# The game that near everyone here wants (based upon topic titles) is already here.. **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [May 11, 2016, 2:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117 "2016-05-11T02:31:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/afnav130)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 2:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/1 "2016-05-11T02:31:00Z")
It’s called Battlefield 4. Scopes, parachutes, AKs, M4s, Lock ons. LMGs. Grenade launchers. Air burst. That’s just a partial list of based somewhat on thread topics here. Can you not see this? If you want this stuff so bad, then play BF4. It’s exactly what you want. And thanks to you, BF1 will be what you want it to be. ---
**Author:** ![CasualHorseRMax](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/c0e974/32.png) [@CasualHorseRMax](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/CasualHorseRMax)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 2:34am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/2 "2016-05-11T02:34:00Z")
I seriously noticed the same thing. People are urging for “something new” yet wish for the same. So stupid it makes my eyes bleed. ---
**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 2:39am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/3 "2016-05-11T02:39:00Z")
> [@afnav130](#): > > It’s called Battlefield 4. Scopes, parachutes, AKs, M4s, Lock ons. LMGs. Grenade launchers. Air burst. That’s just a partial list of based somewhat on thread topics here. Can you not see this? > > If you want this stuff so bad, then play BF4. It’s exactly what you want. And thanks to you, BF1 will be what you want it to be. I agree. I think some gamers are hoping that BF1 turns out to be the BF4 that they’ve always wanted but never got. ---
**Author:** ![Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/keif68/32/100928_2.png) [@Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Keif68)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 2:40am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/4 "2016-05-11T02:40:00Z")
Seems that way^ ---
**Author:** ![afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/afnav130)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 2:44am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/5 "2016-05-11T02:44:00Z")
> [@CasualHorseRMax](#): > > I seriously noticed the same thing. People are urging for “something new” yet wish for the same. So stupid it makes my eyes bleed. Thank you for agreeing with me you all. I was wondering if I was waaay off base. Guess not lol. ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 2:51am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/6 "2016-05-11T02:51:00Z")
> [@CasualHorseRMax](#): > > I seriously noticed the same thing. People are urging for “something new” yet wish for the same. So stupid it makes my eyes bleed. This is the thing with gamers now. They say all day they want something different, yet Call of Duty sells MILLIONS of copies every year that is the same game with little tweaks here and there. While I enjoy COD every few years, I see no reason to buy it every time, because I actually want something different. It is sick how messed up gamers’ views are ---
**Author:** ![afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/afnav130)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:07am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/7 "2016-05-11T03:07:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > [@CasualHorseRMax](#): > > > > I seriously noticed the same thing. People are urging for “something new” yet wish for the same. So stupid it makes my eyes bleed. > > This is the thing with gamers now. They say all day they want something different, yet Call of Duty sells MILLIONS of copies every year that is the same game with little tweaks here and there. > > While I enjoy COD every few years, I see no reason to buy it every time, because I actually want something different. > > It is sick how messed up gamers’ views are Then buck the trend. Dice has a golden opportunity to reset the system. See who’s a real near mil sim (as much as you try to deny it, that’s what Battlefield strives to be) gamer and who’s a Call of Duty quick scop guy. That’s why so many of my friends were stoked to hear WW1. Finally a true historical non WW2 game. If they just capitulate to the 12 year olds, the cycle you rightly stated above, will continue. ---
**Author:** ![Bohunk\_l](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bohunk_l/32/101385_2.png) [@Bohunk\_l](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Bohunk_l)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:10am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/8 "2016-05-11T03:10:00Z")
I actually don’t want any of that. I do want automatics but I want them big, clunky, slow and inefficient. And I will enjoy using my Enfeild rifle. That .303 is a nice round ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:10am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/9 "2016-05-11T03:10:00Z")
lol, Battlefield has never once tried to be a milsim game. ARMA is a milsim, battlefield is an arcade FPS just like call of duty. It has always been like that, and I don’t see it changing ---
