# My feedback on the new Forums.

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847>\
**Category:** Off-Topic\
**Created:** [May 12, 2016, 5:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847 "2016-05-12T17:53:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mord-Vi](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mord-vi/32/102849_2.png) [@Mord-Vi](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Mord-Vi)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 8:33pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/301 "2016-06-19T20:33:00Z")

</div>

^ I’m at a loss as to why they’ve made the decision to do this. Have they given a reason, a basic reason as to WHY the forums had to be changed, and essentially reset to forums version 1.01 with essentially no crossover functionality to profiles? WHY is Battlefield 1 being made OUTSIDE of battlelog, anyway?

Is it confirmed that battlelog is being abandoned?

This is all so odd and daft.

Honestly, it concerns me a great deal about the state of battlefield 1 if this is their idea of ‘new forums’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mord-Vi](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mord-vi/32/102849_2.png) [@Mord-Vi](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Mord-Vi)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 8:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/302 "2016-06-19T20:34:00Z")

</div>

I pressed f5 to reset the page and it posted my comment again.  
It’s like the forums we’re trying to make my point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CyberDyme](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@CyberDyme](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CyberDyme)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 8:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/303 "2016-06-19T20:55:00Z")

</div>

Why is this thread hidden away in the off-topic area???  
Mods, please stick it on the front page until you have fixed all bugs in the Forum code.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robust\_Doughnut](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/robust_doughnut/32/103286_2.png) [@Robust\_Doughnut](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Robust_Doughnut)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 8:55pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/304 "2016-06-19T20:55:00Z")

</div>

> [@Mord-Vi](#):
>
> I pressed f5 to reset the page and it posted my comment again.  
> It’s like the forums we’re trying to make my point.

Lol.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ADefianceDuck](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/adefianceduck/32/101141_2.png) [@ADefianceDuck](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ADefianceDuck)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 9:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/305 "2016-06-19T21:05:00Z")

</div>

> [@Mord-Vi](#):
>
> ^ I’m at a loss as to why they’ve made the decision to do this. Have they given a reason, a basic reason as to WHY the forums had to be changed, and essentially reset to forums version 1.01 with essentially no crossover functionality to profiles? WHY is Battlefield 1 being made OUTSIDE of battlelog, anyway?
> 
> Is it confirmed that battlelog is being abandoned?
> 
> This is all so odd and daft.

I have it from a reputable source that battlelog will not be used for BF1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CyberDyme](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@CyberDyme](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CyberDyme)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 9:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/306 "2016-06-19T21:22:00Z")

</div>

> [@ADefianceDuck](#):
>
> > [@Mord-Vi](#):
> >
> > ^ I’m at a loss as to why they’ve made the decision to do this. Have they given a reason, a basic reason as to WHY the forums had to be changed, and essentially reset to forums version 1.01 with essentially no crossover functionality to profiles? WHY is Battlefield 1 being made OUTSIDE of battlelog, anyway?
> > 
> > Is it confirmed that battlelog is being abandoned?
> > 
> > This is all so odd and daft.
> 
> I have it from a reputable source that battlelog will not be used for BF1

There was no Internet, iPad, tablet PCs etc during WW1.  
So no battlelog, battle screen or similar for the game.

Actually probably a sinister business decision, as EA/DICE learned the hard way how many resources it truly takes to support a web-app across multiple platforms and keep it up to date as those platforms frequently release OS/browser updates as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mckrackin5324](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mckrackin5324/32/102776_2.png) [@mckrackin5324](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mckrackin5324)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 10:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/307 "2016-06-19T22:31:00Z")

</div>

> [@CyberDyme](#):
>
> Why is this thread hidden away in the off-topic area???  
> Mods, please stick it on the front page until you have fixed all bugs in the Forum code.

Seriously.

Funny that they’re trying to kill BF4 before BF1 even releases. Maybe the fear of it flopping like their last few projects has made them want to kill the competition in their own house…sounds stupid and also very EA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mckrackin5324](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mckrackin5324/32/102776_2.png) [@mckrackin5324](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mckrackin5324)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 10:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/308 "2016-06-19T22:35:00Z")

</div>

Why do I have to scroll back to the top to click back into the topic list? Why? Breadcrumbs was one of the best things they had going…DON’T say anything about that arrow at the bottom right!..doesn’t even appear unless the conditions are right.

