People are entitled to opinions and are able to like the game. I have no real quarrel with the game, it’s alright for a ww1 setting. My issue is with DICE’s handling of the multiplayer and the community. I’m a team player but no one I have ever played with that wasn’t a friend is and that is what pisses me off
Amen. I went back to BF3 & BF4. I even played several hours of Bad Company the other night. My lord that is still a killer game. Hands down it beats BF1 any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
I’ve stopped playing and moved on to other games. I’ll play when the next patch rolls out and give it another shot.
I was hopeful for BF4, meh, I was hopeful for BF1, Meh… Now I’m hopeful for Battlefield Competitive next year.
Dice is like that crazy person you once had a relationship with once in your life, At the beginning they are great (BF3) then they said it will be magical (BF4) then you follow the chicken feed getting what ever you can before you admit its over (BF1) and then you give it once last chance before it’s time to move on (Battlefield Competitive).
Another one of these it’s been too casuallized folks. If you run around hipfiring in anything but a shotgun you are an idiot. Secondly, the hero characters don’t provide you easy free kills unless the enemy team is mentally challenged and let you go unchecked. There were plenty of explosive spamming in bf4 and 3 except now we no longer have wire guided launchers and 5 rpg rounds at your disposal. You can’t run around like your lmg is an assault rifle anymore. The only thing I can really agree with you here is on the behemoths. But then again didn’t bf4 have the ac130?
This is such a hysterical criticism. The sweet-spot mechanic in BF1 wrecked games that do not even have the sweet-spot mechanic? Huh???
It’s also just a generally silly point because sweet-spot hits are not actually that common. As people have complained about after the change to the Martini-Henry, even when you are within the sweet-spot range, you don’t get the one-hit-kill if you hit the person’s arms. Considering that the arms take up a lot of peoples’ sides and a good bit of the front torso area, 100 damage body shots from bolt-actions aren’t even THAT common. It doesn’t have some giant effect on gameplay, so I find it difficult to understand how it could have “ruined” the game for you, let alone ruined other games as well.
To the extent that you are objecting to the fact that it’s not realistic, gameplay is more important than realism. How guns operate in games is always fairly unrealistic. Consider, for instance, that your muzzle velocity in BF4 went down when you were suppressed. Was that remotely realistic? No. Nor was the fact that, even when not suppressed, your muzzle velocity in that game was way lower than the actual guns’ muzzle velocities are in real life. Choices like this are made for gameplay purposes. And the sweet-spot mechanic is a good way of differentiating between different bolt-action rifles and making weapons more effective at their intended range while not making them OP at other ranges.
I love the gameplay but it feels unfinished in every other way.
Examples.
1.Server browser.
2.Lack of content and achievements.
3.Dogtags suck.
4.Platoons/ clan tags
5.Career page and this forum is inferior to old battlelog.
I would love to find real servers easyer with less horrible players…
I’m just gonna say that I don’t like how casual it is.
Before you all say that it is not casual here is why I say it is: I am not a good player, i suck most of the time and yet, without trying, I am tipping the leaderboard on my team more often than not ( I have to literally do nothing but long range snipe to come lower). This shouldn’t happen! If I go on BF4 I’m near middle on the board and that feels correct but to top the board? Really? Without trying? It just doesn’t seem right to me
Perhaps it’s simply because you’re experienced at Battlefield games. There’s a lot of knowledge and understanding that is helpful across all Battlefield games, so it undoubtedly helps in racking up points to have experience with prior BF games. Battlefield 4 is three years old. At this point, everyone who is still playing BF4 is experienced with Battlefield games, because, at the very least, they’ve clearly been playing BF4 for quite a while. In contrast, there are plenty of people playing BF1 who are not yet experienced in Battlefield games, since this might be their first one and the game has only been out a few months. A mediocre player who nevertheless has a strong knowledge of how Battlefield games work will be able to outscore those players. When BF1 is three years old, it’ll be a lot tougher to top the leaderboard there too.
If you haven’t tried Standard Issue Rifles game mode, you really should. It’s surprisingly more fun than it sounds, and it gives you more of that WWI feeling than the core BF1 game. There are normal & hardcore custom servers, try them both, just search for “standard” in the server browser.
For a lot of people that have tried my server, they’ve said they were going to stop playing BF1 until they found the standard issue rifles hc servers. So, just saying, if you’re bored of the game or find the core game lacking, or just don’t quite feel there’s enough of World War 1 feeling, give standard issue rifles a try.
Starting to hate it… hate battlefront and this is turning into the game.
I’ve played nearly all battlefield games, on psn and lately Xbox and loved all of them..
I really don’t like the destroyer, blimp and armoured train, hardly ever changes anything, and it’s cheap spamming that crap at a side which earned victory.