Tankers get way to much hate.

Concluding the real reason they are “weak” is not for the desin of the maps. That is a variable.

The real reason is that they are different from BBC2, BF3 BF4 and that they are diversified among them.
Limited ammunition, limited maneuverability, damage to the tracks and turret, unprotected top gunner (plus some annoying bugs).

Just imagine having a TIGER or CHURCHILL with INFINITE Ammunition, Speed ​​of acceleration and rotation, top gunner protected that can protect you in 360 degrees, and no disables, heavy armor like in BF3 / BF4. Well you have imagined a tiger with an M1 abrams and what would it change? In fact we will play the tank as we have always done in BF3 / 4.

But since BF5 is not like that but it is different for the tanks then the players have to prepare new strategies in this regard and the style of play is different.
This unfortunately people do not understand it and in fact those who criticize the strategies adopted by the tankers are also the first to die in the tank when they use tank.
Having said that I love Tank in BF5 although we have some bugs and balance to make, I really enjoy the new changes despite everything.

Here’s a secret, you don’t have to care a bit about what others say how you play.

Here’s a tip, you don’t have to post if you’re not interested in a discussion :wink:

You can probably become a moderator if you care what others are posting. That’s their job.

And if you don’t care what others are posting why are you even replying? If I give a I don’t post^^

im agree with him it not OK for flyplan have 4000LB bomb and 6 PDR in sametime

Who cares what you do, you are a forum poster arguing an opinion with another opinion. Seriously.

Isn’t that hilarious, in a sad sort of way? What kind of mind refuses to respect an opponent’s skill? Talk about immature.

In this game, I’m going 58-0 top score, and I’m getting the blame for our side losing when we have the other could be tank, playing mobile aa going 11-7 for half the match.

Talking about most of my opponents when I was in a tank. Otherwise, the title should have been “Tankers get way to much respect.”

The problem is not with the movement itself but with the way devs thought it is vehicular gameplay and part two the ammunition. IRL a Tiger tank had about at least double ammount of shells. NO ONE WANTS infinite shells. But having 18 shells from the get go, aside watching for assaults that are biggest threat to any vehicle, your main concern is attrition. It is dumb, spending more than half a time going for ressuplies is just dumb. Basically if you are a tonker, you are punished for your choice as a class.

That’s it.

And still I lol how one single assault instead fearing a Tiger, rushes it with confidence, for a certain kill. And that is done also by newbs and skilled players as well. Basically there’s no skill gap inside assault class vs vehicles. Casual game is casual.

Yes Heavy tanks need more ammo , like 30 main and 1000 mg in my opinions. And if they put a specialization for protecting top gunner, you can deal vs assault class very well.

Looking at your stats and watching you play for 10 min I can understand why people would flame you…

You go 70-0 and suddenly every enemy assault player becomes a master of tanks and needs to tell you what you are doing wrong in them and how much you fail in tanks. Truth!

Because “Talk about immature.” - [parkingbrake]