# So do we have a final verdict about the aimbot called autorotation?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 18, 2016, 11:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253 "2016-06-18T11:52:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kakehc/32/102458_2.png) [@KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KakeHC)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 11:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/1 "2016-06-18T11:52:00Z")

</div>

After 10 thousand threads about this do we get an answer on how will this be in the game?

“Rented servers” Can you adjust this in there without going off the radar?

“Server browser” Can you find servers without it ON, on the server browser?

“Tuning down” Remove the spammable aim assist abuse. Also I have already seen someone in development talking about tuning it down. So how will it finally be? The snapping is real…

“casual players” So people say it is casual to have an aimbot in an multiplayer game. I didn’t even know it excisted on bf4 untill about lvl 120 and was wondering why my aim was moving on it’s own.

So my suggestions to this are!  
1.remove it completely from hardcore game mode firstly. It has no place there since people die instantly anyway.  
2. Make it easyer to find servers what don’t have it on.  
3. Tune it down.  
4. Add an small marking ON the scoreboard of who has it and who don’t.  
5. Remove the spamming abuse part from it.

Sry jamman I steal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heast1](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/heast1/32/102187_2.png) [@heast1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/heast1)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 12:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/2 "2016-06-18T12:10:00Z")

</div>

wrong forum

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kakehc/32/102458_2.png) [@KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KakeHC)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 5:28pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/3 "2016-06-18T17:28:00Z")

</div>

So I should write this to every single one of the console forums instead of general then?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 9:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/4 "2016-06-18T21:41:00Z")

</div>

> [@KakeHC](#):
>
> So I should write this to every single one of the console forums instead of general then?

Considering there’s only two console forums and the fact that this feature is exclusive to the console versions of the game - you should probably post it in the console section.

P.S. - You comparing it to aimbot is just ridiculous, it’s less than a half a second of pull on your aim, a time period where the vast majority of players aren’t even FAST ENOUGH to react to it. The fact that you said you got all the way past rank 100 before you even noticed it existed is proof enough that it barely does , and I don’t even use it because it rapes aiming for sniper rifles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kakehc/32/102458_2.png) [@KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KakeHC)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 10:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/5 "2016-06-18T22:03:00Z")

</div>

That was the moment when someone also told me how to abuse it. And ohboy what happened next.

Not knowing it exists and wondering why my aim is broken might not be a good thing.

And yeah you said it. “It rapes aiming” Fact

Untill you start abusing it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 10:28pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/6 "2016-06-18T22:28:00Z")

</div>

> [@KakeHC](#):
>
> That was the moment when someone also told me how to abuse it. And ohboy what happened next.
> 
> Not knowing it exists and wondering why my aim is broken might not be a good thing.
> 
> And yeah you said it. “It rapes aiming” Fact
> 
> Untill you start abusing it

No, I said it rapes aiming with sniper rifles because the auto-rotation pulls you off targets you’re aiming at if ANY enemy passes by your scope - not an issue with weapons that don’t require mass accuracy and only get a single shot.

The fact that most people who play this game don’t know how to “abuse it” and don’t even have quick enough reflexes to REACT within the half-second of aim assist the game gives you makes this a non-issue. It’s not like there are whole servers full of players “abusing” this feature. BF3 also had snap targetting aim-assist, and it didn’t “break” much there.

I just highly doubt the majority of people who play these games win all their gunfights by spamming the ADS button.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 12:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/7 "2016-06-19T00:33:00Z")

</div>

For all who complain about aim assist and snap to in BF4, I’m surprised your in-game stats aren’t better than what they are.  
I think you probably need aim assist and snap to as much as I do. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![redzuluzulu0096](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/bc79bd/32.png) [@redzuluzulu0096](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/redzuluzulu0096)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 2:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/8 "2016-06-19T02:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> For all who complain about aim assist and snap to in BF4, I’m surprised your in-game stats aren’t better than what they are.  
> I think you probably need aim assist and snap to as much as I do. 🙂

