# Solution for Battlefield WW1 Realism (Just a thought) **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 21, 2016, 3:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358 "2016-06-21T15:01:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tbfl/32/103708_2.png) [@TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TBFL)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/1 "2016-06-21T15:01:00Z")
Why not have like a WW1 mode just like hardcore? -No prototype or advanced weapons -No Revives -No spawning an squad memebers since you couldnt do that in the past -.- -No prototype vehicles -Vehicles will be of normal speed -No map unless u press M or the relevent key to get the full map. -No advaced customised weapons or advaced gadgets -No spotting Could DICE just implement this like a preset? So that people who want a WW1 simulation can have that and play on that type of server? There are already preset options like Infantry Only. And there are option in the server manager to adjust bullet damage. And all spawning and spotting settings adjustments are already there. Why not give the people what they want if its something they want. After all its not going a lot out of the way. Just cutting off the “FUN ELEMENT” and just make it “REAL”. At the end of the day server Admins choose whats played on their server and not the players (although they can vote -.-). You should play on servers which fulfils your needs. If you want a WW1 realism server then you should join that sort of server or rent your own server and set it up as such. “Battlefield experience that many fell in love with – that idea of an intuitive military _sandbox_ where air, vehicle and infantry combat seamlessly combine” Everyone should be glad that DICE is doing a such a great job of making this game. Rather than nitpicking on something that can be solved easily. And guys we are all battlefielders. (Sorry not a native english speaker) ---
**Author:** ![TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tbfl/32/103708_2.png) [@TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TBFL)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:08pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/2 "2016-06-21T15:08:00Z")
Just saying but those historians who say battlefield is not realistic. I doubt they have ever played battlefield. And if you want a war simulator you should go play something like ARMA. People like FlackFire (the only person i know who knows a lot about history of WW1 and is a battlefield player) doesnt seem to have any problem. Unless Activision or someone is trying to dig up dirt on DICE its a shame that everyone is making a such a big deal of this ---
**Author:** ![robkrush](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a9adbd/32.png) [@robkrush](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/robkrush)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/3 "2016-06-21T15:11:00Z")
The solution for realism is to find a milsim game. Battlefield is a AAA FPS video game designed for gameplay. Obviously, since they are portraying a WWI setting, it needs to resemble WWI to some extent but they also NEED to take some liberties to make the gameplay fun and to make the game feel like a Battlefield game. ---
**Author:** ![joel\_james98](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/76d3ee/32.png) [@joel\_james98](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/joel_james98)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:16pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/4 "2016-06-21T15:16:00Z")
Wanting DICE to create a very realistic shooter will change Battlefield indefinitely to an extent that it isn’t battlefield anymore. ---
**Author:** ![TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tbfl/32/103708_2.png) [@TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TBFL)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:17pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/5 "2016-06-21T15:17:00Z")
Totally but if you just add a simple preset like “stupid realistic” or something with all the necessary settings DICE will be done with the making it REAL part of it. They wouldnt have the headache of everyone crying over it being not realistic enough. Then they can focus on more important stuff ---
**Author:** ![TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/tbfl/32/103708_2.png) [@TBFL](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TBFL)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/6 "2016-06-21T15:19:00Z")
> [@joel\_james98](#): > > Wanting DICE to create a very realistic shooter will change Battlefield indefinitely to an extent that it isn’t battlefield anymore. Dude just a preset just like Hardcore, Normal, Infantry Only, Classic It would be a server preset. Everyone (99%) of us would still have the battlefield we love. Except without freaking UCAVs -.- ---
**Author:** ![ThePaleHorse66](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@ThePaleHorse66](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePaleHorse66)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 3:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/solution-for-battlefield-ww1-realism-just-a-thought/102358/7 "2016-06-21T15:34:00Z")
Or just go and join the military if you want realism!