Carbonic:
llPhantom_Limbll:
Here is the thing: while all SP stories are obviously unreal even if some based on real events, Dice tried so hard to make them serious and meaningful. Which is a bad move considering the game has almost nothing to do with IRL events and stuff. Well at least the story of british guy was fun and had BF feeling to it because of being silly and over the top.
War stories in BF1 also had fun stuff and crazy stuff in them. But here Dice decided to make some points and failed to achieve the goal.
Well it’s not like the whole game was a success, overall mediocre SP is a part of a mediocre game and it perfectly fits.
I read your response as you don’t think these gritty, serious and meaningful campaigns without humor fit with this Battlefield as a game.
Quite interesting as that means you don’t like it for quite different reasons than the Original poster (OP).
That means you are on opposite sides of this very simplified spectrum:
OP - - - -realistic, meaningful, IRL - - - - Battlefield V - - - - humorous, arcadeish, fake world - - - - @llPhantom_Limbll
I wonder if this means Battlefield campaigns taking place in famous historical contexts are always doomed to fail when it comes to social media and forums as you will always either:
A: Annoy ½ the playerbase, the Bad Company crowd that think it’s too realistic, true to real life an meaningful = not fun enough
B: Annoy ½ the playerbase, The Hardcore crowd who think it’s too gimmicky, arcady, and fake = not authentic enough
C: Have the entire playerbase think it’s mediocre by trying to strike a balance between the two
Sure thing. For me games are for fun purposes. If I want to know more about real side of WW2 events, I’d rather watch some documentary. Games should never go full serious mode as it ruins fun and enjoyment. That’s why games like Wolfenstein series are good but BFV SP is mediocre at best.
And honestly, BFV overall is mediocre because Dice tried too hard to please everyone and in the end pleased nobody.