# They should bring back colonel 100s **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 17, 2016, 8:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220 "2016-06-17T20:10:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 14\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/4491bb/32.png) [@TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TheStrategist242)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 8:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/1 "2016-06-17T20:10:00Z")
With no exp boost. I remember being like o when I would see one intimidated I was. Now when I see a maxed guy it means nothing it’s no longer a accomplishment like it was in bf3. U rarely saw a garbage colonel 100 now maxed players suck as much as there good. Figure out another way to weasel your micro transactions in. ---
**Author:** ![RaNdOmKils666](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e0b2c6/32.png) [@RaNdOmKils666](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/RaNdOmKils666)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 8:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/2 "2016-06-17T20:26:00Z")
I want the C100 (bipod knife) to make a return. ---
**Author:** ![WHISPonPCin240P](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/whisponpcin240p/32/104056_2.png) [@WHISPonPCin240P](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/WHISPonPCin240P)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 9:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/3 "2016-06-17T21:21:00Z")
I’d like to see a Halo 3 style ranking system where there are skill levels based on performance, and ranks based on time played. ---
**Author:** ![TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/4491bb/32.png) [@TheStrategist242](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/TheStrategist242)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 9:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/4 "2016-06-17T21:23:00Z")
I don’t anything about halo but sounds interesting ---
**Author:** ![AK-Bear-12](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/ak-bear-12/32/101168_2.png) [@AK-Bear-12](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AK-Bear-12)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 9:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/5 "2016-06-17T21:24:00Z")
I want colonel 100 badmin abuse too, please DICE ---
**Author:** ![Say\_Hellr](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/say_hellr/32/103374_2.png) [@Say\_Hellr](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Say_Hellr)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 9:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/6 "2016-06-17T21:47:00Z")
I’ve seen plenty of pretty bad C100… High rank means you put in more time… You get plenty of xp boost without paying for a battlepack too, sitting on 129 100% boosts right now… ---
**Author:** ![UnderbossNiko](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/cab0a1/32.png) [@UnderbossNiko](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/UnderbossNiko)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 9:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/7 "2016-06-17T21:50:00Z")
I honestly don’t like the idea of battlepacks in general. ---
**Author:** ![Peccath](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/peccath/32/103094_2.png) [@Peccath](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Peccath)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 10:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/8 "2016-06-17T22:06:00Z")
I’d prefer only few ranks with huge objective- and team-based XP gaps. Ranking up feels like nothing when it happens all the time and all you need is general XP. It’s also silly to have dozens of different variations of the same rank. ---
**Author:** ![Shinnosuke\_Zero](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/shinnosuke_zero/32/103458_2.png) [@Shinnosuke\_Zero](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Shinnosuke_Zero)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 10:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/9 "2016-06-17T22:09:00Z")
> [@WHISPonPCin240P](#): > > I’d like to see a Halo 3 style ranking system where there are skill levels based on performance, and ranks based on time played. Ranking (1-100) = (mu-G(K \* C)+z^w/H)/P\*x mu = (Awards\*.75/ AVG team score) Z = Having a High K/D ratio G = Getting the most medals/ awards X = Skill levels of those you killed / killed you W = Weapons you used H = Head-shots P= PTFOING = Captures, detonations, stops, ousts, etc. K = is a constant assigned an arbitrary value by the developers of the game or mean of average ranked player +/- 2% C = ( | wins - losses | ) ---
**Author:** ![decimation420x](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/3be4f8/32.png) [@decimation420x](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/decimation420x)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 7:07am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/10 "2016-06-18T07:07:00Z")
Word you’re not wrong that max rank in BF3 compared to BF4, are two different worlds. It represented something greater in BF3. & if they can return to that that’d be preferable ---
**Author:** ![SilverJackal143](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/silverjackal143/32/101050_2.png) [@SilverJackal143](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SilverJackal143)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 8:15am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/11 "2016-06-18T08:15:00Z")
> [@AK-Bear-12](#): > > I want colonel 100 badmin abuse too, please DICE Banned for just being a colonel 100. I remember that lol ---
**Author:** ![icED-eaRtH-nz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/iced-earth-nz/32/102265_2.png) [@icED-eaRtH-nz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/icED-eaRtH-nz)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 9:05am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/12 "2016-06-18T09:05:00Z")
Bf2 had a good ranking system, don’t want to see tons of ranks either like in bf3 , and have them based on real ranks from WW1 would be good. Less but harder to get as you progress is the way to go. ---
**Author:** ![bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/bananahead81/32/101282_2.png) [@bananahead81](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bananahead81)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 9:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/13 "2016-06-18T09:19:00Z")
> [@TheStrategist242](#): > > With no exp boost. I remember being like o when I would see one intimidated I was. Now when I see a maxed guy it means nothing it’s no longer a accomplishment like it was in bf3. U rarely saw a garbage colonel 100 now maxed players suck as much as there good. Figure out another way to weasel your micro transactions in. Agree 10000000% No BOOSTS!! Bring back BF3 ways.. ---
**Author:** ![Large\_Footninja](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/large_footninja/32/101981_2.png) [@Large\_Footninja](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Large_Footninja)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2016, 9:26am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/they-should-bring-back-colonel-100s/102220/14 "2016-06-18T09:26:00Z")
> [@Peccath](#): > > I’d prefer only few ranks with huge objective- and team-based XP gaps. Ranking up feels like nothing when it happens all the time and all you need is general XP. It’s also silly to have dozens of different variations of the same rank. Same feeling here. Rank should mean something, maybe add certain basic combat medals as lvl up requirements too.