simply analysing what happened. aka “u get a lot of kills with that vehicle” or “you seem to perform good with this and thst weapon” or “your accuracy with thst weapon is kind of underwhelming, I would try to be more careful with your shots”… i mean it’s really not that hard…
And you really think that the OP came here to get told that he has his most kills in a plane?
Besides that, the part about accuracy would already be about “skill”.
Or the viewpoint could be (instead of “hey mods come look at this”) hey everyone, see how good I am!
This is just another “What is your K/D” thread from braggarts who exploit in one form or another (it will eventually get closed down)
We went approximately 1 week without people staring at themselves in the mirror… this thread would have made itself if OP hand’t done it.
G-2 with 20 mm’s and rockets my fav! And the VA is super easy to kill infantry, like get 2-3 ppl per pass easy.. I don’t care for bomber they need people like me to stay alive from people like me! Only thing I need help with is a good MAA person but can kill most of those to! The 20 mm’s on g-2 are nasty as well on infantry and planes!
not at all. saying that the accuracy on a gun is underwhelming is not the same as saying that the guy is bad with this gun. it just means that in my opinion he hits only a small amount of shots, nothing more. skill is about ability, stats are about performance, two distinct concepts.
also I wrote “u seem to GET a lot of kills in that vehicle” not “u seem to HAVE…”. I could equivalently write: “your kpm on that vehicle is really good”.
however these are just example sentences anyways.
you calling it “unnecessary nitpicking” clearly shows that you don’t understand the point of this. also I already said thst it’s just an example of what one could say to judge stats instead of skill. thst doesn’t mean that the op came here with the intention to hear exactly this example.
now reread and and use your brain before replying thanks…