**Author:** ![afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/afnav130)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:15am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/10 "2016-05-11T03:15:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > lol, Battlefield has never once tried to be a milsim game. ARMA is a milsim, battlefield is an arcade FPS just like call of duty. It has always been like that, and I don’t see it changing Really? Huh. Cause I’ve heard the opposite from CoD guys. And I was one of them. It doesn’t the have to be ARMA. It needs to be not CoD. That’s all. ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/11 "2016-05-11T03:17:00Z")
> [@afnav130](#): > > > [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > > lol, Battlefield has never once tried to be a milsim game. ARMA is a milsim, battlefield is an arcade FPS just like call of duty. It has always been like that, and I don’t see it changing > > Really? Huh. Cause I’ve heard the opposite from CoD guys. And I was one of them. It doesn’t the have to be ARMA. It needs to be not CoD. That’s all. It isn’t COD, it is a sandbox multplayer shooter… which is not what COD is. COD has no vehicles and is a straight infantry-centric arcadey FPS. If anyone calls BF a realistic shooter, they need meds because they have some serious mental issues. ---
**Author:** ![Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/keif68/32/100928_2.png) [@Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Keif68)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:21am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/12 "2016-05-11T03:21:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > [@afnav130](#): > > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > > > > lol, Battlefield has never once tried to be a milsim game. ARMA is a milsim, battlefield is an arcade FPS just like call of duty. It has always been like that, and I don’t see it changing > > > > Really? Huh. Cause I’ve heard the opposite from CoD guys. And I was one of them. It doesn’t the have to be ARMA. It needs to be not CoD. That’s all. > > It isn’t COD, it is a sandbox multplayer shooter… which is not what COD is. COD has no vehicles and is a straight infantry-centric arcadey FPS. If anyone calls BF a realistic shooter, they need meds because they have some serious mental issues. Well said ---
**Author:** ![afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/afnav130)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:24am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/13 "2016-05-11T03:24:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > [@afnav130](#): > > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#): > > > > > > lol, Battlefield has never once tried to be a milsim game. ARMA is a milsim, battlefield is an arcade FPS just like call of duty. It has always been like that, and I don’t see it changing > > > > Really? Huh. Cause I’ve heard the opposite from CoD guys. And I was one of them. It doesn’t the have to be ARMA. It needs to be not CoD. That’s all. > > It isn’t COD, it is a sandbox multplayer shooter… which is not what COD is. COD has no vehicles and is a straight infantry-centric arcadey FPS. If anyone calls BF a realistic shooter, they need meds because they have some serious mental issues. It’s hell of a lot more realistic than CoD. There are laser weapons in development, but they aren’t in BF4. Reason is, it would be dumb to put them in. Look at the reponses to this thread. About all that’s needed. ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:25am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/14 "2016-05-11T03:25:00Z")
It may be more realistic, but it by no means makes Battlefield realistic. Being more realistic than COD isn’t hard at this point in where they are going for setting. ---
**Author:** ![Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/keif68/32/100928_2.png) [@Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Keif68)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:27am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/15 "2016-05-11T03:27:00Z")
> [@ThePoolshark](#): > > Being more realistic than COD isn’t hard at this point in where they are going for setting. ---
**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:28am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/16 "2016-05-11T03:28:00Z")
COD isn’t aiming for realism. Neither is BF for that matter. Video games, people. We’re talking about video games. ---
**Author:** ![Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/keif68/32/100928_2.png) [@Keif68](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Keif68)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:30am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/17 "2016-05-11T03:30:00Z")
> [@Lordmang4](#): > > COD isn’t aiming for realism. > > Neither is BF for that matter. > > Video games, people. We’re talking about video games. Some people live through video games it seems. ---
**Author:** ![S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/s1ngular1ty/32/103340_2.png) [@S1ngular1ty](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/S1ngular1ty)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/18 "2016-05-11T03:33:00Z")
Exactly, lets create BF4 in WWI I’m sure that would be fun. Nope… ---
**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/19 "2016-05-11T03:38:00Z")
> [@Lordmang4](#): > > COD isn’t aiming for realism. > > Neither is BF for that matter. > > Video games, people. We’re talking about video games. People wan’t realism… until it becomes realistic and bores you to death. See 90% of vanilla ARMA 3. That game is booooooooooring without mods ---
**Author:** ![afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@afnav130](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/afnav130)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 3:39am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117/20 "2016-05-11T03:39:00Z")
> [@S1ngular1ty](#): > > Exactly, lets create BF4 in WWI I’m sure that would be fun. > > Nope… Well that what some 12 year olds seem to want and is supported by many here. [Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/the-game-that-near-everyone-here-wants-based-upon-topic-titles-is-already-here/101117.md?page=2)