# Poll: Ttk 1.0 vs Ttk 2.0 - which one do you prefer?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [December 15, 2018, 6:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005 "2018-12-15T18:10:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mf\_shro0m](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mf_shro0m/32/106941_2.png) [@mf\_shro0m](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mf_shro0m)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/1 "2018-12-15T18:10:00Z")

</div>

The poll’s in the link

[https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/239131-battlefield-v/77304751#1](https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/239131-battlefield-v/77304751#1)

Please let others, including those who’ve stopped playing, know about this poll so it’ll be as comprehensive as possible. If they haven’t tried both TTKs tell them to try both first and not to rush to a conclusion. The new TTK system goes both ways and so won’t particularly benefit less good players across the board in any way other than letting them live fractions of a second longer each life before they get killed.  
In fact in terms of KD, this might even make it worse for less good players as now if they (person A) get the jump on a good player (person B, the good player’s now more likely to have the time to turn around and kill them first

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xAnimalxMotherx](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/xanimalxmotherx/32/107325_2.png) [@xAnimalxMotherx](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/xAnimalxMotherx)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/2 "2018-12-15T18:18:00Z")

</div>

I liked TTK 1.0 better

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![abc1434286920](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/f08c70/32.png) [@abc1434286920](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/abc1434286920)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/3 "2018-12-15T18:22:00Z")

</div>

Somewhere in between. I do feel some guns are just taking too long to kill but overall I welcome the change from the release ttk.  
I wonder if that makes me a casual semi REAL BF player?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WarTurtleKal](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/warturtlekal/32/104043_2.png) [@WarTurtleKal](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/WarTurtleKal)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:36pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/4 "2018-12-15T18:36:00Z")

</div>

I both do and do not like. I like how most weapons have been nerfed at range. That helps with preventing Zerg rushing between zones and you have a chance to get into cover. I don’t like what it’s done to close range combat. It’s edged out slower rate of fire guns and made high DPS guns the best meta to get kills unless you enjoy challenging yourself. Certain guns like the M1907, M1A1, and Gewehr 43 are far more successful now since they had a high DPS in 1.0 and marginally lower DPS in 2.0. 2.0 hass made a better long range experience and has thrown close range completely out of balance. They need to create a middle ground.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GTT\_Ch0pper](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/gtt_ch0pper/32/106702_2.png) [@GTT\_Ch0pper](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GTT_Ch0pper)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:45pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/5 "2018-12-15T18:45:00Z")

</div>

I like it somewhere in between.  
This fiasco should have been a weapon balance patch and not a knee jerk blanket change. TTK should have been adjusted for each weapon for the effective ranges they fit in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zviko0](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/zviko0/32/104209_2.png) [@Zviko0](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Zviko0)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/6 "2018-12-15T18:49:00Z")

</div>

As a Recon main, neither is good. In 1.0, BA rifles have no chance at close, SLRs are fine while in 2.0, BA rifles are slightly better but SLRs are next to useless. I like them both if I play with any other class so I really don’t care which is it as long as they balance Recon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![trip1ex](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/779978/32.png) [@trip1ex](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/trip1ex)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:52pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/7 "2018-12-15T18:52:00Z")

</div>

there is already a comprehensive poll. IT’s in the server browser in-game. Click Conquest and Play to vote ttk 2.0. Click Core Conquest and Play to vote ttk 1.0.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirTerrible](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sirterrible/32/103499_2.png) [@SirTerrible](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SirTerrible)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/8 "2018-12-15T18:54:00Z")

</div>

I prefer the TTK 2.0s TTK but prefer TTK 1.0s weapon balance. IMO 2.0 has more potential but 1.0 is less broken right now I guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chubzdoomer](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chubzdoomer/32/101517_2.png) [@Chubzdoomer](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Chubzdoomer)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:56pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/9 "2018-12-15T18:56:00Z")

</div>

2.0 is more skillful since there’s a wider gap between headshot and body shot damage (with headshot damage being unchanged from 1.0), so 2.0 all the way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemon64](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/7ba0ec/32.png) [@fakemon64](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/fakemon64)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 6:57pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/10 "2018-12-15T18:57:00Z")

</div>

I just wish they tested this in a separate cte first

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sixclicks](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sixclicks/32/103500_2.png) [@Sixclicks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sixclicks)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 7:33pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/11 "2018-12-15T19:33:00Z")

</div>

2.0 has more skillful gameplay. I prefer it.

