long? Its simple, implement, battles from Korean war (Never been done in a FPS game) , tgen you have Nam, you have Rhodesia, South American Drug wars(Yes US was involved in conflicta in SOuth AMerica) Then yiu have the bay of pigs, Plenty African conflicts, then you have the Iraq war of 1989-1991, then tge most important, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The weapons and gadgets of the era, arent to crazy like Battlefield 4

Wake up, what absolute pure uncontaminated rubbish

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HawkeyeAM47](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawkeyeam47/32/102180_2.png) [@HawkeyeAM47](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HawkeyeAM47)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2019, 6:32am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/56 "2019-03-07T06:32:00Z")

</div>

> [@most\_strangerous](#):
>
> > [@HawkeyeAM47](#):
> >
> > The futureistic setting of Battlefield was Battlefront  
> > ALso, The Next battlefield should be set in the cold war era, spanning from the 50’s to the 80’s . Why so long? Its simple, implement, battles from Korean war (Never been done in a FPS game) , tgen you have Nam, you have Rhodesia, South American Drug wars(Yes US was involved in conflicta in SOuth AMerica) Then yiu have the bay of pigs, Plenty African conflicts, then you have the Iraq war of 1989-1991, then tge most important, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The weapons and gadgets of the era, arent to crazy like Battlefield 4
> 
> Wake up, what absolute pure uncontaminated rubbish

What? How is that rubbish!?  
Dude the world was at war, with tons of Mercanaries, and covert operations against the USSR, you had Vietnam, Korea, Rhodesia/South Africa, Cuban Missle crissis/Bay Of Pigs, South America/ Panama/Columbia, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.  
Cod Black Ops 1 covered alot if the Cold war, and people loved it, we need more of that cold war era, and the stories from the time as the reflect alot of our world today

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhiskySanchez](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/8797f3/32.png) [@WhiskySanchez](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/WhiskySanchez)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2019, 1:15am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/57 "2019-03-11T01:15:00Z")

</div>

I’ll poop my pants in protest if BF6 is another trash period piece… No Vietman, no Korea, no Battle of 1812… MODERN.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HawkeyeAM47](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawkeyeam47/32/102180_2.png) [@HawkeyeAM47](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HawkeyeAM47)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2019, 1:51am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/58 "2019-03-11T01:51:00Z")

</div>

> [@WhiskySanchez](#):
>
> I’ll poop my pants in protest if BF6 is another trash period piece… No Vietman, no Korea, no Battle of 1812… MODERN.

At this point it probably will be a futuristic, modern type game.  
But, I feel a cold war gane would be amazing, its modern, but not to crazg with technology like todays soldiers, but not to far behind like soldiers from WW2 either.  
Have and wait and see

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gendonz36](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/gendonz36/32/108613_2.png) [@Gendonz36](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Gendonz36)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2019, 2:00pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/59 "2019-03-14T14:00:00Z")

</div>

Just make battlefield 4 with modern engine and graphic pls ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ENKkii87](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/enkkii87/32/101864_2.png) [@ENKkii87](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ENKkii87)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2019, 2:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055/60 "2019-03-14T14:02:00Z")

</div>

Let’s have BF BC

Cavemen tribe wars. Imagine the plethora of content! There’d be loads I promise.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/little-early-but-battlefield-6-vietnam/109055.md?page=4)
