# Sentry kits

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/sentry-kits/105833>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [October 18, 2018, 2:16pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/sentry-kits/105833 "2018-10-18T14:16:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madman001able](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/9de0a6/32.png) [@madman001able](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/madman001able)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2018, 12:28am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/sentry-kits/105833/21 "2018-10-19T00:28:00Z")

</div>

> [@MONEYPYR0](#):
>
> > [@madman001able](#):
> >
> > > [@MONEYPYR0](#):
> > >
> > > > [@madman001able](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@MONEYPYR0](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > > [@madman001able](#):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [@MONEYPYR0](#):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [@thecajun](#):
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [@lorenzburg](#):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Probably the Behemoths and Elite kits should remain a BF1 peculiarity, but some kits need to come back, especially the flametroopers.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I wouldn’t necessarily want the FlameTrooper back because it was just too tanky and like others have said about elites they were just used for farming kills but having a flamethrower as a weapon option would be nice. Someone mentioned it is a squad call in, that would be nice if he’s correct.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Not sure about a flamethrower being a squad drop, but I know the British could call in a flame tank.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > [@madman001able](#):
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [@thecajun](#):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [@lorenzburg](#):
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Probably the Behemoths and Elite kits should remain a BF1 peculiarity, but some kits need to come back, especially the flametroopers.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I wouldn’t necessarily want the FlameTrooper back because it was just too tanky and like others have said about elites they were just used for farming kills but having a flamethrower as a weapon option would be nice. Someone mentioned it is a squad call in, that would be nice if he’s correct.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Yeah, you go ahead and strap on that incendiary bomb lol. What could possibly go wrong, 😆
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I mean, most flamethrowers in WWII used liquid instead of gas that would be lit on fire, so getting shot in the tank wouldn’t do anything expect drain the liquid out.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Might want to do your research on that lol.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have. Military flamethrowers back in the day used liquid ingited by a little torch at the end of the barrel to shoot flames out. If you shot a hole in the tank holding the liquid, it would not blow up the user into flames. Now commercial flamethrowers DO use gas, typically propane, to shoot out the fire, and if you shot that, it would explode.
> > > > 
> > > > It would if shot multiple times, or the user ignited himself with the torch end lol.
> > > 
> > > The liquid pouring out would need to come in contact with other fire to have any real damage though.
> > > 
> > > Maybe stop watching too many movies to be your sources
> > 
> > How about you actually look up how they work? There are plenty of real eye witness accounts of the users of these weapon being blown up or burned alive during ww2 and vietnam.
> 
> I have looked up how they work. Why dont you use these accounts you’ve heard to prove me wrong? I’ll admit I’m wrong if you actually show me some proof. The way you initially worded your statement made it seem like you think that a single shot is going to set it off, and blow up the user, which isn’t true.

I never implied that, yet another point you are wrong about it would seem. Google exist for a reason there guy, makes fact checking super easy.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/sentry-kits/105833.md?page=1)