One minute you’re praising casual gaming and discussing removal of stats and the next minute you’re bringing up someone’s stats.  
Pick one and stick to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 2:14am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/9 "2016-06-19T02:14:00Z")

</div>

> [@redzuluzulu0096](#):
>
> > [@Lordmang4](#):
> >
> > For all who complain about aim assist and snap to in BF4, I’m surprised your in-game stats aren’t better than what they are.  
> > I think you probably need aim assist and snap to as much as I do. 🙂
> 
> One minute you’re praising casual gaming and discussing removal of stats and the next minute you’re bringing up someone’s stats.  
> Pick one and stick to it.

Seems to be a lot of that going around. Some guy just yesterday said that I was a troll and that I belittle people, and then continued with saying I’m garbage at the game and stat-bashed me. Dude’s banned right now as it stands. Meh, logic, huh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nobel83-9](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/nobel83-9/32/102968_2.png) [@Nobel83-9](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Nobel83-9)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 2:16am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/10 "2016-06-19T02:16:00Z")

</div>

Someone can find the thread which contains this:

A dev actually posted here recently and hinted that auto rotation is going to be weaker.

Another thing, EA and Dice have a comp initiative for BF1 and I am certain whatever gamemode they create for comp gameplay will not have auto rotation at all.

I agree auto rotation should not be in the game. If a casual or lesser skilled player kills me I want him to earn it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![redzuluzulu0096](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/bc79bd/32.png) [@redzuluzulu0096](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/redzuluzulu0096)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 2:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/11 "2016-06-19T02:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@Loqtrall](#):
>
> > [@redzuluzulu0096](#):
> >
> > > [@Lordmang4](#):
> > >
> > > For all who complain about aim assist and snap to in BF4, I’m surprised your in-game stats aren’t better than what they are.  
> > > I think you probably need aim assist and snap to as much as I do. 🙂
> > 
> > One minute you’re praising casual gaming and discussing removal of stats and the next minute you’re bringing up someone’s stats.  
> > Pick one and stick to it.
> 
> Seems to be a lot of that going around. Some guy just yesterday said that I was a troll and that I belittle people, and then continued with saying I’m garbage at the game and stat-bashed me. Dude’s banned right now as it stands. Meh, logic, huh?

Yea, I saw that one.  
Ridiculous.  
Also a never ending rush of complaints and suppositions about a game that’s in pre-Alpha. Facepalms galore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 2:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/12 "2016-06-19T02:19:00Z")

</div>

Comprehension 101.  
One can recommend the removal of certain stats while still referring to such stats before they are removed (if ever).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snakeheadinvade](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/bbce88/32.png) [@snakeheadinvade](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snakeheadinvade)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 3:52am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/13 "2016-06-19T03:52:00Z")

</div>

> [@Loqtrall](#):
>
> > [@KakeHC](#):
> >
> > So I should write this to every single one of the console forums instead of general then?
> 
> Considering there’s only two console forums and the fact that this feature is exclusive to the console versions of the game - you should probably post it in the console section.
> 
> P.S. - You comparing it to aimbot is just ridiculous, it’s less than a half a second of pull on your aim, a time period where the vast majority of players aren’t even FAST ENOUGH to react to it. The fact that you said you got all the way past rank 100 before you even noticed it existed is proof enough that it barely does , and I don’t even use it because it rapes aiming for sniper rifles.

no this should be where its at what hes talking about is battlefield related and it is general chat

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snakeheadinvade](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/bbce88/32.png) [@snakeheadinvade](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/snakeheadinvade)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 3:57am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/14 "2016-06-19T03:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@redzuluzulu0096](#):
>
> > [@Lordmang4](#):
> >
> > For all who complain about aim assist and snap to in BF4, I’m surprised your in-game stats aren’t better than what they are.  
> > I think you probably need aim assist and snap to as much as I do. 🙂
> 
> One minute you’re praising casual gaming and discussing removal of stats and the next minute you’re bringing up someone’s stats.  
> Pick one and stick to it.

