# Someone said the Scar H wasn't Op **URL:** \ **Category:** Console\ **Created:** [June 18, 2016, 8:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937 "2016-06-18T08:38:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/marxistdictator/32/102751_2.png) [@MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MarxistDictator)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 12:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937/21 "2016-06-21T00:17:00Z")
That is still a very flawed portrait of the gun, it’s not as good at long range anymore. Average with other assault rifles if you get one headshot which is again a lot easier with a gun with a high rate of fire. And yeah, the M16 and most other 5.56 assault guns are better overall because maps that aren’t locker have 50m sightlines. The SCAR H is a semi unique high performing gun, but without the devastating 25 min damage it used to have its pretty toothless down long range so it’s pretty limited to the role it performs well in which is cqb. Multiple accounts is a wiener move too. ---
**Author:** ![Nobel83-9](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/nobel83-9/32/102968_2.png) [@Nobel83-9](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Nobel83-9)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 12:27am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937/22 "2016-06-21T00:27:00Z")
Scar is one of my favs. Great vid. It is op in certain situations. Would not use it on OP Outbreak though. m16a4 has a faster TTK past I believe 30m. If you can manage to turn the m16a4 full auto (wink) for CQB situations then it is by far the better gun. ---
**Author:** ![The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/the_berg_366/32/101051_2.png) [@The\_BERG\_366](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/The_BERG_366)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 12:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937/23 "2016-06-21T00:46:00Z")
> [@MarxistDictator](#): > > Multiple accounts is a wiener move too. [https://gyazo.com/506d54cb79cadacb3bf7abe2b2882e95](https://gyazo.com/506d54cb79cadacb3bf7abe2b2882e95) well done sir… > [@MarxistDictator](#): > > the only thing that proves is that you will win most gunfights if bullets are coming out of your eyeballs when only the upper half of your head is visible, which we already knew. bad game design. that got patches like a year ago u funny. The bullets spawn somewhat near ur barrel now, like a few cm under the dot of ur sight (depending on the kind of weapon and sight). That’s also why the sniper rifles r now locked to 100m zero distance minimum… zero clue of the game mechanics but one huge mouth. -.- ---
**Author:** ![SmokeSweatMaster](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/e9c0ed/32.png) [@SmokeSweatMaster](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SmokeSweatMaster)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 1:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937/24 "2016-06-21T01:33:00Z")
> [@The\_BERG\_366](#): > > > [@MarxistDictator](#): > > > > Multiple accounts is a wiener move too. > > [https://gyazo.com/506d54cb79cadacb3bf7abe2b2882e95](https://gyazo.com/506d54cb79cadacb3bf7abe2b2882e95) > well done sir… > > > [@MarxistDictator](#): > > > > the only thing that proves is that you will win most gunfights if bullets are coming out of your eyeballs when only the upper half of your head is visible, which we already knew. bad game design. > > that got patches like a year ago u funny. The bullets spawn somewhat near ur barrel now, like a few cm under the dot of ur sight (depending on the kind of weapon and sight). That’s also why the sniper rifles r now locked to 100m zero distance minimum… > zero clue of the game mechanics but one huge mouth. -.- Lmao and this the Ps4 section. Hes lost ---
**Author:** ![MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/marxistdictator/32/102751_2.png) [@MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MarxistDictator)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 1:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937/25 "2016-06-21T01:46:00Z")
linked profiles aren’t extra soldiers dummy. notice how there is zero play time bf3-Hardline on them? lol. you’re pretty observant yourself Not quite your eyes but you can still do it, just not without being 100% behind cover anymore. 90% is fine. I still consider that more of the same , cheap exploitable tactics are still cheap. The game should realize guns are held at the shoulder, but it doesn’t. Bullets come out of your mouth now I forgot. ---
**Author:** ![SmokeD\_BabooN](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/smoked_baboon/32/103535_2.png) [@SmokeD\_BabooN](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SmokeD_BabooN)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2016, 6:54am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937/26 "2016-06-21T06:54:00Z")
I love the amount of no gravs here. Forumfail [Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/someone-said-the-scar-h-wasnt-op/104937.md?page=1)