# People crying over Assault Prowess

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/people-crying-over-assault-prowess/106232>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [December 21, 2018, 9:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/people-crying-over-assault-prowess/106232 "2018-12-21T09:38:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/hawxxeye/32/101036_2.png) [@Hawxxeye](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Hawxxeye)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2018, 12:48pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/people-crying-over-assault-prowess/106232/21 "2018-12-21T12:48:00Z")

</div>

> [@JamieCurnock](#):
>
> > [@naitch44](#):
> >
> > The main issue with assault is there is no reason to play any other class.
> > 
> > Recon - limited play style  
> > Medic - frustrating  
> > Support - why? Unless you just want to lie there. Drilling is at least fun though…
> > 
> > Assault has weapons that rule at pretty much every range, versatility to combat vehicles etc. Thats the problem, the other classes aren’t viable enough compared to assault. Support being the only other class to get remotely close…
> 
> Love support class. Fg42 is a beast for aggressive objective play. The bren, Lewis and ke7 can be used in the same way and none of these guns need to be prone to use, unless your recoil handling is all over the place.
> 
> Also I take on tanks with the at pistol and a ammo crate to restock with so yes you can take on tanks.
> 
> Totally agree regarding medic tho, they suck at the moment.

off topic, but what sights do you use the most?

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/people-crying-over-assault-prowess/106232.md?page=1)