Why is Battlefeed so broken now? You KNEW they were tied together. So you just basically flipped the players a big bird. “we’re killing the forums and you guys that use Battlefeed can suck it”.

Why is the edit box two lines?

I swear to Christ…I’ll just grab a free forum from Proboards and just lead a mass exodus to a better forum put together by drunks and kids.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cryphisss](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/977dab/32.png) [@Cryphisss](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Cryphisss)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 11:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/309 "2016-06-19T23:09:00Z")

</div>

@mckrackin5324 what do you mean when the conditions are right? I have never had any issue with the arrow being displayed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WognaTheNoob](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/bcef8e/32.png) [@WognaTheNoob](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/WognaTheNoob)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 11:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/310 "2016-06-19T23:25:00Z")

</div>

> [@CyberDyme](#):
>
> > [@DevilsBathtub](#):
> >
> > > [@No1StingerUserUK](#):
> > >
> > > > [@TonkTooStronk](#):
> > > >
> > > > Honestly it was a bad move to change the forums so drastically.
> > > 
> > > I am enjoying the extra life this has breathed into the forums but you’ve got to ask how long it will last and also what amount of that is coincidental and really down to BF1…
> > > 
> > > Ultimately I think they should have kept the forums located at [http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/](http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/) and just added new features. Honestly, there’s nothing these forums do which the structure of the old ones would have restricted.
> > > 
> > > At the very least they should have finished this site before releasing it instead of doing what is essentially an Open Beta.
> > 
> > i suppose its better to have people using it, so they can spot problems and get feedback
> 
> Even basic ‘in-house’ testing would have found the majority of issues we have highlighted here the first couple of days. You simple do not just do some coding and then drop it into public abuse, without first at least having made all basics work and assure the UI is intuitive for the majority of your ‘in-house’ testers to use/navigate.
> 
> Next to this, there is a ton of toolboxes/source code available on well tested forum frameworks. Drop it onto your webserver and you are off to a solid start. With functionality available way beyond what this ‘new’ forum is showing and features also to enable user specific preferences etc.
> 
> If this Forum is a sign of what to expect from BF1 and the place to discuss all the cool things about that new game, then the sales will never take off. Sorry for all the people I am sure have spent well-meant time coding/improving this forum. It is simply just bad and embarrassing.  
> Many of your inline scripts does not work when clicking the function buttons…  
> Did you try and click (re-)EDIT on a post longer than 3 lines? No, because then you would discover only 2 lines are visible in the text editor then. Etc etc etc. Damn man. Sorry. EA is too big a company with too many good coders to let such stuff slip out.
> 
> And then on top, switching off the old Forum while this new one is still in such poor shape.  
> Who took such a decision and why??? Truly mindboggling…

Couldn’t have said it better. truly disgusting and really throwing me off if regards to my expectations of BF1. Seems like EA keeps doing decisions like this so they definitely get worst comany in the us/world the 3rd time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VileStrife](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/65b543/32.png) [@VileStrife](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/VileStrife)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 12:21am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/311 "2016-06-20T00:21:00Z")

</div>

Well, I can say I don’t care for how the forum is setup now. It’s pretty much made it off my list of places to visit to see what is going on. So is this a sign that we doing away with Battlelog all together for future games? I surely hope so. But… This is horrible, just horrible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TonkTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tonktoostronk/32/103866_2.png) [@TonkTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TonkTooStronk)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 12:39am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/312 "2016-06-20T00:39:00Z")

</div>

Seriously, why are we going back to square one with this? Why are you drastically changing a working system?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iPLAYnFOURkay](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/iplaynfourkay/32/102316_2.png) [@iPLAYnFOURkay](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iPLAYnFOURkay)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 12:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/313 "2016-06-20T00:52:00Z")

</div>

Probably because the prior piece of system was such a pain in the to moderate.

I’m personally liking the new forums. Sure it could use a upgrade to design & layout + add in the Origin friends list and group chat, but other than that it’s feature rich compared to the Battlelog forums.

Have you guys even tried using the BBCode yet? there’s so much you can do now  
You can post images & vids directly on the forum without needing better battlelog, you can pop out this text box into a full screen (the arrows in the top right corner of the reply box), and there’s emojis.

