# Semi automatic rifles need increase DAMAGE

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/semi-automatic-rifles-need-increase-damage/107479>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [February 8, 2020, 10:46pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/semi-automatic-rifles-need-increase-damage/107479 "2020-02-08T22:46:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![talhaONE](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/54ee81/32.png) [@talhaONE](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/talhaONE)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2020, 7:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/semi-automatic-rifles-need-increase-damage/107479/21 "2020-02-09T19:21:00Z")

</div>

> [@mf\_shro0m](#):
>
> Or were you talking about in 5.2.2?  
> If you were I mean 5.2 and 5.2.2 have broken the game and all the SARs need tweaking. Upon reviewing I think they’d actually balanced it pretty well in 5.0 and would like to see that balancing structure for the SARs continue. Plus the G1-5’s a 360rpm 3HK in CQC and making the M1A1 a 450rpm 3HK in CQC would break the game even more

They were better then Slrs in 5.0. So no they were not “balanced”.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/semi-automatic-rifles-need-increase-damage/107479.md?page=1)
