Of course it is. Different team or not, EA is paying to have Firestorm developed when they should be fixing an existing product.
It might make economic sense, but it is still a slap in the face to Battlefield players for them to be developing a game mode that is so different it doesn’t target their wants or needs instead of addressing the many many bad issues in the product they just gave them.
Companies are in the business of making money? Sure. But some like to do it by delivering great products and keeping customers happy. Others will happily shaft their existing customers to chase new ones. If EA want to be the latter shrug that’s up to them, but it doesn’t stop Battlefield fans from being rightfully peed off.
It’s a strange length you went to assume that, because I disagreed with the very notion of your stupid poll, that it somehow meant I was angry that people voted in one direction, and that I really wanted to play BR.
It’s also strange that you say you wanted to get the opinions of your peers, but yet you tried to turn it into a numbers game benefiting you with votes.
All in all, I have to ask, do you suffer from a severe learning disability? Do you suffer from some form of brain damage? Generally curious here, because good god was your reply baseless, stupid, and baselessly-stupid.
how can u call a BR game competitive?
u need luck for loot and on top u need even more luck to loot “epic” weapons…
it’s like saying u need skill to loot the best epic gun
it would be way more competitive if u just could select ur loadout
It’s competitive in the sense that you need to make the best of whatever you’re carrying at any given moment, until you can find something better. In PUBG, it is very satisfying to kill someone with a handgun, and steal his lovely specced up AR/Sniper rifle or whatever he has. The person with the “best” gear does not automatically come out on top. You need to be good at stealth, know the map, and know how to deal with whatever your enemies are throwing at you.
Nobody says you need skill to loot a gun. Why did you pull that out of your behind?
because if 2 good players (same skill level, same reaction time, same map knowledge) meet and one of them was lucky to loot the same gun but on “epic” tell me who will win that gunfight and why?
i accept ur opinion it’s okay but…
for me and i know not just for me “competitive” means that there is NO (or lets say not an intended) luck factor
ah and yea nobody said looting a better gun is skill… i just said calling a BR game with loot competitve is like saying u need skill to drop a better weapon
But if u got 2 good players (same skill level, same reaction time, same map knowledge) and one of them was lucky to loot the same weapon but on “epic” and than they meet, who will win this gunfight and why?
u also could think about player 1 was looting his favorite gun and player 2 didn’t… where is the competition if they are at same skill level?
i accept ur opinion it’s okay
but for me and for many others i know “competitive” means that there is NO (or lets say not an intended) luck part…
I don’t want Battle Royale mode for these reasons:
1.) The round victory is determined by your luck in looting the best weapons and armor → luck based game mode
2.) You shouldn’t be able to earn vehicles because it’s just dumb and puts other players in disadvantage
3.) You shouldn’t be able to see everyone while launching the round durring the paraschute phase because it’s dumb. Rather make a random map spawn.
4.) Just make a Last man standing mode where people have one life, no armor, no weapon collecting , players should be able to pick their weapon in the menu and then launch in and enjoy 1 life adrenaline on that large scale map.
PS: And please don’t include choppers in WW2 game, there were barely any in Europe except the Vietnam war.
I play Battlefield games for the type of gameplay that it offers, not for a BR mode. I’m not looking forward to it, nor will I be playing it. Although, I haven’t been playing BFV much as it is now.
So true. u are right on the subject dude. EA wanted to ride the pubG and Fortnite wave since the launch. They were telling us about the big attrition system they invented…and it was crap taken from other games just to make a camp related game with low ammo, hoping to sell millions of copies. The bigest fail in BF history. And now…they keep going on the road to absolute finish of the franchise. amazing job :)) and these people have millions on their hands…with such ideas :))
whether you vote yes or no is irrelevant. it’s not for us, it’s to rope in all those cash casuals into the battlefield franchise. all the players out there who’ve played the other battle royals. if we like it, it’s just a bonus.
Battle royale sounds cool but primarily I want a battlefield game focused on conquest and breakthrough and now that were on the eve of the battle royale release it’s clear now that so many resources were put on the battle royale part that the main game suffered from a severe lack of content as a result, and I’m just not sure if it was worth it, I’m sure I’ll like it but the resources need to be pulled off battle royale and put towards the main game from this point forward