Give it some time, this thing is going to be great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maddayz](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/3bc359/32.png) [@Maddayz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Maddayz)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 12:56am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/314 "2016-06-20T00:56:00Z")

</div>

> [@iPLAYnFOURkay](#):
>
> Give it some time, this thing is going to be great.

Sure but in the meantime, i’m forced to use an extension that inverts the colors just to be able to browse it…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stinky\_herbs](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/stinky_herbs/32/103621_2.png) [@stinky\_herbs](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/stinky_herbs)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 1:07am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/315 "2016-06-20T01:07:00Z")

</div>

wherez the rainy background? ;\_; i cannot battlelog w/out it.

hurry, dice pls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iPLAYnFOURkay](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/iplaynfourkay/32/102316_2.png) [@iPLAYnFOURkay](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iPLAYnFOURkay)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 1:16am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/316 "2016-06-20T01:16:00Z")

</div>

> [@Maddayz](#):
>
> > [@iPLAYnFOURkay](#):
> >
> > Give it some time, this thing is going to be great.
> 
> Sure but in the meantime, i’m forced to use an extension that inverts the colors just to be able to browse it…

To each his own I guess. I actually prefer the darker background, and (for once) text isn’t so small that I have to magnify my browser just to read it in 4k.

> [@stinky-\_\_\_-herbs](#):
>
> wherez the rainy background? ;\_; i cannot battlelog w/out it.
> 
> hurry, dice pls.

I hope the animated backgrounds stay with the Battlelog forums. It’s a waste of hardware resources for doing something as simple as browsing, and really can bog down the Steam overlay browser.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/278dde/32.png) [@Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Vespervin1)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 1:26am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/317 "2016-06-20T01:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@iPLAYnFOURkay](#):
>
> I hope the animated backgrounds stay with the Battlelog forums. It’s a waste of hardware resources for doing something as simple as browsing, and really can bog down the Steam overlay browser.

Too bad there wasn’t an option to turn the animation off, for those who didn’t like it.

Oh wait…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stinky\_herbs](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/stinky_herbs/32/103621_2.png) [@stinky\_herbs](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/stinky_herbs)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 1:29am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/318 "2016-06-20T01:29:00Z")

</div>

> [@iPLAYnFOURkay](#):
>
> > [@stinky-\_\_\_-herbs](#):
> >
> > wherez the rainy background? ;\_; i cannot battlelog w/out it.
> > 
> > hurry, dice pls.
> 
> I hope the animated backgrounds stay with the Battlelog forums. It’s a waste of hardware resources for doing something as simple as browsing, and really can bog down the Steam overlay browser.

no1 cares about ur hope.

Bring the rain!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TonkTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tonktoostronk/32/103866_2.png) [@TonkTooStronk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TonkTooStronk)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 1:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/319 "2016-06-20T01:46:00Z")

</div>

> [@iPLAYnFOURkay](#):
>
> Probably because the prior piece of system was such a pain in the to moderate.
> 
> I’m personally liking the new forums. Sure it could use a upgrade to design & layout + add in the Origin friends list and group chat, but other than that it’s feature rich compared to the Battlelog forums.
> 
> Have you guys even tried using the BBCode yet? there’s so much you can do now  
> You can post images & vids directly on the forum without needing better battlelog, you can pop out this text box into a full screen (the arrows in the top right corner of the reply box), and there’s emojis.
> 
> Give it some time, this thing is going to be great.

The issues aren’t with what we can do here, the issue is the gross layout and disconnection with Battlelog. A system that worked well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iPLAYnFOURkay](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/iplaynfourkay/32/102316_2.png) [@iPLAYnFOURkay](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/iPLAYnFOURkay)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2016, 1:58am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847/320 "2016-06-20T01:58:00Z")

</div>

> [@TonkTooStronk](#):
>
> The issues aren’t with what we can do here, the issue is the gross layout and disconnection with Battlelog. A system that worked well.

Layout can easily be changed as soon as they have a plan for implementation. Battlelog, for the time being, can be run in another tab.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847.md?page=15)

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/my-feedback-on-the-new-forums/108847.md?page=17)