^^^  
i agree with you

response to lordman

really the only reason peoples stats arent higher is because no one knows that smoke and jumping breaks aim assist that being said i do want it reduced to bf3 levels of aim assis so i wont have to bunny jump in order to make players miss shots

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 3:57am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/15 "2016-06-19T03:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@snakeheadinvade](#):
>
> > [@Loqtrall](#):
> >
> > > [@KakeHC](#):
> > >
> > > So I should write this to every single one of the console forums instead of general then?
> > 
> > Considering there’s only two console forums and the fact that this feature is exclusive to the console versions of the game - you should probably post it in the console section.
> > 
> > P.S. - You comparing it to aimbot is just ridiculous, it’s less than a half a second of pull on your aim, a time period where the vast majority of players aren’t even FAST ENOUGH to react to it. The fact that you said you got all the way past rank 100 before you even noticed it existed is proof enough that it barely does , and I don’t even use it because it rapes aiming for sniper rifles.
> 
> no this should be where its at what hes talking about is battlefield related and it is general chat

PC hackers and anti-cheat systems are also related to BF, but it’s still a PC-related issue, not an OVERALL issue with the game of Battlefield. Aim Assist is exclusively a console issue, not an overall BF issue. There are still tens of thousands of people who play without the option of Aim Assist even present in the game at all.

It’s literally begging for people to come into the thread who have never experienced AA in the game because they play on PC, and say some outrageous stuff. Just like when people post stuff about anti-hacks on GC, and console players come in spewing things like “HA! PCMasterRace? More like PCHackerRace!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kakehc/32/102458_2.png) [@KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KakeHC)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 10:36am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/16 "2016-06-19T10:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> For all who complain about aim assist and snap to in BF4, I’m surprised your in-game stats aren’t better than what they are.  
> I think you probably need aim assist and snap to as much as I do. 🙂

You can go ahead and have 1300+ h on hc mode when played 80% infantry and ptoing. And not playing like a monkey wtj’ing and running away from vehicles. I had switched to losing team more than I can count.

[http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/soldier/Magic\_Dragon16/stats/1764620045/ps4/](http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/soldier/Magic_Dragon16/stats/1764620045/ps4/)

Here is my 2 account. Autorotation off all times. Playing all maps and PTO all times.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HighbornDeathMan](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/d07c76/32.png) [@HighbornDeathMan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HighbornDeathMan)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 11:03am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/17 "2016-06-19T11:03:00Z")

</div>

I prefer the term ‘Aim-Assist’ to ‘Aim-Bot’.  
‘Aim-Bot’ is a hack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kakehc/32/102458_2.png) [@KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KakeHC)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 11:04am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/18 "2016-06-19T11:04:00Z")

</div>

[![Video: HOw to abuse auto rotation](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/4/9/495253dacf3a3a07a442503dadf3d83484c39517.jpeg "HOw to abuse auto rotation") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_oZcUO2ffE)

people doing this all the time. YEAH I AIM.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 11:05am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/19 "2016-06-19T11:05:00Z")

</div>

> [@HighbornDeathMan](#):
>
> I prefer the term ‘Aim-Assist’ to ‘Aim-Bot’.  
> ‘Aim-Bot’ is a hack.

Exactly.  
If Aim assist were really an aimbot, then all gamer’s accuracy stats would be higher than they really are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kakehc/32/102458_2.png) [@KakeHC](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KakeHC)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2016, 11:06am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253/20 "2016-06-19T11:06:00Z")

</div>

> [@HighbornDeathMan](#):
>
> I prefer the term ‘Aim-Assist’ to ‘Aim-Bot’.  
> ‘Aim-Bot’ is a hack.

Well it is an ingame aimbot. FACT

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/so-do-we-have-a-final-verdict-about-the-aimbot-called-autorotation/102253.md?page=2)