Weapon balance definitely needs to be adjusted under TTK2 though. Hopefully they’ll fix some of the weapons in the next update and keep TTK2 so that we can get an idea of how it feels with better weapon balance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![uadarthmaul](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/f475e1/32.png) [@uadarthmaul](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/uadarthmaul)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 10:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/12 "2018-12-15T22:11:00Z")

</div>

2 is better. 1 rewarded campers. 2 rewards people who have better aim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delta245](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/2acd7d/32.png) [@Delta245](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Delta245)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 11:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/13 "2018-12-15T23:54:00Z")

</div>

I totally agree that 2 requires better gun control and shot placement it does need some tweaking with weapons and the ttd still needs to be addressed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blakkwolfe](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/blakkwolfe/32/101362_2.png) [@Blakkwolfe](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Blakkwolfe)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 11:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/14 "2018-12-15T23:54:00Z")

</div>

Undecided, but TTK 1.0 so people stop whining.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pest174](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/pest174/32/103106_2.png) [@pest174](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/pest174)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2018, 11:57pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/15 "2018-12-15T23:57:00Z")

</div>

I think there’s room for a middle ground. 2.0 might be a good base, then rebalance weapons accordingly (medic buff). So I’ll say 1.5 is my choice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ITS\_BOB\_GNARLY](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/its_bob_gnarly/32/102333_2.png) [@ITS\_BOB\_GNARLY](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ITS_BOB_GNARLY)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 12:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/16 "2018-12-16T00:31:00Z")

</div>

I’m preferring TTK 2.0, but for gods sake, balance the weapons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Halodri\_GER](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/a88e57/32.png) [@Halodri\_GER](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Halodri_GER)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 12:47am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/17 "2018-12-16T00:47:00Z")

</div>

Both have issues. I liked 1.0 better.  
Im more concernced about them trying to devide the community by introducing a “core” version of each gamemode with TTK 1.0

The devide would be worse than pushing TTK 2.0 on all of us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SumwhatKrazy](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sumwhatkrazy/32/103643_2.png) [@SumwhatKrazy](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SumwhatKrazy)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 4:36am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/18 "2018-12-16T04:36:00Z")

</div>

I actually dont care that much. I didn’t like the fast TTK initially but then i got used to it and adapted and it grew on me and i didn’t want them to change it, but last night i played the new TTK and i didn’t mind it.  
I think there’s been an over reaction. Yeah, the new TTK has made the balance worse in some ways, i get that, bad for medics, but i did ok with it. At times it felt like it robbed me of kills but there’s no doubt several times it saved me so it balanced itself out, for me.  
I still get the odd one frame TTD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Catsonspeeed](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/catsonspeeed/32/105521_2.png) [@Catsonspeeed](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Catsonspeeed)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 4:41am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/19 "2018-12-16T04:41:00Z")

</div>

Maybe it’s just my imagination, or has the gameplay become a bit more sluggish overall with TTK 2.0? I can live with both, but like the original TTK better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![montreal961](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@montreal961](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/montreal961)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2018, 4:42am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005/20 "2018-12-16T04:42:00Z")

</div>

I prefer TTK 2.0

It feels like it takes more skill. The better player usually comes out on top in a gunfight.

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/poll-ttk-1-0-vs-ttk-2-0-which-one-do-you-prefer/254005.md?page=2)
