# Should Battlefield 1 have Single Player?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/should-battlefield-1-have-single-player/101708>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 7, 2016, 12:53am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/should-battlefield-1-have-single-player/101708 "2016-06-07T00:53:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2016, 6:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/should-battlefield-1-have-single-player/101708/21 "2016-06-07T18:35:00Z")

</div>

> [@TheAngryYetti03](#):
>
> Not sure if I’d want a bot range like in CoD, fearing the laziness of previous SP installments…the difficulty levels of the bots there were :  
> Recruit - the enemies would walk into you and provide 0 challenge  
> Regular - the enemies would walk into you and provide 0 challenge  
> Hardened - slightly harder than the above, but still extremely bad AI  
> Veteran - the bots would automatically headshot you upon seeing you
> 
> None of these in CoD were realistic, engaging, or teaches players anything that could relate to multiplayer.
> 
> If they just had a good Single Player I’ll be more than happy, the test range would also be a welcomed sight again but not too keen on having bots.

the point of the test range isnt to simulate multiplayer 1 to 1, its to give you practice against moving targets and train your reactions.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/should-battlefield-1-have-single-player/101708.md?page=1)